Effects of resource availability on carbon allocation and developmental instability in cloned birch seedlings

Abundant nitrogen improves seedling growth and establishment. Vigorous growth brings about changes in rates and patterns of plant development and changes in the relationship between primary and secondary metabolism, which may make seedlings more susceptible to herbivores and pathogens than are slow‐...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:International journal of plant sciences 2000-01, Vol.161 (1), p.119-125
Hauptverfasser: Lappalainen, J.H, Martel, J, Lempa, K, Wilsey, B, Ossipov, V
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Abundant nitrogen improves seedling growth and establishment. Vigorous growth brings about changes in rates and patterns of plant development and changes in the relationship between primary and secondary metabolism, which may make seedlings more susceptible to herbivores and pathogens than are slow‐growing seedlings. We studied how nitrogen fertilization and manual defoliation of source leaves affect growth, carbon allocation, and developmental instability in cloned seedlings of white birch (Betula pubescensEhrh.). Biomass was higher, whereas concentrations of most classes of phenolic compounds were lower in the nitrogen‐rich environment. Interestingly, fertilization did not change the concentrations of cell wall–bound proanthocyanidins, which represent an important fraction of the group of phenolic compounds. Nitrogen enrichment increased levels of fluctuating asymmetry, an index of developmental instability. This result confirms that not only stress but also any deviation from normal resource availability may increase leaf developmental instability in birches. In contrast to fertilization, a one‐time defoliation of source leaves did not shape seedling growth, development, or carbon allocation. This could be the result of compensatory growth or of the fact that the defoliation treatment was not strong enough to induce detectable effects until the end of the growing season.
ISSN:1058-5893
1537-5315
DOI:10.1086/314228