Institutional Inversion and “Demand-Side” Versus “Supply-Side” Views of Culture

Institutional inversion occurs when collective attitudes lead to institutions that in turn lead to behaviors that are the opposite of those attitudes. We illustrate this process with the case of debt, in which antidebtor attitudes in Protestant (vs. Catholic) cultures led to institutions that foster...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Current directions in psychological science : a journal of the American Psychological Society 2023-04, Vol.32 (2), p.131-136
Hauptverfasser: Cohen, Dov, Seo, Minjae, Lawless, Robert M.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 136
container_issue 2
container_start_page 131
container_title Current directions in psychological science : a journal of the American Psychological Society
container_volume 32
creator Cohen, Dov
Seo, Minjae
Lawless, Robert M.
description Institutional inversion occurs when collective attitudes lead to institutions that in turn lead to behaviors that are the opposite of those attitudes. We illustrate this process with the case of debt, in which antidebtor attitudes in Protestant (vs. Catholic) cultures led to institutions that fostered higher household indebtedness. We describe three factors hypothesized to make institutional inversion more likely: erroneous lay theories (particularly those that take a “demand-side” vs. a “supply-side” view of culture), moralization, and narrow construals (in terms of time, goals, and populations considered).
doi_str_mv 10.1177/09637214221136087
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2796842810</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sage_id>10.1177_09637214221136087</sage_id><sourcerecordid>2796842810</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c264t-f39b903d1a3803219d69ed05da016ca4b221937e711dbaaf9c98cd473bb9f09b3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1UMtKxDAUDaJgHf0AdwXXHXOTmDRLGV8DAy7Gx7KkTSodOm1NGmV28yH6c_MlplSYhbi6h3secA5C54CnAEJcYsmpIMAIAaAcp-IARcC4SNLwPUTRwCeD4BidOLfCGBPKRIRe543rq973VduoOp43H8a6gGPV6Hi3_box64CSZaXNbvsdvwTWu4FY-q6rN3uiMp8ubst45uveW3OKjkpVO3P2eyfo-e72afaQLB7v57PrRVIQzvqkpDKXmGpQNMWUgNRcGo2vtMLAC8Xy0EdSYQSAzpUqZSHTQjNB81yWWOZ0gi7G3M627964Plu13oYqLiNC8pSRFHBQwagqbOucNWXW2Wqt7CYDnA37ZX_2C57p6HHqzexT_zf8ACa2cxw</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2796842810</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Institutional Inversion and “Demand-Side” Versus “Supply-Side” Views of Culture</title><source>Access via SAGE</source><creator>Cohen, Dov ; Seo, Minjae ; Lawless, Robert M.</creator><creatorcontrib>Cohen, Dov ; Seo, Minjae ; Lawless, Robert M.</creatorcontrib><description>Institutional inversion occurs when collective attitudes lead to institutions that in turn lead to behaviors that are the opposite of those attitudes. We illustrate this process with the case of debt, in which antidebtor attitudes in Protestant (vs. Catholic) cultures led to institutions that fostered higher household indebtedness. We describe three factors hypothesized to make institutional inversion more likely: erroneous lay theories (particularly those that take a “demand-side” vs. a “supply-side” view of culture), moralization, and narrow construals (in terms of time, goals, and populations considered).</description><identifier>ISSN: 0963-7214</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1467-8721</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1177/09637214221136087</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Los Angeles, CA: SAGE Publications</publisher><ispartof>Current directions in psychological science : a journal of the American Psychological Society, 2023-04, Vol.32 (2), p.131-136</ispartof><rights>The Author(s) 2023</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c264t-f39b903d1a3803219d69ed05da016ca4b221937e711dbaaf9c98cd473bb9f09b3</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-7372-7249 ; 0000-0002-0520-8527 ; 0000-0002-3791-2914</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://journals.sagepub.com/doi/pdf/10.1177/09637214221136087$$EPDF$$P50$$Gsage$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/09637214221136087$$EHTML$$P50$$Gsage$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,21819,27924,27925,43621,43622</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Cohen, Dov</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Seo, Minjae</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lawless, Robert M.</creatorcontrib><title>Institutional Inversion and “Demand-Side” Versus “Supply-Side” Views of Culture</title><title>Current directions in psychological science : a journal of the American Psychological Society</title><addtitle>Curr Dir Psychol Sci</addtitle><description>Institutional inversion occurs when collective attitudes lead to institutions that in turn lead to behaviors that are the opposite of those attitudes. We illustrate this process with the case of debt, in which antidebtor attitudes in Protestant (vs. Catholic) cultures led to institutions that fostered higher household indebtedness. We describe three factors hypothesized to make institutional inversion more likely: erroneous lay theories (particularly those that take a “demand-side” vs. a “supply-side” view of culture), moralization, and narrow construals (in terms of time, goals, and populations considered).</description><issn>0963-7214</issn><issn>1467-8721</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2023</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp1UMtKxDAUDaJgHf0AdwXXHXOTmDRLGV8DAy7Gx7KkTSodOm1NGmV28yH6c_MlplSYhbi6h3secA5C54CnAEJcYsmpIMAIAaAcp-IARcC4SNLwPUTRwCeD4BidOLfCGBPKRIRe543rq973VduoOp43H8a6gGPV6Hi3_box64CSZaXNbvsdvwTWu4FY-q6rN3uiMp8ubst45uveW3OKjkpVO3P2eyfo-e72afaQLB7v57PrRVIQzvqkpDKXmGpQNMWUgNRcGo2vtMLAC8Xy0EdSYQSAzpUqZSHTQjNB81yWWOZ0gi7G3M627964Plu13oYqLiNC8pSRFHBQwagqbOucNWXW2Wqt7CYDnA37ZX_2C57p6HHqzexT_zf8ACa2cxw</recordid><startdate>202304</startdate><enddate>202304</enddate><creator>Cohen, Dov</creator><creator>Seo, Minjae</creator><creator>Lawless, Robert M.</creator><general>SAGE Publications</general><general>SAGE PUBLICATIONS, INC</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7372-7249</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0520-8527</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3791-2914</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>202304</creationdate><title>Institutional Inversion and “Demand-Side” Versus “Supply-Side” Views of Culture</title><author>Cohen, Dov ; Seo, Minjae ; Lawless, Robert M.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c264t-f39b903d1a3803219d69ed05da016ca4b221937e711dbaaf9c98cd473bb9f09b3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2023</creationdate><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Cohen, Dov</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Seo, Minjae</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lawless, Robert M.</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><jtitle>Current directions in psychological science : a journal of the American Psychological Society</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Cohen, Dov</au><au>Seo, Minjae</au><au>Lawless, Robert M.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Institutional Inversion and “Demand-Side” Versus “Supply-Side” Views of Culture</atitle><jtitle>Current directions in psychological science : a journal of the American Psychological Society</jtitle><addtitle>Curr Dir Psychol Sci</addtitle><date>2023-04</date><risdate>2023</risdate><volume>32</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>131</spage><epage>136</epage><pages>131-136</pages><issn>0963-7214</issn><eissn>1467-8721</eissn><abstract>Institutional inversion occurs when collective attitudes lead to institutions that in turn lead to behaviors that are the opposite of those attitudes. We illustrate this process with the case of debt, in which antidebtor attitudes in Protestant (vs. Catholic) cultures led to institutions that fostered higher household indebtedness. We describe three factors hypothesized to make institutional inversion more likely: erroneous lay theories (particularly those that take a “demand-side” vs. a “supply-side” view of culture), moralization, and narrow construals (in terms of time, goals, and populations considered).</abstract><cop>Los Angeles, CA</cop><pub>SAGE Publications</pub><doi>10.1177/09637214221136087</doi><tpages>6</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7372-7249</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0520-8527</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3791-2914</orcidid></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0963-7214
ispartof Current directions in psychological science : a journal of the American Psychological Society, 2023-04, Vol.32 (2), p.131-136
issn 0963-7214
1467-8721
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_2796842810
source Access via SAGE
title Institutional Inversion and “Demand-Side” Versus “Supply-Side” Views of Culture
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-22T19%3A55%3A26IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Institutional%20Inversion%20and%20%E2%80%9CDemand-Side%E2%80%9D%20Versus%20%E2%80%9CSupply-Side%E2%80%9D%20Views%20of%20Culture&rft.jtitle=Current%20directions%20in%20psychological%20science%20:%20a%20journal%20of%20the%20American%20Psychological%20Society&rft.au=Cohen,%20Dov&rft.date=2023-04&rft.volume=32&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=131&rft.epage=136&rft.pages=131-136&rft.issn=0963-7214&rft.eissn=1467-8721&rft_id=info:doi/10.1177/09637214221136087&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2796842810%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2796842810&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_sage_id=10.1177_09637214221136087&rfr_iscdi=true