Evaluation of S-substituted-2-mercaptobenzimidazole analogs for urease inhibitory and DPPH radical scavenging potential: synthesis, bioactivity, and molecular docking study

Several S -substituted-2-mercaptobenzimidazole derivatives 1 – 34 were synthesized by reacting 2-mercaptobenzimidazole with a variety of substituted benzyl bromide and characterized with the help of various spectroscopic techniques. All synthetic compounds were evaluated for urease inhibitory and DP...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of the Iranian Chemical Society 2023, Vol.20 (1), p.175-191
Hauptverfasser: Ata, Amber, Khan, Khalid Mohammed, Lateef, Mehreen, Salar, Uzma, Anwar, Ayaz, Wadood, Abdul, Ur Rehman, Ashfaq, Hameed, Shehryar, Zafar, Fatima, Taha, Muhammad, Perveen, Shahnaz
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Several S -substituted-2-mercaptobenzimidazole derivatives 1 – 34 were synthesized by reacting 2-mercaptobenzimidazole with a variety of substituted benzyl bromide and characterized with the help of various spectroscopic techniques. All synthetic compounds were evaluated for urease inhibitory and DPPH radical scavenging activities. Compounds showed significant to moderate urease inhibitory activity in the range of IC 50  = 16.8 ± 0.76–74.3 ± 0.72 µM, in comparison with the standard thiourea (IC 50  = 22.4 ± 0.29 µM). It is worth stating that all molecules exhibited noteworthy DPPH radical scavenging potential with IC 50 values of 15.5 ± 0.58 to 89.3 ± 0.12 µM when compared with the standard butylated hydroxy anisole BHA (IC 50  = 44.2 ± 0.45 µM). A structure–activity relationship (SAR) was presented by analyzing the impact of varying substitutions on urease inhibitory potential. A molecular docking study was done to streamline the binding interactions of ligands (synthetic molecules) with the active pocket of urease enzyme. In addition, cytotoxicity of the most potent compounds 1–4 , 14 , 18 , 20 , 28 , and 32 , was also evaluated, and all were found to be non-cytotoxic.
ISSN:1735-207X
1735-2428
DOI:10.1007/s13738-022-02653-1