How to Be a More Effective Author

To achieve this objective, authors should remember that the readership of Monthly Weather Review may be very broad, given the global reach of publications on the internet and the increasing interdisciplinarity of our field: scientific results and research methods from one discipline are increasingly needed and being adapted in other disciplines. [...]the exact role that the low-level jet played is unstated. [...]the best problem statements are those that engage the reader through a paradox, error, missing data/information, or inconsistency in the literature. Studying a case because it was a heavy-precipitation event is certainly worthy, but it alone is an insufficient reason to publish in Monthly Weather Review.