Importance of magnetic resonance imaging and prostate‐specific membrane antigen PET‐CT in patients treated with salvage radical prostatectomy for radiorecurrent prostate cancer

Background Accurate staging and identification of optimal candidates for local salvage therapy, such as salvage radical prostatectomy (SRP), is necessary to ensure optimal care in patients with radiorecurrent prostate cancer (PCa). We aimed to analyze performance of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:The Prostate 2023-03, Vol.83 (4), p.385-391
Hauptverfasser: Rajwa, Pawel, Pfister, David, Rieger, Constantin, Heidenreich, Julian, Drzezga, Alexander, Persigehl, Thorsten, Shariat, Shahrokh F., Heidenreich, Axel
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Background Accurate staging and identification of optimal candidates for local salvage therapy, such as salvage radical prostatectomy (SRP), is necessary to ensure optimal care in patients with radiorecurrent prostate cancer (PCa). We aimed to analyze performance of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and prostate‐specific membrane antigen (PSMA)‐positron emission tomography (PET)/computed tomography (CT) for predicting pathologic nonorgan confined disease (pT3) and lymph node involvement (pN+) in patients treated with SRP for radiorecurrent PCa. Methods We retrospectively reviewed the institutional database to identify patients who underwent MRI or 68Ga‐PSMA‐PET/CT before SRP for radiorecurrent PCa. The diagnostic estimates of MRI and PSMA‐PET/CT for pT3 and pN+, were calculated. Results We identified 113 patients with radiorecurrent PCa who underwent preoperative MRI followed by SRP; 53 had preoperative 68Ga‐PSMA‐PET/CT. For the detection of pT3 disease, the overall accuracy of MRI was 70% (95% confidence interval [CI] 61−78), sensitivity 40% (95% CI 26−55) and specificity 94% (95% CI 85−98); PSMA‐PET/CT had slightly higher accuracy of 77% (95% CI 64−88), and higher sensitivity of 90% (95% CI 68−99), but lower specificity of 70% (95% CI 51−84). For pN+ disease, MRI had poor sensitivity of 14% (95% CI 3−36), specificity of 50 (95% CI 39−61) and total accuracy of 43% (95% CI 34−53); PSMA‐PET/CT had an accuracy of 85% (95% CI 72−93), sensitivity of 27% (95% CI 6−61), and specificity of 100% (95% CI 92−100). Conclusion In patients with radiorecurrent PCa, both, MRI, and 68Ga‐PSMA PET/CT are valuable tools for the pre‐SRP staging and should be integrated into the standard workup. For lymph node metastases, 68Ga‐PSMA PET/CT is a strong rule‐in test with nearly perfect specificity; in contrast MRI had a low accuracy for lymph node metastases.
ISSN:0270-4137
1097-0045
DOI:10.1002/pros.24470