Surplus production models: a practical review of recent approaches

Increasing the knowledge of approaches to estimate the status of data-limited stocks is of crucial importance since the vast majority of stocks are data-limited, i.e., there is not enough data to conduct a fully integrated statistical catch-at-age or at-length assessment. Among the different data-li...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Reviews in fish biology and fisheries 2022-12, Vol.32 (4), p.1085-1102
Hauptverfasser: Cousido-Rocha, Marta, Pennino, Maria Grazia, Izquierdo, Francisco, Paz, Anxo, Lojo, Davinia, Tifoura, Amina, Zanni, Mohamed Yosri, Cerviño, Santiago
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Increasing the knowledge of approaches to estimate the status of data-limited stocks is of crucial importance since the vast majority of stocks are data-limited, i.e., there is not enough data to conduct a fully integrated statistical catch-at-age or at-length assessment. Among the different data-limited methods, surplus production models (SPMs) are usually considered the most complete data-limited assessment methods since they are the only method that provides a full stock assessment. Due to high interest in the application of SPMs for assessing data-limited stocks, our contribution focuses on providing a practical review of these models and their corresponding characteristics. Additionally, we review the use of the surplus production concept in the “known biomass production models”, highlighting their potential through examples of relevant applications. After a general introduction to the formulation of SPMs, their framework and features, this review focuses on the SPMs most frequently applied by well-known marine research organisations: ASPIC (a stock-production model incorporating covariates), SPiCT (surplus-production model in continuous time) and JABBA (just another Bayesian biomass assessment). For each model, we provide details of its formulation and main features, in addition to evaluating the quality and characteristics of the available software. Based on this information, our comparative study highlights the advantages and disadvantages of each of the three SPMs. The conclusion provides recommendations for their use in the assessment of data-limited stocks, facilitating a decision about whether SPMs constitute an appropriate tool for guidance on and assessment of specific stocks. Finally, we evaluate which of the SPMs considered in this paper should be applied.
ISSN:0960-3166
1573-5184
DOI:10.1007/s11160-022-09731-w