Laparoscopic splenectomy

BackgroundThe training of surgeons and residents in laparoscopic surgery has become an important issue. The purpose of this study is to determine if the training of a laparoscopic fellow affects outcomes in patients undergoing laparoscopic splenectomy (LS).MethodsData were obtained from a prospectiv...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Surgical endoscopy 2002-06, Vol.16 (6), p.954-956
Hauptverfasser: Pace, D. E, Chiasson, P. M, Schlachta, C. M, Mamazza, J, Poulin, E. C
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:BackgroundThe training of surgeons and residents in laparoscopic surgery has become an important issue. The purpose of this study is to determine if the training of a laparoscopic fellow affects outcomes in patients undergoing laparoscopic splenectomy (LS).MethodsData were obtained from a prospectively collected database of patients who underwent LS from August 1994 to November 1999. Outcomes of the last 25 cases, performed by fellows under supervision, were compared to 25 cases performed by staff surgeons prior to the introduction of fellows.ResultsPatient demographics, preoperative platelet count, and splenic size were similar for the two groups. Outcome measures comparing the staff and the fellows group including operative time (151 vs 178 min, p=0.055), blood loss (214 vs 162 ml, p=0.40), intraoperative complications (3 vs 2, p=1.0), need for transfusion (2 vs 3, p=1.0), conversions (1 vs 0, p=1.0), length of hospital stay (3.3 vs 2.5 days, p=0.13), and postoperative complications (1 vs 2, p=1.0) were similar for the two groups.ConclusionWhen performed by a fellow under supervision, LS has the same outcomes as when the procedure is performed by the teaching staff surgeon.
ISSN:0930-2794
1432-2218
DOI:10.1007/s00464-001-8212-9