Impact of conversion surgery on survival in locally advanced pancreatic cancer patients treated with FOLFIRINOX chemotherapy

Background Locally advanced (unresectable) pancreatic cancer (LAPC) is surgically unresectable and often treated with chemotherapy. Most previous studies, that have evaluated conversion surgery after chemotherapy, included heterogeneous patients and chemotherapy regimens, making it challenging to de...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of hepato-biliary-pancreatic sciences 2023-01, Vol.30 (1), p.111-121
Hauptverfasser: Lee, Mirang, Kang, Jae Seung, Kim, Hongbeom, Kwon, Wooil, Lee, Sang Hyub, Ryu, Ji Kon, Kim, Yong‐Tae, Oh, Do‐Youn, Chie, Eui Kyu, Jang, Jin‐Young
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Background Locally advanced (unresectable) pancreatic cancer (LAPC) is surgically unresectable and often treated with chemotherapy. Most previous studies, that have evaluated conversion surgery after chemotherapy, included heterogeneous patients and chemotherapy regimens, making it challenging to determine the impact of FOLFIRINOX. The present study evaluated the survival benefit of conversion surgery in patients with LAPC who received FOLFIRINOX chemotherapy, and analyzed the prognostic factors. Methods Patients with LAPC who received FOLFIRINOX as first‐line therapy for at least four cycles were included. During chemotherapy, surgical eligibility was determined based on radiologic and metabolic response to the treatment. Clinicopathologic characteristics were compared between the curative‐intent surgery and non‐resection groups, and the prognostic factors were analyzed. Results A total of 279 patients were included. The rates of partial response (PR) and stable disease (SD) were 34.1% and 51.4%, respectively, and 16.8% patients underwent curative‐intent surgery. The median survival was significantly longer in the resection group than in the non‐resection group (56 vs 21 months, P 
ISSN:1868-6974
1868-6982
DOI:10.1002/jhbp.1050