Approaching Peak Ground Truth

Machine learning models are typically evaluated by computing similarity with reference annotations and trained by maximizing similarity with such. Especially in the biomedical domain, annotations are subjective and suffer from low inter- and intra-rater reliability. Since annotations only reflect on...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:arXiv.org 2023-03
Hauptverfasser: Kofler, Florian, Wahle, Johannes, Ezhov, Ivan, Wagner, Sophia, Al-Maskari, Rami, Gryska, Emilia, Todorov, Mihail, Bukas, Christina, Meissen, Felix, Peng, Tingying, Ertürk, Ali, Rueckert, Daniel, Heckemann, Rolf, Kirschke, Jan, Zimmer, Claus, Wiestler, Benedikt, Menze, Bjoern, Piraud, Marie
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Machine learning models are typically evaluated by computing similarity with reference annotations and trained by maximizing similarity with such. Especially in the biomedical domain, annotations are subjective and suffer from low inter- and intra-rater reliability. Since annotations only reflect one interpretation of the real world, this can lead to sub-optimal predictions even though the model achieves high similarity scores. Here, the theoretical concept of PGT is introduced. PGT marks the point beyond which an increase in similarity with the \emph{reference annotation} stops translating to better RWMP. Additionally, a quantitative technique to approximate PGT by computing inter- and intra-rater reliability is proposed. Finally, four categories of PGT-aware strategies to evaluate and improve model performance are reviewed.
ISSN:2331-8422