Study on performance of RHS and tapered sections for a multi-bay industrial building

The purpose of this research is to compare and contrast the utilization of Rectangular hollow section and Tapered section for a multiple-bay industrial construction. The many comparison fields primarily demonstrate cost absorption, time consumption, structural weight, and economy of both portions. The shear force and bending moment are computed in this analysis. In Visakhapatnam, a model with a height of 8 meters, a roof angle of 5.71 degrees, and bay spacing of 7.4 meters was chosen, and a comparison was made between a Rectangular hollow section and a Tapered section with the same size of building. Finally, the results reveal that tapered sections are more cost effective than the RHS. The structural weight of the RHS and tapered sections without crane is less than the RHS and taper section with crane.