4CPS-252 Optimisation of ertapenem posology in a critically ill patient by therapeutic drug monitoring: a case report

Background and ImportanceTherapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) of ertapenem is recommended in critically ill patients (CIP) to address their variability in exposure because of its time-dependent, highly protein bound and hydrophilic characteristics.Aim and ObjectivesTo describe efficacy and safety in a...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:European journal of hospital pharmacy. Science and practice 2023-03, Vol.30 (Suppl 1), p.A209-A209
Hauptverfasser: Gracia Moya, A, Garcia Garcia, S, Miarons Font, M, Del Rio GUTIERREZ, JM, Pau Parra, A, Perez Rodriguez, ML, Lalueza Broto, MP, Gorgas Torner, MQ
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Background and ImportanceTherapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) of ertapenem is recommended in critically ill patients (CIP) to address their variability in exposure because of its time-dependent, highly protein bound and hydrophilic characteristics.Aim and ObjectivesTo describe efficacy and safety in a CIP after optimising the posology of ertapenem.Material and MethodsA case report in a CIP treated with ertapenem is described. Data were collected from electronic medical records and ertapenem concentrations were measured by high-performance liquid chromatography.ResultsA 35-year-old men with a body mass index (BMI) of 32.6kg/m2 with a surgical wound culture positive for AmpC-producing Klebsiella pneumoniae was started ertapenem 1g q24h (minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) of 0.38 for Klebsiella). Three days after initiation, ertapenem plasma concentrations were determined. In that moment, his creatinine value was 0.21mg/dL with a glomerular filtration rate (GFR) of 700ml/min by the Cockroft-Gault formula, and his albumin value was 2.9mg/dL. Ertapenem serum concentrations were 1.65mcg/ml (total drug); 0.16mcg/ml of unbound fraction (fu), considering a protein binding of 90%. Fu should be above the MIC, ideally 4 times the MIC (≥1,52 mcg/ml), and fever persisted, so in agreement with the medical team the dosage was optimise to 0.5g q12h considering its time-dependent pharmacokinetics. Two days after posology optimisation, the patient became afebrile, and 6 days after being with the new regimen, blood concentrations were remeasured resulting in 6.97mcg/mL, and a fu of 0.69 mcg/mL, which is 1.8 times the MIC. Despite not having reached fu of 4 times the MIC, given that the patient remained afebrile after dose optimisation and as a precaution for not reaching toxic concentrations due to an increase in the total daily dose, the 0.5g q12h dosage was maintained for another week, when the infection was solved and the antibiotic discontinued.No adverse effects related to ertapenem were reported.Conclusion and RelevanceThe optimisation of ertapenem posology, changing the frequency without increasing the total daily dose, allowed increasing ertapenem concentrations and improved the clinical outcome of a CIP with augmented renal clearance, low albumin and high BMI, characteristics that may lower ertapenem concentrations, without decreasing the safety of the drug.References and/or AcknowledgementsConflict of InterestNo conflict of interest
ISSN:2047-9956
2047-9964
DOI:10.1136/ejhpharm-2023-eahp.432