Comparison of specific segmentation methods used for copy move detection

In this digital age, the widespread use of digital images and the availability of image editors have made the credibility of images controversial. To confirm the credibility of digital images many image forgery detection types are arises, copy-move forgery is consisting of transforming any image by...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:International journal of electrical and computer engineering (Malacca, Malacca) Malacca), 2023-04, Vol.13 (2), p.2363
Hauptverfasser: Abdulazeem Ahmed, Eman, Alzaqebah, Malek, Jawarneh, Sana, Saad Alqurni, Jehad, A. Alghamdi, Fahad, Alfagham, Hayat, Abdel Jawad, Lubna Mahmoud, A. Badawi, Usama, Alsmadi, Mutasem K., Almarashdeh, Ibrahim
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:In this digital age, the widespread use of digital images and the availability of image editors have made the credibility of images controversial. To confirm the credibility of digital images many image forgery detection types are arises, copy-move forgery is consisting of transforming any image by duplicating a part of the image, to add or hide existing objects. Several methods have been proposed in the literature to detect copy-move forgery, these methods use the key point-based and block-based to find the duplicated areas. However, the key point-based and block-based have a drawback of the ability to handle the smooth region. In addition, image segmentation plays a vital role in changing the representation of the image in a meaningful form for analysis. Hence, we execute a comparison study for segmentation based on two clustering algorithms (i.e., k-means and super pixel segmentation with density-based spatial clustering of applications with noise (DBSCAN)), the paper compares methods in term of the accuracy of detecting the forgery regions of digital images. K-means shows better performance compared with DBSCAN and with other techniques in the literature.
ISSN:2088-8708
2722-2578
2088-8708
DOI:10.11591/ijece.v13i2.pp2363-2374