Evaluation of handgrip strength as a predictor of sarcopenia in patients with HCV-related cirrhosis
Background Sarcopenia, characterised by a loss of muscle strength, quantity/quality, and physical performance, is associated with increased mortality and poor clinical outcomes in patients with liver cirrhosis. The use of the currently accepted methods for estimating muscle mass, such as computed to...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Egyptian Liver Journal 2023-12, Vol.13 (1), p.24-12, Article 24 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | Background
Sarcopenia, characterised by a loss of muscle strength, quantity/quality, and physical performance, is associated with increased mortality and poor clinical outcomes in patients with liver cirrhosis. The use of the currently accepted methods for estimating muscle mass, such as computed tomography, dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry, and bioelectrical impedance analysis, in routine clinical practice is restricted because of limited availability, radiation exposure, time consumption, or high cost. Therefore, an alternative, simple, safe, reproducible, and financially accessible method for the routine assessment of sarcopenia is needed. Hence, we aim to assess the utility of handgrip strength (HGS) in diagnosing sarcopenia in patients with HCV-related cirrhosis compared to appendicular skeletal muscle index assessed by dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DEXA-ASMI). A total of 64 participants older than 18 years were consecutively recruited. The subjects were divided into the following groups: Control group included 32 healthy control subjects, and the HCV-related liver cirrhosis group included 32 patients who were subdivided equally into two subgroups (Child A and Child C) with 16 patients each. All participants were subjected to dominant hand dynamometer and DEXA scan.
Results
The prevalence of sarcopenia was significantly higher in the cirrhosis group than in the control group (7.75 ± 1.35 vs. 8.29 ± 1.25 kg/m
2
,
P
|
---|---|
ISSN: | 2090-6226 2090-6218 2090-6226 |
DOI: | 10.1186/s43066-023-00261-z |