Institutional Inversion and “Demand-Side” Versus “Supply-Side” Views of Culture
Institutional inversion occurs when collective attitudes lead to institutions that in turn lead to behaviors that are the opposite of those attitudes. We illustrate this process with the case of debt, in which antidebtor attitudes in Protestant (vs. Catholic) cultures led to institutions that foster...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Current directions in psychological science : a journal of the American Psychological Society 2023-04, Vol.32 (2), p.131-136 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 136 |
---|---|
container_issue | 2 |
container_start_page | 131 |
container_title | Current directions in psychological science : a journal of the American Psychological Society |
container_volume | 32 |
creator | Cohen, Dov Seo, Minjae Lawless, Robert M. |
description | Institutional inversion occurs when collective attitudes lead to institutions that in turn lead to behaviors that are the opposite of those attitudes. We illustrate this process with the case of debt, in which antidebtor attitudes in Protestant (vs. Catholic) cultures led to institutions that fostered higher household indebtedness. We describe three factors hypothesized to make institutional inversion more likely: erroneous lay theories (particularly those that take a “demand-side” vs. a “supply-side” view of culture), moralization, and narrow construals (in terms of time, goals, and populations considered). |
doi_str_mv | 10.1177/09637214221136087 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2796842810</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sage_id>10.1177_09637214221136087</sage_id><sourcerecordid>2796842810</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c264t-f39b903d1a3803219d69ed05da016ca4b221937e711dbaaf9c98cd473bb9f09b3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1UMtKxDAUDaJgHf0AdwXXHXOTmDRLGV8DAy7Gx7KkTSodOm1NGmV28yH6c_MlplSYhbi6h3secA5C54CnAEJcYsmpIMAIAaAcp-IARcC4SNLwPUTRwCeD4BidOLfCGBPKRIRe543rq973VduoOp43H8a6gGPV6Hi3_box64CSZaXNbvsdvwTWu4FY-q6rN3uiMp8ubst45uveW3OKjkpVO3P2eyfo-e72afaQLB7v57PrRVIQzvqkpDKXmGpQNMWUgNRcGo2vtMLAC8Xy0EdSYQSAzpUqZSHTQjNB81yWWOZ0gi7G3M627964Plu13oYqLiNC8pSRFHBQwagqbOucNWXW2Wqt7CYDnA37ZX_2C57p6HHqzexT_zf8ACa2cxw</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2796842810</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Institutional Inversion and “Demand-Side” Versus “Supply-Side” Views of Culture</title><source>Access via SAGE</source><creator>Cohen, Dov ; Seo, Minjae ; Lawless, Robert M.</creator><creatorcontrib>Cohen, Dov ; Seo, Minjae ; Lawless, Robert M.</creatorcontrib><description>Institutional inversion occurs when collective attitudes lead to institutions that in turn lead to behaviors that are the opposite of those attitudes. We illustrate this process with the case of debt, in which antidebtor attitudes in Protestant (vs. Catholic) cultures led to institutions that fostered higher household indebtedness. We describe three factors hypothesized to make institutional inversion more likely: erroneous lay theories (particularly those that take a “demand-side” vs. a “supply-side” view of culture), moralization, and narrow construals (in terms of time, goals, and populations considered).</description><identifier>ISSN: 0963-7214</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1467-8721</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1177/09637214221136087</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Los Angeles, CA: SAGE Publications</publisher><ispartof>Current directions in psychological science : a journal of the American Psychological Society, 2023-04, Vol.32 (2), p.131-136</ispartof><rights>The Author(s) 2023</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c264t-f39b903d1a3803219d69ed05da016ca4b221937e711dbaaf9c98cd473bb9f09b3</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-7372-7249 ; 0000-0002-0520-8527 ; 0000-0002-3791-2914</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://journals.sagepub.com/doi/pdf/10.1177/09637214221136087$$EPDF$$P50$$Gsage$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/09637214221136087$$EHTML$$P50$$Gsage$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,21819,27924,27925,43621,43622</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Cohen, Dov</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Seo, Minjae</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lawless, Robert M.</creatorcontrib><title>Institutional Inversion and “Demand-Side” Versus “Supply-Side” Views of Culture</title><title>Current directions in psychological science : a journal of the American Psychological Society</title><addtitle>Curr Dir Psychol Sci</addtitle><description>Institutional inversion occurs when collective attitudes lead to institutions that in turn lead to behaviors that are the opposite of those attitudes. We illustrate this process with the case of debt, in which antidebtor attitudes in Protestant (vs. Catholic) cultures led to institutions that fostered higher household indebtedness. We describe three factors hypothesized to make institutional inversion more likely: erroneous lay theories (particularly those that take a “demand-side” vs. a “supply-side” view of culture), moralization, and narrow construals (in terms of time, goals, and populations considered).</description><issn>0963-7214</issn><issn>1467-8721</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2023</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp1UMtKxDAUDaJgHf0AdwXXHXOTmDRLGV8DAy7Gx7KkTSodOm1NGmV28yH6c_MlplSYhbi6h3secA5C54CnAEJcYsmpIMAIAaAcp-IARcC4SNLwPUTRwCeD4BidOLfCGBPKRIRe543rq973VduoOp43H8a6gGPV6Hi3_box64CSZaXNbvsdvwTWu4FY-q6rN3uiMp8ubst45uveW3OKjkpVO3P2eyfo-e72afaQLB7v57PrRVIQzvqkpDKXmGpQNMWUgNRcGo2vtMLAC8Xy0EdSYQSAzpUqZSHTQjNB81yWWOZ0gi7G3M627964Plu13oYqLiNC8pSRFHBQwagqbOucNWXW2Wqt7CYDnA37ZX_2C57p6HHqzexT_zf8ACa2cxw</recordid><startdate>202304</startdate><enddate>202304</enddate><creator>Cohen, Dov</creator><creator>Seo, Minjae</creator><creator>Lawless, Robert M.</creator><general>SAGE Publications</general><general>SAGE PUBLICATIONS, INC</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7372-7249</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0520-8527</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3791-2914</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>202304</creationdate><title>Institutional Inversion and “Demand-Side” Versus “Supply-Side” Views of Culture</title><author>Cohen, Dov ; Seo, Minjae ; Lawless, Robert M.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c264t-f39b903d1a3803219d69ed05da016ca4b221937e711dbaaf9c98cd473bb9f09b3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2023</creationdate><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Cohen, Dov</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Seo, Minjae</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lawless, Robert M.</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><jtitle>Current directions in psychological science : a journal of the American Psychological Society</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Cohen, Dov</au><au>Seo, Minjae</au><au>Lawless, Robert M.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Institutional Inversion and “Demand-Side” Versus “Supply-Side” Views of Culture</atitle><jtitle>Current directions in psychological science : a journal of the American Psychological Society</jtitle><addtitle>Curr Dir Psychol Sci</addtitle><date>2023-04</date><risdate>2023</risdate><volume>32</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>131</spage><epage>136</epage><pages>131-136</pages><issn>0963-7214</issn><eissn>1467-8721</eissn><abstract>Institutional inversion occurs when collective attitudes lead to institutions that in turn lead to behaviors that are the opposite of those attitudes. We illustrate this process with the case of debt, in which antidebtor attitudes in Protestant (vs. Catholic) cultures led to institutions that fostered higher household indebtedness. We describe three factors hypothesized to make institutional inversion more likely: erroneous lay theories (particularly those that take a “demand-side” vs. a “supply-side” view of culture), moralization, and narrow construals (in terms of time, goals, and populations considered).</abstract><cop>Los Angeles, CA</cop><pub>SAGE Publications</pub><doi>10.1177/09637214221136087</doi><tpages>6</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7372-7249</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0520-8527</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3791-2914</orcidid></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0963-7214 |
ispartof | Current directions in psychological science : a journal of the American Psychological Society, 2023-04, Vol.32 (2), p.131-136 |
issn | 0963-7214 1467-8721 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_2796842810 |
source | Access via SAGE |
title | Institutional Inversion and “Demand-Side” Versus “Supply-Side” Views of Culture |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-22T19%3A55%3A26IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Institutional%20Inversion%20and%20%E2%80%9CDemand-Side%E2%80%9D%20Versus%20%E2%80%9CSupply-Side%E2%80%9D%20Views%20of%20Culture&rft.jtitle=Current%20directions%20in%20psychological%20science%20:%20a%20journal%20of%20the%20American%20Psychological%20Society&rft.au=Cohen,%20Dov&rft.date=2023-04&rft.volume=32&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=131&rft.epage=136&rft.pages=131-136&rft.issn=0963-7214&rft.eissn=1467-8721&rft_id=info:doi/10.1177/09637214221136087&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2796842810%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2796842810&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_sage_id=10.1177_09637214221136087&rfr_iscdi=true |