Preservice teachers' impressions of psychoeducational reports

The purpose of the current study was to investigate how preservice teachers perceived the utility of a psychological report for their practice (e.g., creating an individual education plan or a lesson plan). Teacher candidates, who were enrolled in an Inclusive Education course, used fictional psycho...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Psychology in the schools 2023-04, Vol.60 (4), p.1202-1215
Hauptverfasser: Friesen, Deanna C., King, Colin B., Fenesi, Barbara
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:The purpose of the current study was to investigate how preservice teachers perceived the utility of a psychological report for their practice (e.g., creating an individual education plan or a lesson plan). Teacher candidates, who were enrolled in an Inclusive Education course, used fictional psychological reports as the basis for course assignments and were then asked to rate and describe the utility of each report section. Participants reported that most sections of the report were very accessible, and that the recommendations section was the most useful for their teaching practice. Qualitative comments revealed that teacher candidates were employing a student‐focused lens and identifying information that would enable them to support students in their class. Implications are discussed with respect to how to close the knowledge gap between educators and school psychologists. Practitioner Points 1. Psychoeducational reports were rated to be highly useful by preservice teachers. 2. The recommendations section of the psychoeducational report was identified as the most valuable. 3. Preservice teachers appreciated formatting that aligned with individual education plans.
ISSN:0033-3085
1520-6807
DOI:10.1002/pits.22826