The most commonly used cell surface markers for determining mesenchymal stromal cells in stromal vascular fraction and bone marrow autologous concentrate: a systematic review
The use of regenerative technologies is widely spread in modern medicine. Adipose derived stem cells (ADSCs) in stromal vascular fraction (SVF) seem to be the most advantageous for use in cell therapies and in tissue engineering. The results of bone marrow autologous concentrate (BMAC) use are very...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Journal of biotech research 2023-01, Vol.14, p.85-94 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 94 |
---|---|
container_issue | |
container_start_page | 85 |
container_title | Journal of biotech research |
container_volume | 14 |
creator | Maslennikov, Sergey Maksym, Golovakha |
description | The use of regenerative technologies is widely spread in modern medicine. Adipose derived stem cells (ADSCs) in stromal vascular fraction (SVF) seem to be the most advantageous for use in cell therapies and in tissue engineering. The results of bone marrow autologous concentrate (BMAC) use are very promising. The purpose of this review was to analyze and summarize the available literatures that pertain to the cell surface characterization of ADSCs and bone marrow mesenchymal stromal cells (BMMSCs) from SVF and BMAC, respectively. The results found that the most commonly reported markers for mesenchymal stromal cells (MSCs) derived from adipose tissue (AT) and bone marrow (BM) were CD29, CD44, CD73, CD90, CD105, and should be defined as positive, while CD34, CD45, CD56, CD146 should be defined as negative. For additional markers such as c- Kit (CD117), SSEA-1 (CD15), PDGFR, and CCR5X (CD195), there was no single consensus, although most authors agreed on the positive expression of HLA-ABC and STRO- 1 and the negative expression of HLA -DR. The results concluded that SVF and BMAC were not only concentrates of isolated MSCs, but also containing several additional growth factors. The main regenerative function belonged to MSCs. Therefore, their qualitative and quantitative confirmations were the keys to the effectiveness of SVF and BMAC. For this purpose, it is recommended a minimum panel of positive and negative markers for identifying MSCs, which include the positive markers of CD29, CD44, CD73, CD90, CD105 and the negative markers of CD14, CD31, CD 34, CD45, CD146. |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2789302368</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2789302368</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-p98t-d3440d4c41dafd4efd8a2d3da4a345d5a9b014fb1da016c374c7a12bd46ea6903</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNo9jstqwzAQRU2h0JDmHwa6NsiW_OquhL4g0E32YSyNEqeWlOqRkJ_qN9ZpQ2dzYO6dO_cmmxWdEDkv2-ouW4SwZ5dpWN1Ws-x7vSMwLkSQzhhnxzOkQAokjSOE5DXKSUf_ST6Adh4URfJmsIPdgqFAVu7OBidv9O7Cy2GAwf4vjhhkGtGD9ijj4CygVdA7-5vr3QkwRTe6rUthKmEl2egx0iMghHOIZDAOEjwdBzrdZ7cax0CLK-fZ-uV5vXzLVx-v78unVX7o2pgrLgRTQopCoVaCtGqxVFyhQC4qVWHXs0LofpJZUUveCNlgUfZK1IR1x_g8e_iLPXj3lSjEzd4lb6ePm7JpO85KXrf8B3JIcEU</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2789302368</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>The most commonly used cell surface markers for determining mesenchymal stromal cells in stromal vascular fraction and bone marrow autologous concentrate: a systematic review</title><source>EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals</source><creator>Maslennikov, Sergey ; Maksym, Golovakha</creator><creatorcontrib>Maslennikov, Sergey ; Maksym, Golovakha</creatorcontrib><description>The use of regenerative technologies is widely spread in modern medicine. Adipose derived stem cells (ADSCs) in stromal vascular fraction (SVF) seem to be the most advantageous for use in cell therapies and in tissue engineering. The results of bone marrow autologous concentrate (BMAC) use are very promising. The purpose of this review was to analyze and summarize the available literatures that pertain to the cell surface characterization of ADSCs and bone marrow mesenchymal stromal cells (BMMSCs) from SVF and BMAC, respectively. The results found that the most commonly reported markers for mesenchymal stromal cells (MSCs) derived from adipose tissue (AT) and bone marrow (BM) were CD29, CD44, CD73, CD90, CD105, and should be defined as positive, while CD34, CD45, CD56, CD146 should be defined as negative. For additional markers such as c- Kit (CD117), SSEA-1 (CD15), PDGFR, and CCR5X (CD195), there was no single consensus, although most authors agreed on the positive expression of HLA-ABC and STRO- 1 and the negative expression of HLA -DR. The results concluded that SVF and BMAC were not only concentrates of isolated MSCs, but also containing several additional growth factors. The main regenerative function belonged to MSCs. Therefore, their qualitative and quantitative confirmations were the keys to the effectiveness of SVF and BMAC. For this purpose, it is recommended a minimum panel of positive and negative markers for identifying MSCs, which include the positive markers of CD29, CD44, CD73, CD90, CD105 and the negative markers of CD14, CD31, CD 34, CD45, CD146.</description><identifier>EISSN: 1944-3285</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Edmond: Bio Tech System</publisher><subject>Adipose tissue ; Antigens ; Autografts ; Body fat ; Bone marrow ; Bone surgery ; CD105 antigen ; CD14 antigen ; CD29 antigen ; CD34 antigen ; CD44 antigen ; CD45 antigen ; CD56 antigen ; CD73 antigen ; CD90 antigen ; Cell surface ; Growth factors ; Mesenchymal stem cells ; Orthopedics ; Proteins ; Stem cells ; Stromal cells ; Surface markers ; Surface properties ; Tissue engineering ; Transplants & implants</subject><ispartof>Journal of biotech research, 2023-01, Vol.14, p.85-94</ispartof><rights>2023. This work is published under http://www.btsjournals.com/ (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Maslennikov, Sergey</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Maksym, Golovakha</creatorcontrib><title>The most commonly used cell surface markers for determining mesenchymal stromal cells in stromal vascular fraction and bone marrow autologous concentrate: a systematic review</title><title>Journal of biotech research</title><description>The use of regenerative technologies is widely spread in modern medicine. Adipose derived stem cells (ADSCs) in stromal vascular fraction (SVF) seem to be the most advantageous for use in cell therapies and in tissue engineering. The results of bone marrow autologous concentrate (BMAC) use are very promising. The purpose of this review was to analyze and summarize the available literatures that pertain to the cell surface characterization of ADSCs and bone marrow mesenchymal stromal cells (BMMSCs) from SVF and BMAC, respectively. The results found that the most commonly reported markers for mesenchymal stromal cells (MSCs) derived from adipose tissue (AT) and bone marrow (BM) were CD29, CD44, CD73, CD90, CD105, and should be defined as positive, while CD34, CD45, CD56, CD146 should be defined as negative. For additional markers such as c- Kit (CD117), SSEA-1 (CD15), PDGFR, and CCR5X (CD195), there was no single consensus, although most authors agreed on the positive expression of HLA-ABC and STRO- 1 and the negative expression of HLA -DR. The results concluded that SVF and BMAC were not only concentrates of isolated MSCs, but also containing several additional growth factors. The main regenerative function belonged to MSCs. Therefore, their qualitative and quantitative confirmations were the keys to the effectiveness of SVF and BMAC. For this purpose, it is recommended a minimum panel of positive and negative markers for identifying MSCs, which include the positive markers of CD29, CD44, CD73, CD90, CD105 and the negative markers of CD14, CD31, CD 34, CD45, CD146.</description><subject>Adipose tissue</subject><subject>Antigens</subject><subject>Autografts</subject><subject>Body fat</subject><subject>Bone marrow</subject><subject>Bone surgery</subject><subject>CD105 antigen</subject><subject>CD14 antigen</subject><subject>CD29 antigen</subject><subject>CD34 antigen</subject><subject>CD44 antigen</subject><subject>CD45 antigen</subject><subject>CD56 antigen</subject><subject>CD73 antigen</subject><subject>CD90 antigen</subject><subject>Cell surface</subject><subject>Growth factors</subject><subject>Mesenchymal stem cells</subject><subject>Orthopedics</subject><subject>Proteins</subject><subject>Stem cells</subject><subject>Stromal cells</subject><subject>Surface markers</subject><subject>Surface properties</subject><subject>Tissue engineering</subject><subject>Transplants & implants</subject><issn>1944-3285</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2023</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><recordid>eNo9jstqwzAQRU2h0JDmHwa6NsiW_OquhL4g0E32YSyNEqeWlOqRkJ_qN9ZpQ2dzYO6dO_cmmxWdEDkv2-ouW4SwZ5dpWN1Ws-x7vSMwLkSQzhhnxzOkQAokjSOE5DXKSUf_ST6Adh4URfJmsIPdgqFAVu7OBidv9O7Cy2GAwf4vjhhkGtGD9ijj4CygVdA7-5vr3QkwRTe6rUthKmEl2egx0iMghHOIZDAOEjwdBzrdZ7cax0CLK-fZ-uV5vXzLVx-v78unVX7o2pgrLgRTQopCoVaCtGqxVFyhQC4qVWHXs0LofpJZUUveCNlgUfZK1IR1x_g8e_iLPXj3lSjEzd4lb6ePm7JpO85KXrf8B3JIcEU</recordid><startdate>20230101</startdate><enddate>20230101</enddate><creator>Maslennikov, Sergey</creator><creator>Maksym, Golovakha</creator><general>Bio Tech System</general><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7QO</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FG</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AEUYN</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ARAPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BBNVY</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BGLVJ</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>LK8</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M7P</scope><scope>P5Z</scope><scope>P62</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20230101</creationdate><title>The most commonly used cell surface markers for determining mesenchymal stromal cells in stromal vascular fraction and bone marrow autologous concentrate: a systematic review</title><author>Maslennikov, Sergey ; Maksym, Golovakha</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-p98t-d3440d4c41dafd4efd8a2d3da4a345d5a9b014fb1da016c374c7a12bd46ea6903</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2023</creationdate><topic>Adipose tissue</topic><topic>Antigens</topic><topic>Autografts</topic><topic>Body fat</topic><topic>Bone marrow</topic><topic>Bone surgery</topic><topic>CD105 antigen</topic><topic>CD14 antigen</topic><topic>CD29 antigen</topic><topic>CD34 antigen</topic><topic>CD44 antigen</topic><topic>CD45 antigen</topic><topic>CD56 antigen</topic><topic>CD73 antigen</topic><topic>CD90 antigen</topic><topic>Cell surface</topic><topic>Growth factors</topic><topic>Mesenchymal stem cells</topic><topic>Orthopedics</topic><topic>Proteins</topic><topic>Stem cells</topic><topic>Stromal cells</topic><topic>Surface markers</topic><topic>Surface properties</topic><topic>Tissue engineering</topic><topic>Transplants & implants</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Maslennikov, Sergey</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Maksym, Golovakha</creatorcontrib><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Biotechnology Research Abstracts</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Sustainability</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies & Aerospace Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Technology Collection</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Biological Science Database</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies & Aerospace Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Advanced Technologies & Aerospace Collection</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Publicly Available Content Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><jtitle>Journal of biotech research</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Maslennikov, Sergey</au><au>Maksym, Golovakha</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>The most commonly used cell surface markers for determining mesenchymal stromal cells in stromal vascular fraction and bone marrow autologous concentrate: a systematic review</atitle><jtitle>Journal of biotech research</jtitle><date>2023-01-01</date><risdate>2023</risdate><volume>14</volume><spage>85</spage><epage>94</epage><pages>85-94</pages><eissn>1944-3285</eissn><abstract>The use of regenerative technologies is widely spread in modern medicine. Adipose derived stem cells (ADSCs) in stromal vascular fraction (SVF) seem to be the most advantageous for use in cell therapies and in tissue engineering. The results of bone marrow autologous concentrate (BMAC) use are very promising. The purpose of this review was to analyze and summarize the available literatures that pertain to the cell surface characterization of ADSCs and bone marrow mesenchymal stromal cells (BMMSCs) from SVF and BMAC, respectively. The results found that the most commonly reported markers for mesenchymal stromal cells (MSCs) derived from adipose tissue (AT) and bone marrow (BM) were CD29, CD44, CD73, CD90, CD105, and should be defined as positive, while CD34, CD45, CD56, CD146 should be defined as negative. For additional markers such as c- Kit (CD117), SSEA-1 (CD15), PDGFR, and CCR5X (CD195), there was no single consensus, although most authors agreed on the positive expression of HLA-ABC and STRO- 1 and the negative expression of HLA -DR. The results concluded that SVF and BMAC were not only concentrates of isolated MSCs, but also containing several additional growth factors. The main regenerative function belonged to MSCs. Therefore, their qualitative and quantitative confirmations were the keys to the effectiveness of SVF and BMAC. For this purpose, it is recommended a minimum panel of positive and negative markers for identifying MSCs, which include the positive markers of CD29, CD44, CD73, CD90, CD105 and the negative markers of CD14, CD31, CD 34, CD45, CD146.</abstract><cop>Edmond</cop><pub>Bio Tech System</pub><tpages>10</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | EISSN: 1944-3285 |
ispartof | Journal of biotech research, 2023-01, Vol.14, p.85-94 |
issn | 1944-3285 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_2789302368 |
source | EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals |
subjects | Adipose tissue Antigens Autografts Body fat Bone marrow Bone surgery CD105 antigen CD14 antigen CD29 antigen CD34 antigen CD44 antigen CD45 antigen CD56 antigen CD73 antigen CD90 antigen Cell surface Growth factors Mesenchymal stem cells Orthopedics Proteins Stem cells Stromal cells Surface markers Surface properties Tissue engineering Transplants & implants |
title | The most commonly used cell surface markers for determining mesenchymal stromal cells in stromal vascular fraction and bone marrow autologous concentrate: a systematic review |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-11T15%3A31%3A41IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=The%20most%20commonly%20used%20cell%20surface%20markers%20for%20determining%20mesenchymal%20stromal%20cells%20in%20stromal%20vascular%20fraction%20and%20bone%20marrow%20autologous%20concentrate:%20a%20systematic%20review&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20biotech%20research&rft.au=Maslennikov,%20Sergey&rft.date=2023-01-01&rft.volume=14&rft.spage=85&rft.epage=94&rft.pages=85-94&rft.eissn=1944-3285&rft_id=info:doi/&rft_dat=%3Cproquest%3E2789302368%3C/proquest%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2789302368&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |