Human germline genome editing and broad societal consensus

Should human genome editing be limited to somatic cells, or should germline genome editing also be permitted? Should (apparently) permissible human genome editing be limited to therapeutic purposes, or should enhancement purposes also be permitted? Who decides, and on what basis?

Gespeichert in:

Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:	Nature human behaviour 2017-06, Vol.1 (6), p.0103, Article 0103
1. Verfasser:	Baylis, Françoise
Format:	Artikel
Sprache:	eng
Schlagworte:	631/477/2811 692/308/2056 692/700/3935 706/648/179 706/689/477/2811 Alzheimer's disease Behavioral Sciences Biomedical and Life Sciences comment CRISPR Economic summit conferences Editing Ethics Experimental Psychology Genetic engineering Genome editing Genomes Genomics Human Genome Project Life Sciences Microeconomics Mutation Neurosciences Personality and Social Psychology Science Scientists
Online-Zugang:	Volltext
Tags:	Tag hinzufügen Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!

Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:	Should human genome editing be limited to somatic cells, or should germline genome editing also be permitted? Should (apparently) permissible human genome editing be limited to therapeutic purposes, or should enhancement purposes also be permitted? Who decides, and on what basis?
ISSN:	2397-3374 2397-3374
DOI:	10.1038/s41562-017-0103