Healing dialogue: Can the techniques and practices of Track Two diplomacy play a role in resolving public health conflicts?
Track Two Diplomacy, a form of facilitated informal and unofficial dialogues between conflicting parties, has become a well-established form of international conflict resolution. This paper seeks to explore whether the techniques and practices of Track Two could be applied in a new setting beyond in...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | International journal (Toronto) 2022-06, Vol.77 (2), p.313-334 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 334 |
---|---|
container_issue | 2 |
container_start_page | 313 |
container_title | International journal (Toronto) |
container_volume | 77 |
creator | Bharwani, Aleem Palmiano Federer, Julia Latour, Jack |
description | Track Two Diplomacy, a form of facilitated informal and unofficial dialogues between conflicting parties, has become a well-established form of international conflict resolution. This paper seeks to explore whether the techniques and practices of Track Two could be applied in a new setting beyond international armed conflicts: public health. Global society continues to grapple with the devastating effects of the COVID-19 pandemic, systemic racism, and climate change, among other pressing public health issues that can not only exacerbate but also create new conflicts that negatively affect communities. Innovative and interdisciplinary approaches are needed more than ever. We synthesize literature from both Track Two and public health fields to present a conceptual framework that posits whether and how such concepts as the “problem-solving workshop,” “transfer,” “reflective practice” and others might support parties involved in divisive, intractable, visible, and invisible conflicts which currently mark the public health space. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1177/00207020221135364 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2739695305</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sage_id>10.1177_00207020221135364</sage_id><sourcerecordid>2739695305</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c242t-70ab8cd35abd89334d7a431eed7407cc097e32aecdd054b5c02ba2ac5ab0d8e53</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1UEtLw0AQXkTBWv0B3hY8p-4zabyIFLVCwUsFb2Gyu2lSt9m4myjFP--GCh7EwzB8zPeYGYQuKZlRmmXXhDCSxWKMUi55Ko7QhBHJEpHK12M0GefJSDhFZyFsScRCpBP0tTRgm3aDdQPWbQZzgxfQ4r42uDeqbpv3wQQMrcadB9U3KiJX4XUEb3j96aKus24Hao87C3sM2DtrcNNib4KzH6N1N5S2UbiOSX2NlWurCPtwe45OKrDBXPz0KXp5uF8vlsnq-fFpcbdKFBOsj1tDOVeaSyj1POdc6AwEp8boTJBMKZJnhjMwSmsiRSkVYSUwUJFP9NxIPkVXB9_Ou_Gcvti6wbcxsmAZz9NccjKy6IGlvAvBm6rofLMDvy8oKcYfF39-HDWzgybAxvy6_i_4Bvm3fR0</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2739695305</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Healing dialogue: Can the techniques and practices of Track Two diplomacy play a role in resolving public health conflicts?</title><source>Access via SAGE</source><source>Worldwide Political Science Abstracts</source><source>HeinOnline Law Journal Library</source><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><creator>Bharwani, Aleem ; Palmiano Federer, Julia ; Latour, Jack</creator><creatorcontrib>Bharwani, Aleem ; Palmiano Federer, Julia ; Latour, Jack</creatorcontrib><description>Track Two Diplomacy, a form of facilitated informal and unofficial dialogues between conflicting parties, has become a well-established form of international conflict resolution. This paper seeks to explore whether the techniques and practices of Track Two could be applied in a new setting beyond international armed conflicts: public health. Global society continues to grapple with the devastating effects of the COVID-19 pandemic, systemic racism, and climate change, among other pressing public health issues that can not only exacerbate but also create new conflicts that negatively affect communities. Innovative and interdisciplinary approaches are needed more than ever. We synthesize literature from both Track Two and public health fields to present a conceptual framework that posits whether and how such concepts as the “problem-solving workshop,” “transfer,” “reflective practice” and others might support parties involved in divisive, intractable, visible, and invisible conflicts which currently mark the public health space.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0020-7020</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2052-465X</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1177/00207020221135364</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>London, England: SAGE Publications</publisher><subject>Climate change ; Conflict resolution ; COVID-19 ; Diplomacy ; Discourse ; Healing ; Interdisciplinary aspects ; International conflict ; Pandemics ; Problem solving ; Public health ; Reflective practice ; Systemic racism</subject><ispartof>International journal (Toronto), 2022-06, Vol.77 (2), p.313-334</ispartof><rights>The Author(s) 2022</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c242t-70ab8cd35abd89334d7a431eed7407cc097e32aecdd054b5c02ba2ac5ab0d8e53</citedby><orcidid>0000-0002-5981-3589</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://journals.sagepub.com/doi/pdf/10.1177/00207020221135364$$EPDF$$P50$$Gsage$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/00207020221135364$$EHTML$$P50$$Gsage$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,21819,27924,27925,43621,43622</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Bharwani, Aleem</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Palmiano Federer, Julia</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Latour, Jack</creatorcontrib><title>Healing dialogue: Can the techniques and practices of Track Two diplomacy play a role in resolving public health conflicts?</title><title>International journal (Toronto)</title><description>Track Two Diplomacy, a form of facilitated informal and unofficial dialogues between conflicting parties, has become a well-established form of international conflict resolution. This paper seeks to explore whether the techniques and practices of Track Two could be applied in a new setting beyond international armed conflicts: public health. Global society continues to grapple with the devastating effects of the COVID-19 pandemic, systemic racism, and climate change, among other pressing public health issues that can not only exacerbate but also create new conflicts that negatively affect communities. Innovative and interdisciplinary approaches are needed more than ever. We synthesize literature from both Track Two and public health fields to present a conceptual framework that posits whether and how such concepts as the “problem-solving workshop,” “transfer,” “reflective practice” and others might support parties involved in divisive, intractable, visible, and invisible conflicts which currently mark the public health space.</description><subject>Climate change</subject><subject>Conflict resolution</subject><subject>COVID-19</subject><subject>Diplomacy</subject><subject>Discourse</subject><subject>Healing</subject><subject>Interdisciplinary aspects</subject><subject>International conflict</subject><subject>Pandemics</subject><subject>Problem solving</subject><subject>Public health</subject><subject>Reflective practice</subject><subject>Systemic racism</subject><issn>0020-7020</issn><issn>2052-465X</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2022</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>7UB</sourceid><recordid>eNp1UEtLw0AQXkTBWv0B3hY8p-4zabyIFLVCwUsFb2Gyu2lSt9m4myjFP--GCh7EwzB8zPeYGYQuKZlRmmXXhDCSxWKMUi55Ko7QhBHJEpHK12M0GefJSDhFZyFsScRCpBP0tTRgm3aDdQPWbQZzgxfQ4r42uDeqbpv3wQQMrcadB9U3KiJX4XUEb3j96aKus24Hao87C3sM2DtrcNNib4KzH6N1N5S2UbiOSX2NlWurCPtwe45OKrDBXPz0KXp5uF8vlsnq-fFpcbdKFBOsj1tDOVeaSyj1POdc6AwEp8boTJBMKZJnhjMwSmsiRSkVYSUwUJFP9NxIPkVXB9_Ou_Gcvti6wbcxsmAZz9NccjKy6IGlvAvBm6rofLMDvy8oKcYfF39-HDWzgybAxvy6_i_4Bvm3fR0</recordid><startdate>202206</startdate><enddate>202206</enddate><creator>Bharwani, Aleem</creator><creator>Palmiano Federer, Julia</creator><creator>Latour, Jack</creator><general>SAGE Publications</general><general>Sage Publications Ltd</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>4T-</scope><scope>7UB</scope><scope>8BJ</scope><scope>FQK</scope><scope>JBE</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5981-3589</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>202206</creationdate><title>Healing dialogue: Can the techniques and practices of Track Two diplomacy play a role in resolving public health conflicts?</title><author>Bharwani, Aleem ; Palmiano Federer, Julia ; Latour, Jack</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c242t-70ab8cd35abd89334d7a431eed7407cc097e32aecdd054b5c02ba2ac5ab0d8e53</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2022</creationdate><topic>Climate change</topic><topic>Conflict resolution</topic><topic>COVID-19</topic><topic>Diplomacy</topic><topic>Discourse</topic><topic>Healing</topic><topic>Interdisciplinary aspects</topic><topic>International conflict</topic><topic>Pandemics</topic><topic>Problem solving</topic><topic>Public health</topic><topic>Reflective practice</topic><topic>Systemic racism</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Bharwani, Aleem</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Palmiano Federer, Julia</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Latour, Jack</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Docstoc</collection><collection>Worldwide Political Science Abstracts</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><jtitle>International journal (Toronto)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Bharwani, Aleem</au><au>Palmiano Federer, Julia</au><au>Latour, Jack</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Healing dialogue: Can the techniques and practices of Track Two diplomacy play a role in resolving public health conflicts?</atitle><jtitle>International journal (Toronto)</jtitle><date>2022-06</date><risdate>2022</risdate><volume>77</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>313</spage><epage>334</epage><pages>313-334</pages><issn>0020-7020</issn><eissn>2052-465X</eissn><abstract>Track Two Diplomacy, a form of facilitated informal and unofficial dialogues between conflicting parties, has become a well-established form of international conflict resolution. This paper seeks to explore whether the techniques and practices of Track Two could be applied in a new setting beyond international armed conflicts: public health. Global society continues to grapple with the devastating effects of the COVID-19 pandemic, systemic racism, and climate change, among other pressing public health issues that can not only exacerbate but also create new conflicts that negatively affect communities. Innovative and interdisciplinary approaches are needed more than ever. We synthesize literature from both Track Two and public health fields to present a conceptual framework that posits whether and how such concepts as the “problem-solving workshop,” “transfer,” “reflective practice” and others might support parties involved in divisive, intractable, visible, and invisible conflicts which currently mark the public health space.</abstract><cop>London, England</cop><pub>SAGE Publications</pub><doi>10.1177/00207020221135364</doi><tpages>22</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5981-3589</orcidid></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0020-7020 |
ispartof | International journal (Toronto), 2022-06, Vol.77 (2), p.313-334 |
issn | 0020-7020 2052-465X |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_2739695305 |
source | Access via SAGE; Worldwide Political Science Abstracts; HeinOnline Law Journal Library; Alma/SFX Local Collection |
subjects | Climate change Conflict resolution COVID-19 Diplomacy Discourse Healing Interdisciplinary aspects International conflict Pandemics Problem solving Public health Reflective practice Systemic racism |
title | Healing dialogue: Can the techniques and practices of Track Two diplomacy play a role in resolving public health conflicts? |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-20T10%3A24%3A52IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Healing%20dialogue:%20Can%20the%20techniques%20and%20practices%20of%20Track%20Two%20diplomacy%20play%20a%20role%20in%20resolving%20public%20health%20conflicts?&rft.jtitle=International%20journal%20(Toronto)&rft.au=Bharwani,%20Aleem&rft.date=2022-06&rft.volume=77&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=313&rft.epage=334&rft.pages=313-334&rft.issn=0020-7020&rft.eissn=2052-465X&rft_id=info:doi/10.1177/00207020221135364&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2739695305%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2739695305&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_sage_id=10.1177_00207020221135364&rfr_iscdi=true |