Type of CIDR but not eCG administration affected pregnancy per AI in Holstein heifers subjected to a 5-day estrus synchronization protocol

This study compared the effects of CIDR type and eCG treatment on ovarian follicular dynamics, estrus response and pregnancy per AI (P/AI) in Holstein heifers subjected to a 5-d estrus synchronization protocol. On Day 0, heifers (n = 133) received either a new or a once-used CIDR. On Day 5, CIDR was...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of Applied Animal Research 2022-12, Vol.50 (1), p.504-510
Hauptverfasser: Sanz, Albina, Gobikrushanth, Mohanathas, Colazo, Marcos G.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 510
container_issue 1
container_start_page 504
container_title Journal of Applied Animal Research
container_volume 50
creator Sanz, Albina
Gobikrushanth, Mohanathas
Colazo, Marcos G.
description This study compared the effects of CIDR type and eCG treatment on ovarian follicular dynamics, estrus response and pregnancy per AI (P/AI) in Holstein heifers subjected to a 5-d estrus synchronization protocol. On Day 0, heifers (n = 133) received either a new or a once-used CIDR. On Day 5, CIDR was removed, 500 μg cloprostenol administered and heifers received or not 300 IU eCG (2 × 2 design). Heifers in estrus were inseminated 12 h after first observation. All heifers without estrus by 84 h after CIDR removal received 100 μg GnRH concurrently with AI. Ultrasonography was done in a subset of 77 heifers at CIDR insertion and removal, at AI and every 12 h after AI to determine follicular dynamics. Diameter of largest follicle at CIDR removal and AI was larger in heifers given a used CIDR (P 
doi_str_mv 10.1080/09712119.2022.2106989
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_infor</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2758460092</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><doaj_id>oai_doaj_org_article_fe722c3ee86d4fb883f2db15300c60d6</doaj_id><sourcerecordid>2758460092</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c329t-84400491ae97457ec81dfb19efcae22fe4cb55a98f57e5d8f2d0f1ac5c0833de3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kd9qHCEUxofSQkOaRygIuZ6tf8ZZvUvYtslCoFDSa3H0mLjM6lQdyvQR8tRxM0kv641yznd-no-vaT4TvCFY4C9YbgklRG4opnRDCe6lkO-as1rvWiK67v3Lm7Qn0cfmIucDrqeTjPbkrHm6XyZA0aHd_utPNMwFhVgQ7G6QtkcffC5JFx8D0s6BKWDRlOAh6GAWNEFC13vkA7qNYy5QH4_gHaSM8jwcVnmJSCPeWr0gqLC59pZgHlMM_u9KnlIs0cTxU_PB6THDxet93vz6_u1-d9ve_bjZ767vWsOoLG21dFqfaKgO-RaMINYNRIIzGih10JmBcy2Fq01uhaMWO6INN1gwZoGdN_uVa6M-qCn5o06Litqrl0JMD0qn4s0IysGWUsMARG87NwjBKm0gnGFsemz7yrpcWdXE77kaVIc4p1DXV3TLRddjLGlV8VVlUsw5gfv3K8HqlKJ6S1GdUlSvKda5q3XOBxfTUf-JabSq6GWMyaWagc-K_R_xDL7mpOI</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Website</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2758460092</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Type of CIDR but not eCG administration affected pregnancy per AI in Holstein heifers subjected to a 5-day estrus synchronization protocol</title><source>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</source><source>Access via Taylor &amp; Francis (Open Access Collection)</source><source>Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals</source><creator>Sanz, Albina ; Gobikrushanth, Mohanathas ; Colazo, Marcos G.</creator><creatorcontrib>Sanz, Albina ; Gobikrushanth, Mohanathas ; Colazo, Marcos G.</creatorcontrib><description>This study compared the effects of CIDR type and eCG treatment on ovarian follicular dynamics, estrus response and pregnancy per AI (P/AI) in Holstein heifers subjected to a 5-d estrus synchronization protocol. On Day 0, heifers (n = 133) received either a new or a once-used CIDR. On Day 5, CIDR was removed, 500 μg cloprostenol administered and heifers received or not 300 IU eCG (2 × 2 design). Heifers in estrus were inseminated 12 h after first observation. All heifers without estrus by 84 h after CIDR removal received 100 μg GnRH concurrently with AI. Ultrasonography was done in a subset of 77 heifers at CIDR insertion and removal, at AI and every 12 h after AI to determine follicular dynamics. Diameter of largest follicle at CIDR removal and AI was larger in heifers given a used CIDR (P &lt; .05). The overall estrus response and ovulation (85.0 and 95.5%) did not differ between CIDR types, heifers given a new CIDR had greater P/AI (67.2 vs. 42.6%; P = .004). In summary, P/AI was reduced in dairy heifers treated with a used CIDR, despite having larger preovulatory follicles at AI. In addition, eCG treatment did not affect follicular dynamics, estrus response nor P/AI.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0971-2119</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 0974-1844</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1080/09712119.2022.2106989</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Abingdon: Taylor &amp; Francis</publisher><subject>Barley ; Beef ; Cattle ; eCG ; Estrus ; Fertility ; Follicles ; follicular development ; Gonadotropin-releasing hormone ; Ovaries ; Ovulation ; Pregnancy ; shortened protocol ; Synchronization ; timed-AI</subject><ispartof>Journal of Applied Animal Research, 2022-12, Vol.50 (1), p.504-510</ispartof><rights>2022 The Author(s). Published by Informa UK Limited, trading as Taylor &amp; Francis Group 2022</rights><rights>2022 The Author(s). Published by Informa UK Limited, trading as Taylor &amp; Francis Group. This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution License http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c329t-84400491ae97457ec81dfb19efcae22fe4cb55a98f57e5d8f2d0f1ac5c0833de3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.tandfonline.com/doi/pdf/10.1080/09712119.2022.2106989$$EPDF$$P50$$Ginformaworld$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/09712119.2022.2106989$$EHTML$$P50$$Ginformaworld$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>315,782,786,866,2106,27511,27933,27934,59152,59153</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Sanz, Albina</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gobikrushanth, Mohanathas</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Colazo, Marcos G.</creatorcontrib><title>Type of CIDR but not eCG administration affected pregnancy per AI in Holstein heifers subjected to a 5-day estrus synchronization protocol</title><title>Journal of Applied Animal Research</title><description>This study compared the effects of CIDR type and eCG treatment on ovarian follicular dynamics, estrus response and pregnancy per AI (P/AI) in Holstein heifers subjected to a 5-d estrus synchronization protocol. On Day 0, heifers (n = 133) received either a new or a once-used CIDR. On Day 5, CIDR was removed, 500 μg cloprostenol administered and heifers received or not 300 IU eCG (2 × 2 design). Heifers in estrus were inseminated 12 h after first observation. All heifers without estrus by 84 h after CIDR removal received 100 μg GnRH concurrently with AI. Ultrasonography was done in a subset of 77 heifers at CIDR insertion and removal, at AI and every 12 h after AI to determine follicular dynamics. Diameter of largest follicle at CIDR removal and AI was larger in heifers given a used CIDR (P &lt; .05). The overall estrus response and ovulation (85.0 and 95.5%) did not differ between CIDR types, heifers given a new CIDR had greater P/AI (67.2 vs. 42.6%; P = .004). In summary, P/AI was reduced in dairy heifers treated with a used CIDR, despite having larger preovulatory follicles at AI. In addition, eCG treatment did not affect follicular dynamics, estrus response nor P/AI.</description><subject>Barley</subject><subject>Beef</subject><subject>Cattle</subject><subject>eCG</subject><subject>Estrus</subject><subject>Fertility</subject><subject>Follicles</subject><subject>follicular development</subject><subject>Gonadotropin-releasing hormone</subject><subject>Ovaries</subject><subject>Ovulation</subject><subject>Pregnancy</subject><subject>shortened protocol</subject><subject>Synchronization</subject><subject>timed-AI</subject><issn>0971-2119</issn><issn>0974-1844</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2022</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>0YH</sourceid><sourceid>8G5</sourceid><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><sourceid>GUQSH</sourceid><sourceid>M2O</sourceid><sourceid>DOA</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kd9qHCEUxofSQkOaRygIuZ6tf8ZZvUvYtslCoFDSa3H0mLjM6lQdyvQR8tRxM0kv641yznd-no-vaT4TvCFY4C9YbgklRG4opnRDCe6lkO-as1rvWiK67v3Lm7Qn0cfmIucDrqeTjPbkrHm6XyZA0aHd_utPNMwFhVgQ7G6QtkcffC5JFx8D0s6BKWDRlOAh6GAWNEFC13vkA7qNYy5QH4_gHaSM8jwcVnmJSCPeWr0gqLC59pZgHlMM_u9KnlIs0cTxU_PB6THDxet93vz6_u1-d9ve_bjZ767vWsOoLG21dFqfaKgO-RaMINYNRIIzGih10JmBcy2Fq01uhaMWO6INN1gwZoGdN_uVa6M-qCn5o06Litqrl0JMD0qn4s0IysGWUsMARG87NwjBKm0gnGFsemz7yrpcWdXE77kaVIc4p1DXV3TLRddjLGlV8VVlUsw5gfv3K8HqlKJ6S1GdUlSvKda5q3XOBxfTUf-JabSq6GWMyaWagc-K_R_xDL7mpOI</recordid><startdate>20221231</startdate><enddate>20221231</enddate><creator>Sanz, Albina</creator><creator>Gobikrushanth, Mohanathas</creator><creator>Colazo, Marcos G.</creator><general>Taylor &amp; Francis</general><general>Taylor &amp; Francis Ltd</general><general>Taylor &amp; Francis Group</general><scope>0YH</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7QG</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8G5</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>DOA</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20221231</creationdate><title>Type of CIDR but not eCG administration affected pregnancy per AI in Holstein heifers subjected to a 5-day estrus synchronization protocol</title><author>Sanz, Albina ; Gobikrushanth, Mohanathas ; Colazo, Marcos G.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c329t-84400491ae97457ec81dfb19efcae22fe4cb55a98f57e5d8f2d0f1ac5c0833de3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2022</creationdate><topic>Barley</topic><topic>Beef</topic><topic>Cattle</topic><topic>eCG</topic><topic>Estrus</topic><topic>Fertility</topic><topic>Follicles</topic><topic>follicular development</topic><topic>Gonadotropin-releasing hormone</topic><topic>Ovaries</topic><topic>Ovulation</topic><topic>Pregnancy</topic><topic>shortened protocol</topic><topic>Synchronization</topic><topic>timed-AI</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Sanz, Albina</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gobikrushanth, Mohanathas</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Colazo, Marcos G.</creatorcontrib><collection>Access via Taylor &amp; Francis (Open Access Collection)</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Animal Behavior Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Research Library (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>Research Library</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</collection><jtitle>Journal of Applied Animal Research</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Sanz, Albina</au><au>Gobikrushanth, Mohanathas</au><au>Colazo, Marcos G.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Type of CIDR but not eCG administration affected pregnancy per AI in Holstein heifers subjected to a 5-day estrus synchronization protocol</atitle><jtitle>Journal of Applied Animal Research</jtitle><date>2022-12-31</date><risdate>2022</risdate><volume>50</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>504</spage><epage>510</epage><pages>504-510</pages><issn>0971-2119</issn><eissn>0974-1844</eissn><abstract>This study compared the effects of CIDR type and eCG treatment on ovarian follicular dynamics, estrus response and pregnancy per AI (P/AI) in Holstein heifers subjected to a 5-d estrus synchronization protocol. On Day 0, heifers (n = 133) received either a new or a once-used CIDR. On Day 5, CIDR was removed, 500 μg cloprostenol administered and heifers received or not 300 IU eCG (2 × 2 design). Heifers in estrus were inseminated 12 h after first observation. All heifers without estrus by 84 h after CIDR removal received 100 μg GnRH concurrently with AI. Ultrasonography was done in a subset of 77 heifers at CIDR insertion and removal, at AI and every 12 h after AI to determine follicular dynamics. Diameter of largest follicle at CIDR removal and AI was larger in heifers given a used CIDR (P &lt; .05). The overall estrus response and ovulation (85.0 and 95.5%) did not differ between CIDR types, heifers given a new CIDR had greater P/AI (67.2 vs. 42.6%; P = .004). In summary, P/AI was reduced in dairy heifers treated with a used CIDR, despite having larger preovulatory follicles at AI. In addition, eCG treatment did not affect follicular dynamics, estrus response nor P/AI.</abstract><cop>Abingdon</cop><pub>Taylor &amp; Francis</pub><doi>10.1080/09712119.2022.2106989</doi><tpages>7</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0971-2119
ispartof Journal of Applied Animal Research, 2022-12, Vol.50 (1), p.504-510
issn 0971-2119
0974-1844
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_2758460092
source DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals; Access via Taylor & Francis (Open Access Collection); Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals
subjects Barley
Beef
Cattle
eCG
Estrus
Fertility
Follicles
follicular development
Gonadotropin-releasing hormone
Ovaries
Ovulation
Pregnancy
shortened protocol
Synchronization
timed-AI
title Type of CIDR but not eCG administration affected pregnancy per AI in Holstein heifers subjected to a 5-day estrus synchronization protocol
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-01T03%3A25%3A12IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_infor&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Type%20of%20CIDR%20but%20not%20eCG%20administration%20affected%20pregnancy%20per%20AI%20in%20Holstein%20heifers%20subjected%20to%20a%205-day%20estrus%20synchronization%20protocol&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20Applied%20Animal%20Research&rft.au=Sanz,%20Albina&rft.date=2022-12-31&rft.volume=50&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=504&rft.epage=510&rft.pages=504-510&rft.issn=0971-2119&rft.eissn=0974-1844&rft_id=info:doi/10.1080/09712119.2022.2106989&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_infor%3E2758460092%3C/proquest_infor%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2758460092&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_doaj_id=oai_doaj_org_article_fe722c3ee86d4fb883f2db15300c60d6&rfr_iscdi=true