Engaged and/or Burnt Out? Finnish and South African Doctoral Students' Experiences

Purpose: Doctoral students' ill-being in terms of stress, exhaustion and high levels of mental health problems has been well documented. Yet, the well-being of doctoral students is more than the absence of these negative symptoms. The number of studies exploring the combination of positive and...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Studies in Graduate and Postdoctoral Education 2023-01, Vol.14 (1), p.1-18
Hauptverfasser: Pyhältö, Kirsi, Peltonen, Jouni, Anttila, Henrika, Frick, Liezel Liezel, de Jager, Phillip
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Purpose: Doctoral students' ill-being in terms of stress, exhaustion and high levels of mental health problems has been well documented. Yet, the well-being of doctoral students is more than the absence of these negative symptoms. The number of studies exploring the combination of positive and negative attributes of doctoral students' well-being is limited. Therefore, this study aims to focus on exploring individual variation in doctoral students' experienced engagement and burnout across two distinct socio-cultural contexts in Finland and in South Africa. Design/methodology/approach: A total of 884 doctoral students from Finland (n = 391) and South Africa (n = 493) responded to the cross-cultural Doctoral Experience Survey. The data were quantitatively analyzed. Findings: Altogether four distinctive engagement-burnout profiles were detected, including engaged, engaged-exhausted, moderately engaged-burnout and burnout profiles. Differences between the Finnish and South African students were identified in profile emphasis. The profiles were also related to several study progress attributes such as drop-out intentions, time-to-candidacy and satisfaction with study. Originality/value: This study provides new understanding on doctoral students' well-being by focusing on both positive and negative attributes and exploring doctoral students' discrepant profiles with a cross-country design.
ISSN:2398-4686
2398-4686
2398-4694
DOI:10.1108/SGPE-02-2021-0013