Individual justices and the solicitor general: The amicus curiae cases, 1953-2000
Deen et al examine trends in individual voting decisions on cases where the solicitor general submitted an amicus curiae brief clearly indicating policy preferences to the Court. Findings reveal that, in general, justices accord the solicitor general's office with a substantial amount of suppor...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Judicature 2005-09, Vol.89 (2), p.68 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | Deen et al examine trends in individual voting decisions on cases where the solicitor general submitted an amicus curiae brief clearly indicating policy preferences to the Court. Findings reveal that, in general, justices accord the solicitor general's office with a substantial amount of support - the office is supported by every justice from 1953 to 2000 a majority of the time. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 0022-5800 |