Testing of crystalline silicon-based photoelectric and photothermal batteries in real climate conditions and comparison of parameter changes

The article examines the changes in electrical parameters of three types of photovoltaic batteries (PV) and photothermal batteries (PVT) based on them, installed on a portable device with the increased intensity of solar radiation using reflective planes. In this case, without changing the position...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of physics. Conference series 2022-12, Vol.2388 (1), p.12128
Hauptverfasser: Muminov, R A, Tursunov, M N, Sabirov, Kh, Abilfayziyev, Sh N, Yuldoshov, B A, Toshpulatov, S F
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page
container_issue 1
container_start_page 12128
container_title Journal of physics. Conference series
container_volume 2388
creator Muminov, R A
Tursunov, M N
Sabirov, Kh
Abilfayziyev, Sh N
Yuldoshov, B A
Toshpulatov, S F
description The article examines the changes in electrical parameters of three types of photovoltaic batteries (PV) and photothermal batteries (PVT) based on them, installed on a portable device with the increased intensity of solar radiation using reflective planes. In this case, without changing the position of the PV and PVT in the device, like the “network” stations, it was set so that the solar radiation falls vertically, as in the time of the rising of the sun, directed to the south. This natural experiment served two purposes. The first is to determine the optimal type for the climate when the various types of PVs available in the local commercial market are used in hot climates. Second, the results of determining and comparing the changes in parameters and energy efficiency of PV and PVT with the same base and capacity at the same time under the same conditions are presented. From the results of the experimental tests, it was clear that the best indicators in terms of short-circuit current, open circuit voltage and power in hot climates are monocrystalline PV and its base PVT. Among the PVs, the lowest values were observed in front and black back coating photoelectric battery. Among the PVTs, it was observed in the polycrystalline silicon photothermal battery. When all types of PVTs were cooled by passing water with a temperature of 18-20°C, sharp electrical changes were observed in monocrystalline silicon with a black back coating. The conclusion from the results of this change is that the use of black back coating photoelectric battery in cold climate regions leads to higher efficiency. Compared to conventional PV, PVT has been observed to generate 1.3-1.4 times more electricity depending on the type of material.
doi_str_mv 10.1088/1742-6596/2388/1/012128
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_iop_j</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2753731638</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2753731638</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c1698-f6c2d58961135b5449c24962d78abd274814d49678b9a83df4e9b91b9a604ef63</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkM1OAyEUhYnRxFp9Bklcjx1ghp-lafxLmripa8IwTEszAyPQRd_Bh5axTV3KhnsP95wbPgDuUfmISs4XiFW4oLWgC0ymdlEijDC_ALPzy-W55vwa3MS4K0uSD5uB77WJyboN9B3U4RCT6nvrDIy2t9q7olHRtHDc-uRNb3QKVkPlTkramjCoHjYqJROsidA6GExWdG8HlQzMEa1N1rv469J-GFWw0btpXy7VYLIT6q1yGxNvwVWn-mjuTvccfL48r5dvxerj9X35tCo0ooIXHdW4rbmgCJG6qatKaFwJilvGVdNiVnFUtVlgvBGKk7arjGgEyg0tK9NRMgcPx9wx-K99BiB3fh9cXikxqwkjiBKep9hxSgcfYzCdHEP-VThIVMoJvZygygmwnNBLJI_os5McndaPf9H_uX4AleWIpA</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2753731638</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Testing of crystalline silicon-based photoelectric and photothermal batteries in real climate conditions and comparison of parameter changes</title><source>Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals</source><source>Institute of Physics Open Access Journal Titles</source><source>IOPscience extra</source><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><source>Free Full-Text Journals in Chemistry</source><creator>Muminov, R A ; Tursunov, M N ; Sabirov, Kh ; Abilfayziyev, Sh N ; Yuldoshov, B A ; Toshpulatov, S F</creator><creatorcontrib>Muminov, R A ; Tursunov, M N ; Sabirov, Kh ; Abilfayziyev, Sh N ; Yuldoshov, B A ; Toshpulatov, S F</creatorcontrib><description>The article examines the changes in electrical parameters of three types of photovoltaic batteries (PV) and photothermal batteries (PVT) based on them, installed on a portable device with the increased intensity of solar radiation using reflective planes. In this case, without changing the position of the PV and PVT in the device, like the “network” stations, it was set so that the solar radiation falls vertically, as in the time of the rising of the sun, directed to the south. This natural experiment served two purposes. The first is to determine the optimal type for the climate when the various types of PVs available in the local commercial market are used in hot climates. Second, the results of determining and comparing the changes in parameters and energy efficiency of PV and PVT with the same base and capacity at the same time under the same conditions are presented. From the results of the experimental tests, it was clear that the best indicators in terms of short-circuit current, open circuit voltage and power in hot climates are monocrystalline PV and its base PVT. Among the PVs, the lowest values were observed in front and black back coating photoelectric battery. Among the PVTs, it was observed in the polycrystalline silicon photothermal battery. When all types of PVTs were cooled by passing water with a temperature of 18-20°C, sharp electrical changes were observed in monocrystalline silicon with a black back coating. The conclusion from the results of this change is that the use of black back coating photoelectric battery in cold climate regions leads to higher efficiency. Compared to conventional PV, PVT has been observed to generate 1.3-1.4 times more electricity depending on the type of material.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1742-6588</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1742-6596</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1088/1742-6596/2388/1/012128</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Bristol: IOP Publishing</publisher><subject>Circuits ; Climate ; Coating ; Hot climates ; Open circuit voltage ; Parameters ; Photoelectricity ; Photovoltaic cells ; Physics ; Polysilicon ; Portable equipment ; Radiation ; Short circuit currents ; Silicon ; Solar radiation</subject><ispartof>Journal of physics. Conference series, 2022-12, Vol.2388 (1), p.12128</ispartof><rights>Published under licence by IOP Publishing Ltd</rights><rights>Published under licence by IOP Publishing Ltd. This work is published under http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/ (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c1698-f6c2d58961135b5449c24962d78abd274814d49678b9a83df4e9b91b9a604ef63</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://iopscience.iop.org/article/10.1088/1742-6596/2388/1/012128/pdf$$EPDF$$P50$$Giop$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><link.rule.ids>315,782,786,27933,27934,38877,38899,53849,53876</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Muminov, R A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tursunov, M N</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sabirov, Kh</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Abilfayziyev, Sh N</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yuldoshov, B A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Toshpulatov, S F</creatorcontrib><title>Testing of crystalline silicon-based photoelectric and photothermal batteries in real climate conditions and comparison of parameter changes</title><title>Journal of physics. Conference series</title><addtitle>J. Phys.: Conf. Ser</addtitle><description>The article examines the changes in electrical parameters of three types of photovoltaic batteries (PV) and photothermal batteries (PVT) based on them, installed on a portable device with the increased intensity of solar radiation using reflective planes. In this case, without changing the position of the PV and PVT in the device, like the “network” stations, it was set so that the solar radiation falls vertically, as in the time of the rising of the sun, directed to the south. This natural experiment served two purposes. The first is to determine the optimal type for the climate when the various types of PVs available in the local commercial market are used in hot climates. Second, the results of determining and comparing the changes in parameters and energy efficiency of PV and PVT with the same base and capacity at the same time under the same conditions are presented. From the results of the experimental tests, it was clear that the best indicators in terms of short-circuit current, open circuit voltage and power in hot climates are monocrystalline PV and its base PVT. Among the PVs, the lowest values were observed in front and black back coating photoelectric battery. Among the PVTs, it was observed in the polycrystalline silicon photothermal battery. When all types of PVTs were cooled by passing water with a temperature of 18-20°C, sharp electrical changes were observed in monocrystalline silicon with a black back coating. The conclusion from the results of this change is that the use of black back coating photoelectric battery in cold climate regions leads to higher efficiency. Compared to conventional PV, PVT has been observed to generate 1.3-1.4 times more electricity depending on the type of material.</description><subject>Circuits</subject><subject>Climate</subject><subject>Coating</subject><subject>Hot climates</subject><subject>Open circuit voltage</subject><subject>Parameters</subject><subject>Photoelectricity</subject><subject>Photovoltaic cells</subject><subject>Physics</subject><subject>Polysilicon</subject><subject>Portable equipment</subject><subject>Radiation</subject><subject>Short circuit currents</subject><subject>Silicon</subject><subject>Solar radiation</subject><issn>1742-6588</issn><issn>1742-6596</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2022</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>O3W</sourceid><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><recordid>eNqFkM1OAyEUhYnRxFp9Bklcjx1ghp-lafxLmripa8IwTEszAyPQRd_Bh5axTV3KhnsP95wbPgDuUfmISs4XiFW4oLWgC0ymdlEijDC_ALPzy-W55vwa3MS4K0uSD5uB77WJyboN9B3U4RCT6nvrDIy2t9q7olHRtHDc-uRNb3QKVkPlTkramjCoHjYqJROsidA6GExWdG8HlQzMEa1N1rv469J-GFWw0btpXy7VYLIT6q1yGxNvwVWn-mjuTvccfL48r5dvxerj9X35tCo0ooIXHdW4rbmgCJG6qatKaFwJilvGVdNiVnFUtVlgvBGKk7arjGgEyg0tK9NRMgcPx9wx-K99BiB3fh9cXikxqwkjiBKep9hxSgcfYzCdHEP-VThIVMoJvZygygmwnNBLJI_os5McndaPf9H_uX4AleWIpA</recordid><startdate>20221201</startdate><enddate>20221201</enddate><creator>Muminov, R A</creator><creator>Tursunov, M N</creator><creator>Sabirov, Kh</creator><creator>Abilfayziyev, Sh N</creator><creator>Yuldoshov, B A</creator><creator>Toshpulatov, S F</creator><general>IOP Publishing</general><scope>O3W</scope><scope>TSCCA</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FG</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ARAPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BGLVJ</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>H8D</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>L7M</scope><scope>P5Z</scope><scope>P62</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20221201</creationdate><title>Testing of crystalline silicon-based photoelectric and photothermal batteries in real climate conditions and comparison of parameter changes</title><author>Muminov, R A ; Tursunov, M N ; Sabirov, Kh ; Abilfayziyev, Sh N ; Yuldoshov, B A ; Toshpulatov, S F</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c1698-f6c2d58961135b5449c24962d78abd274814d49678b9a83df4e9b91b9a604ef63</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2022</creationdate><topic>Circuits</topic><topic>Climate</topic><topic>Coating</topic><topic>Hot climates</topic><topic>Open circuit voltage</topic><topic>Parameters</topic><topic>Photoelectricity</topic><topic>Photovoltaic cells</topic><topic>Physics</topic><topic>Polysilicon</topic><topic>Portable equipment</topic><topic>Radiation</topic><topic>Short circuit currents</topic><topic>Silicon</topic><topic>Solar radiation</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Muminov, R A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tursunov, M N</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sabirov, Kh</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Abilfayziyev, Sh N</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yuldoshov, B A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Toshpulatov, S F</creatorcontrib><collection>Institute of Physics Open Access Journal Titles</collection><collection>IOPscience (Open Access)</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies &amp; Aerospace Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Aerospace Database</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies Database with Aerospace</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies &amp; Aerospace Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Advanced Technologies &amp; Aerospace Collection</collection><collection>Access via ProQuest (Open Access)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><jtitle>Journal of physics. Conference series</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Muminov, R A</au><au>Tursunov, M N</au><au>Sabirov, Kh</au><au>Abilfayziyev, Sh N</au><au>Yuldoshov, B A</au><au>Toshpulatov, S F</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Testing of crystalline silicon-based photoelectric and photothermal batteries in real climate conditions and comparison of parameter changes</atitle><jtitle>Journal of physics. Conference series</jtitle><addtitle>J. Phys.: Conf. Ser</addtitle><date>2022-12-01</date><risdate>2022</risdate><volume>2388</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>12128</spage><pages>12128-</pages><issn>1742-6588</issn><eissn>1742-6596</eissn><abstract>The article examines the changes in electrical parameters of three types of photovoltaic batteries (PV) and photothermal batteries (PVT) based on them, installed on a portable device with the increased intensity of solar radiation using reflective planes. In this case, without changing the position of the PV and PVT in the device, like the “network” stations, it was set so that the solar radiation falls vertically, as in the time of the rising of the sun, directed to the south. This natural experiment served two purposes. The first is to determine the optimal type for the climate when the various types of PVs available in the local commercial market are used in hot climates. Second, the results of determining and comparing the changes in parameters and energy efficiency of PV and PVT with the same base and capacity at the same time under the same conditions are presented. From the results of the experimental tests, it was clear that the best indicators in terms of short-circuit current, open circuit voltage and power in hot climates are monocrystalline PV and its base PVT. Among the PVs, the lowest values were observed in front and black back coating photoelectric battery. Among the PVTs, it was observed in the polycrystalline silicon photothermal battery. When all types of PVTs were cooled by passing water with a temperature of 18-20°C, sharp electrical changes were observed in monocrystalline silicon with a black back coating. The conclusion from the results of this change is that the use of black back coating photoelectric battery in cold climate regions leads to higher efficiency. Compared to conventional PV, PVT has been observed to generate 1.3-1.4 times more electricity depending on the type of material.</abstract><cop>Bristol</cop><pub>IOP Publishing</pub><doi>10.1088/1742-6596/2388/1/012128</doi><tpages>9</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1742-6588
ispartof Journal of physics. Conference series, 2022-12, Vol.2388 (1), p.12128
issn 1742-6588
1742-6596
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_2753731638
source Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals; Institute of Physics Open Access Journal Titles; IOPscience extra; Alma/SFX Local Collection; Free Full-Text Journals in Chemistry
subjects Circuits
Climate
Coating
Hot climates
Open circuit voltage
Parameters
Photoelectricity
Photovoltaic cells
Physics
Polysilicon
Portable equipment
Radiation
Short circuit currents
Silicon
Solar radiation
title Testing of crystalline silicon-based photoelectric and photothermal batteries in real climate conditions and comparison of parameter changes
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-02T01%3A36%3A25IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_iop_j&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Testing%20of%20crystalline%20silicon-based%20photoelectric%20and%20photothermal%20batteries%20in%20real%20climate%20conditions%20and%20comparison%20of%20parameter%20changes&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20physics.%20Conference%20series&rft.au=Muminov,%20R%20A&rft.date=2022-12-01&rft.volume=2388&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=12128&rft.pages=12128-&rft.issn=1742-6588&rft.eissn=1742-6596&rft_id=info:doi/10.1088/1742-6596/2388/1/012128&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_iop_j%3E2753731638%3C/proquest_iop_j%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2753731638&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true