N-coordinated Ru( ii ) catalyzed solvent free N -alkylation of primary amines with alcohols through borrowing hydrogen strategy

Borrowing hydrogenation (BH) is a powerful methodology, which is widely adopted for the N -alkylation of amines with alcohols using homogeneous molecular catalysts. To explore the chemistry, herein two novel monomeric Ru( ii ) complexes [(η 6 - p -cymene)Ru(L1)Cl 2 ] [Ru-1] bearing 4-trifluromethoxy...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:New journal of chemistry 2023-05, Vol.47 (17), p.8305-8317
Hauptverfasser: Patel, Bhavya, Ranjan, Rishi, Chauhan, Nimesh R., Mukhopadhyay, Suman, Choudhury, Angshuman Roy, Vyas, Komal M.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Borrowing hydrogenation (BH) is a powerful methodology, which is widely adopted for the N -alkylation of amines with alcohols using homogeneous molecular catalysts. To explore the chemistry, herein two novel monomeric Ru( ii ) complexes [(η 6 - p -cymene)Ru(L1)Cl 2 ] [Ru-1] bearing 4-trifluromethoxyaniline (L1) and [(η 6 - p -cymene)Ru(L2)Cl] [Ru-2] bearing quinaldic acid (L2) were synthesized and their structural features were revealed by utilizing analytical and spectroscopic methods like FTIR, 1 H and 13 C NMR, ESI-MS, and elemental analysis. The lattice structures of both [Ru-1] and [Ru-2] were elucidated by Single Crystal XRD (SC-XRD). Also, aniline-based complex [Ru-3] was synthesized according to the literature and used for comparison. The catalytic efficacy of [Ru-(1–3)] was examined for N -alkylation of amines utilizing alcohols as alkylating agents in benign and solvent-free conditions. The catalytic performance was monitored by GC–MS and HPLC analyses. The primary amine-based (L1) complex [Ru-1] showed a very impressive and efficient conversion of 96%, whereas –N, O donor ligand based (L2) complex [Ru-2] and the unsubstituted aniline based [Ru-3] were able to achieve 25% and 90% conversion, respectively in similar reaction conditions. This drastic variation in catalytic performance was observed due to the co-operative effect of –NH 2 in [Ru-1] and [Ru-3]. Metal–ligand cooperation (MLC) in both the complexes stabilizes the intermediate transition state and also the electron deficient Ru( ii ) center in [Ru-1] has very good binding affinity towards the substrate, which leads to superior catalytic conversion with [Ru-1] compared to [Ru-2] and [Ru-3].
ISSN:1144-0546
1369-9261
DOI:10.1039/D3NJ00210A