Metal porphyrins (M = Ti, Fe, Co, Ni, Cu, or Zn) as potential catalysts for the oxidation of CO by N2O: insight from DFT calculations

The oxidation of CO by N2O over M–porphyrin (M = Ti, Fe, Co, Ni, Cu, and Zn) catalysts has been investigated via density functional theory calculations. The whole reaction process is divided into two steps: the catalytic decomposition of N2O that breaks the N–O bond resulting in O–M active species,...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:New journal of chemistry 2023-01, Vol.47 (1), p.421-427
Hauptverfasser: Wang, Shutao, Liu, Zhao, Ye, Yanjie, Xu, Meng, Yang, Pengcheng, Zhang, Zhengze, Qiu, Yifeng, Junqiang Lei
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:The oxidation of CO by N2O over M–porphyrin (M = Ti, Fe, Co, Ni, Cu, and Zn) catalysts has been investigated via density functional theory calculations. The whole reaction process is divided into two steps: the catalytic decomposition of N2O that breaks the N–O bond resulting in O–M active species, and the carbon atoms of the CO molecule reaction with O–M to form CO2. For the rate-controlled step of the reaction, the porphyrins of different metal centers appear in different positions. The barrier height of N2O decomposition on Ti–porphyrin is 3.8 kcal mol−1, and the barrier height of CO oxidation is 21.9 kcal mol−1. The rate-controlled step appears in the process of oxidation of CO. However, for Fe–porphyrin, the barrier height of N2O decomposition is 24.2 kcal mol−1, and the barrier height of CO oxidation is 11.4 kcal mol−1. The rate-controlled step appears in the process of N2O decomposition. For the catalytic decomposition of N2O, the Ti–porphyrin has a low activation energy barrier, which may be due to the smaller gap between the highest occupied molecular orbital (HOMO) of the metal porphyrin and the lowest unoccupied molecular orbital (LUMO) of N2O for Ti–porphyrin compared to Fe–porphyrin.
ISSN:1144-0546
1369-9261
DOI:10.1039/d2nj04440d