RETRACTED ARTICLE: The effects of a recruitment manoeuvre with positive end-expiratory pressure on lung compliance in patients undergoing robot-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy

The effects of a recruitment manoeuvre (RM) with positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP) on lung compliance (C LUNG ) are not well characterised in robot-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy (RARP). Patients were allocated to group R (n = 10; with an RM) or C (n = 9; without an RM). An RM inv...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of clinical monitoring and computing 2020-04, Vol.34 (2), p.303-310
Hauptverfasser: Kudoh, Osamu, Satoh, Daizoh, Hori, Naosuke, Kawagoe, Izumi, Inada, Eiichi
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:The effects of a recruitment manoeuvre (RM) with positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP) on lung compliance (C LUNG ) are not well characterised in robot-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy (RARP). Patients were allocated to group R (n = 10; with an RM) or C (n = 9; without an RM). An RM involved sustained inflation of 30 cmH 2 O for 30 s. The lungs were ventilated with volume-controlled ventilation with tidal volume of 7 mL kg −1 of predicted body weight and fraction of inspired oxygen of 0.5. End-tidal carbon dioxide pressure was maintained at normocapnia. Patients were in the horizontal lithotomy position (pre-op). After pneumoperitoneum, patients underwent RARP in a steep Trendelenburg lithotomy position at a PEEP level of 0 cmH 2 O (RARP0). An RM was used in the R group but not in the C group. Patients were then ventilated with 5 cmH 2 O PEEP for 1 h after RARP0 (RARP5.1) and 2 h after RARP0 (RARP5.2). Oesophageal pressure and airway pressure were measured for calculating C LUNG and chest wall compliance. C LUNG significantly decreased from pre-op to RARP0 and did not significantly increase from RARP0 to RARP5.1 and RARP5.2 in either group. C LUNG differed significantly between groups at RARP5.1 and RARP5.2 (103 ± 30 vs. 68 ± 11 mL cm −1 H 2 O and 106 ± 35 vs. 72 ± 9 mL cm −1 H 2 O; P  
ISSN:1387-1307
1573-2614
DOI:10.1007/s10877-019-00306-y