Genetic diversity study in lentil (Lens culinaris Medik.) Germplasm: a comparison of CAAT Box Derived Polymorphism (CBDP) and simple sequence repeat (SSR) markers
To evaluate the genetic variability of 90 lentil genotypes, two different molecular marker techniques namely CAAT Box Derived Polymorphism (CBDP) and Simple Sequence Repeat (SSR) markers were utilized. Average polymorphism information content (PIC) for SSR and CBDP markers were 0.63 and 0.45, respec...
Gespeichert in:
| Veröffentlicht in: | Biológia 2022-10, Vol.77 (10), p.2793-2803 |
|---|---|
| Hauptverfasser: | , , |
| Format: | Artikel |
| Sprache: | eng |
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
| Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
| container_end_page | 2803 |
|---|---|
| container_issue | 10 |
| container_start_page | 2793 |
| container_title | Biológia |
| container_volume | 77 |
| creator | Saidi, Abbas Sarvmeili, Javad Pouresmael, Massoumeh |
| description | To evaluate the genetic variability of 90 lentil genotypes, two different molecular marker techniques namely CAAT Box Derived Polymorphism (CBDP) and Simple Sequence Repeat (SSR) markers were utilized. Average polymorphism information content (PIC) for SSR and CBDP markers were 0.63 and 0.45, respectively. The average genetic distance for CBDP and SSR markers were 0.50 and 0.49, respectively. Among markers tested, the average observed number of alleles (Na) for SSR markers were 4.83 and the average expected heterozygosity (He) for SSR marker was 0.64. The average of effective number of alleles (Ne) for SSR markers 3.01. The average resolving power (Rp) values ranged between 1.51 and 8.67 for SSR and CBDP markers, respectively. Overall, SSR80 showed maximum genetic diversity among the SSRs used. A total of 145 and 135 polymorphic bands were obtained using SSR and CBDP markers, respectively. CBDP and SSR markers showed different efficiency for evaluating DNA polymorphism in lentil. A positive significant correlation (r = 0.89
**
) for similarity matrix was obtained between CBDP and SSR markers. Neighbor-joining cluster analysis for both markers (CBDP and SSR markers) grouped the genotypes into five distinct clusters. Our results suggested high efficacy for SSR and CBDP markers in fingerprinting of lentil genotypes. This is the first report of using CBDP for genetic diversity analysis in lentil and also a comparison between CBDP and SSR markers among lentil germplasm. Generally, our results are able to show the suitability of CBDP and SSR markers for genetic diversity analysis in lentil for their high rates of polymorphism and their potential for genome diversity and germplasm conservation. |
| doi_str_mv | 10.1007/s11756-022-01089-5 |
| format | Article |
| fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2731212757</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2731212757</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c249t-b9dcb2672fab852ec6eaf7ea30723c1ad9b6b12099b913396ea77e2511dd45513</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9UctO3DAUjVAr8Sg_0NWV2MwsQm1nHGN2w0CnlaYC8Vhbjn0DhsQOdgZ1fqdfWtNBglVX90rncY_uKYqvlBxTQsS3RKngdUkYKwklJ7LkO8Ueraq6lLyuPn3Yd4v9lB4JmQlO6F7xZ4keR2fAuheMyY0bSOPabsB56NCProPJCn0Cs-6c19El-IXWPR1PYYmxHzqd-lPQYEI_vKLBQ2hhMZ_fwln4DecYs6-Fq9Bt-hCHB5d6mCzOzq-moL2F5LIFQsLnNXqDEHFAPcLk5uZ6Cr2OTznTl-Jzq7uEh2_zoLj7fnG7-FGuLpc_F_NVadhMjmUjrWlYLVirmxPO0NSoW4G6IoJVhmorm7qhjEjZyPwNmWEhkHFKrZ1xTquD4mjrO8SQ46RRPYZ19PmkYqKijDLBRWaxLcvEkFLEVg3R5aQbRYl67UJtu1C5C_WvC8WzqNqKUib7e4zv1v9R_QU-Bozd</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2731212757</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Genetic diversity study in lentil (Lens culinaris Medik.) Germplasm: a comparison of CAAT Box Derived Polymorphism (CBDP) and simple sequence repeat (SSR) markers</title><source>SpringerLink Journals</source><creator>Saidi, Abbas ; Sarvmeili, Javad ; Pouresmael, Massoumeh</creator><creatorcontrib>Saidi, Abbas ; Sarvmeili, Javad ; Pouresmael, Massoumeh</creatorcontrib><description>To evaluate the genetic variability of 90 lentil genotypes, two different molecular marker techniques namely CAAT Box Derived Polymorphism (CBDP) and Simple Sequence Repeat (SSR) markers were utilized. Average polymorphism information content (PIC) for SSR and CBDP markers were 0.63 and 0.45, respectively. The average genetic distance for CBDP and SSR markers were 0.50 and 0.49, respectively. Among markers tested, the average observed number of alleles (Na) for SSR markers were 4.83 and the average expected heterozygosity (He) for SSR marker was 0.64. The average of effective number of alleles (Ne) for SSR markers 3.01. The average resolving power (Rp) values ranged between 1.51 and 8.67 for SSR and CBDP markers, respectively. Overall, SSR80 showed maximum genetic diversity among the SSRs used. A total of 145 and 135 polymorphic bands were obtained using SSR and CBDP markers, respectively. CBDP and SSR markers showed different efficiency for evaluating DNA polymorphism in lentil. A positive significant correlation (r = 0.89
**
) for similarity matrix was obtained between CBDP and SSR markers. Neighbor-joining cluster analysis for both markers (CBDP and SSR markers) grouped the genotypes into five distinct clusters. Our results suggested high efficacy for SSR and CBDP markers in fingerprinting of lentil genotypes. This is the first report of using CBDP for genetic diversity analysis in lentil and also a comparison between CBDP and SSR markers among lentil germplasm. Generally, our results are able to show the suitability of CBDP and SSR markers for genetic diversity analysis in lentil for their high rates of polymorphism and their potential for genome diversity and germplasm conservation.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1336-9563</identifier><identifier>ISSN: 0006-3088</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1336-9563</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s11756-022-01089-5</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Cham: Springer International Publishing</publisher><subject>Alleles ; Biomedical and Life Sciences ; Cell Biology ; Cluster analysis ; Fingerprinting ; Gene polymorphism ; Genetic analysis ; Genetic distance ; Genetic diversity ; Genetic variability ; Genomes ; Genotypes ; Germplasm ; Heterozygosity ; Information processing ; Legumes ; Life Sciences ; Markers ; Microbiology ; Original Article ; Plant Sciences ; Polymorphism ; Resolution ; Zoology</subject><ispartof>Biológia, 2022-10, Vol.77 (10), p.2793-2803</ispartof><rights>The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Plant Science and Biodiversity Centre, Slovak Academy of Sciences (SAS), Institute of Zoology, Slovak Academy of Sciences (SAS), Institute of Molecular Biology, Slovak Academy of Sciences (SAS) 2022</rights><rights>The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Plant Science and Biodiversity Centre, Slovak Academy of Sciences (SAS), Institute of Zoology, Slovak Academy of Sciences (SAS), Institute of Molecular Biology, Slovak Academy of Sciences (SAS) 2022.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c249t-b9dcb2672fab852ec6eaf7ea30723c1ad9b6b12099b913396ea77e2511dd45513</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c249t-b9dcb2672fab852ec6eaf7ea30723c1ad9b6b12099b913396ea77e2511dd45513</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s11756-022-01089-5$$EPDF$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/10.1007/s11756-022-01089-5$$EHTML$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27901,27902,41464,42533,51294</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Saidi, Abbas</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sarvmeili, Javad</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pouresmael, Massoumeh</creatorcontrib><title>Genetic diversity study in lentil (Lens culinaris Medik.) Germplasm: a comparison of CAAT Box Derived Polymorphism (CBDP) and simple sequence repeat (SSR) markers</title><title>Biológia</title><addtitle>Biologia</addtitle><description>To evaluate the genetic variability of 90 lentil genotypes, two different molecular marker techniques namely CAAT Box Derived Polymorphism (CBDP) and Simple Sequence Repeat (SSR) markers were utilized. Average polymorphism information content (PIC) for SSR and CBDP markers were 0.63 and 0.45, respectively. The average genetic distance for CBDP and SSR markers were 0.50 and 0.49, respectively. Among markers tested, the average observed number of alleles (Na) for SSR markers were 4.83 and the average expected heterozygosity (He) for SSR marker was 0.64. The average of effective number of alleles (Ne) for SSR markers 3.01. The average resolving power (Rp) values ranged between 1.51 and 8.67 for SSR and CBDP markers, respectively. Overall, SSR80 showed maximum genetic diversity among the SSRs used. A total of 145 and 135 polymorphic bands were obtained using SSR and CBDP markers, respectively. CBDP and SSR markers showed different efficiency for evaluating DNA polymorphism in lentil. A positive significant correlation (r = 0.89
**
) for similarity matrix was obtained between CBDP and SSR markers. Neighbor-joining cluster analysis for both markers (CBDP and SSR markers) grouped the genotypes into five distinct clusters. Our results suggested high efficacy for SSR and CBDP markers in fingerprinting of lentil genotypes. This is the first report of using CBDP for genetic diversity analysis in lentil and also a comparison between CBDP and SSR markers among lentil germplasm. Generally, our results are able to show the suitability of CBDP and SSR markers for genetic diversity analysis in lentil for their high rates of polymorphism and their potential for genome diversity and germplasm conservation.</description><subject>Alleles</subject><subject>Biomedical and Life Sciences</subject><subject>Cell Biology</subject><subject>Cluster analysis</subject><subject>Fingerprinting</subject><subject>Gene polymorphism</subject><subject>Genetic analysis</subject><subject>Genetic distance</subject><subject>Genetic diversity</subject><subject>Genetic variability</subject><subject>Genomes</subject><subject>Genotypes</subject><subject>Germplasm</subject><subject>Heterozygosity</subject><subject>Information processing</subject><subject>Legumes</subject><subject>Life Sciences</subject><subject>Markers</subject><subject>Microbiology</subject><subject>Original Article</subject><subject>Plant Sciences</subject><subject>Polymorphism</subject><subject>Resolution</subject><subject>Zoology</subject><issn>1336-9563</issn><issn>0006-3088</issn><issn>1336-9563</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2022</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp9UctO3DAUjVAr8Sg_0NWV2MwsQm1nHGN2w0CnlaYC8Vhbjn0DhsQOdgZ1fqdfWtNBglVX90rncY_uKYqvlBxTQsS3RKngdUkYKwklJ7LkO8Ueraq6lLyuPn3Yd4v9lB4JmQlO6F7xZ4keR2fAuheMyY0bSOPabsB56NCProPJCn0Cs-6c19El-IXWPR1PYYmxHzqd-lPQYEI_vKLBQ2hhMZ_fwln4DecYs6-Fq9Bt-hCHB5d6mCzOzq-moL2F5LIFQsLnNXqDEHFAPcLk5uZ6Cr2OTznTl-Jzq7uEh2_zoLj7fnG7-FGuLpc_F_NVadhMjmUjrWlYLVirmxPO0NSoW4G6IoJVhmorm7qhjEjZyPwNmWEhkHFKrZ1xTquD4mjrO8SQ46RRPYZ19PmkYqKijDLBRWaxLcvEkFLEVg3R5aQbRYl67UJtu1C5C_WvC8WzqNqKUib7e4zv1v9R_QU-Bozd</recordid><startdate>20221001</startdate><enddate>20221001</enddate><creator>Saidi, Abbas</creator><creator>Sarvmeili, Javad</creator><creator>Pouresmael, Massoumeh</creator><general>Springer International Publishing</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QG</scope><scope>7QL</scope><scope>7QP</scope><scope>7QR</scope><scope>7SN</scope><scope>7SS</scope><scope>7T5</scope><scope>7T7</scope><scope>7TK</scope><scope>7TM</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>H94</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>M7N</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>RC3</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20221001</creationdate><title>Genetic diversity study in lentil (Lens culinaris Medik.) Germplasm: a comparison of CAAT Box Derived Polymorphism (CBDP) and simple sequence repeat (SSR) markers</title><author>Saidi, Abbas ; Sarvmeili, Javad ; Pouresmael, Massoumeh</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c249t-b9dcb2672fab852ec6eaf7ea30723c1ad9b6b12099b913396ea77e2511dd45513</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2022</creationdate><topic>Alleles</topic><topic>Biomedical and Life Sciences</topic><topic>Cell Biology</topic><topic>Cluster analysis</topic><topic>Fingerprinting</topic><topic>Gene polymorphism</topic><topic>Genetic analysis</topic><topic>Genetic distance</topic><topic>Genetic diversity</topic><topic>Genetic variability</topic><topic>Genomes</topic><topic>Genotypes</topic><topic>Germplasm</topic><topic>Heterozygosity</topic><topic>Information processing</topic><topic>Legumes</topic><topic>Life Sciences</topic><topic>Markers</topic><topic>Microbiology</topic><topic>Original Article</topic><topic>Plant Sciences</topic><topic>Polymorphism</topic><topic>Resolution</topic><topic>Zoology</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Saidi, Abbas</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sarvmeili, Javad</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pouresmael, Massoumeh</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Animal Behavior Abstracts</collection><collection>Bacteriology Abstracts (Microbiology B)</collection><collection>Calcium & Calcified Tissue Abstracts</collection><collection>Chemoreception Abstracts</collection><collection>Ecology Abstracts</collection><collection>Entomology Abstracts (Full archive)</collection><collection>Immunology Abstracts</collection><collection>Industrial and Applied Microbiology Abstracts (Microbiology A)</collection><collection>Neurosciences Abstracts</collection><collection>Nucleic Acids Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>AIDS and Cancer Research Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Algology Mycology and Protozoology Abstracts (Microbiology C)</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Genetics Abstracts</collection><jtitle>Biológia</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Saidi, Abbas</au><au>Sarvmeili, Javad</au><au>Pouresmael, Massoumeh</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Genetic diversity study in lentil (Lens culinaris Medik.) Germplasm: a comparison of CAAT Box Derived Polymorphism (CBDP) and simple sequence repeat (SSR) markers</atitle><jtitle>Biológia</jtitle><stitle>Biologia</stitle><date>2022-10-01</date><risdate>2022</risdate><volume>77</volume><issue>10</issue><spage>2793</spage><epage>2803</epage><pages>2793-2803</pages><issn>1336-9563</issn><issn>0006-3088</issn><eissn>1336-9563</eissn><abstract>To evaluate the genetic variability of 90 lentil genotypes, two different molecular marker techniques namely CAAT Box Derived Polymorphism (CBDP) and Simple Sequence Repeat (SSR) markers were utilized. Average polymorphism information content (PIC) for SSR and CBDP markers were 0.63 and 0.45, respectively. The average genetic distance for CBDP and SSR markers were 0.50 and 0.49, respectively. Among markers tested, the average observed number of alleles (Na) for SSR markers were 4.83 and the average expected heterozygosity (He) for SSR marker was 0.64. The average of effective number of alleles (Ne) for SSR markers 3.01. The average resolving power (Rp) values ranged between 1.51 and 8.67 for SSR and CBDP markers, respectively. Overall, SSR80 showed maximum genetic diversity among the SSRs used. A total of 145 and 135 polymorphic bands were obtained using SSR and CBDP markers, respectively. CBDP and SSR markers showed different efficiency for evaluating DNA polymorphism in lentil. A positive significant correlation (r = 0.89
**
) for similarity matrix was obtained between CBDP and SSR markers. Neighbor-joining cluster analysis for both markers (CBDP and SSR markers) grouped the genotypes into five distinct clusters. Our results suggested high efficacy for SSR and CBDP markers in fingerprinting of lentil genotypes. This is the first report of using CBDP for genetic diversity analysis in lentil and also a comparison between CBDP and SSR markers among lentil germplasm. Generally, our results are able to show the suitability of CBDP and SSR markers for genetic diversity analysis in lentil for their high rates of polymorphism and their potential for genome diversity and germplasm conservation.</abstract><cop>Cham</cop><pub>Springer International Publishing</pub><doi>10.1007/s11756-022-01089-5</doi><tpages>11</tpages></addata></record> |
| fulltext | fulltext |
| identifier | ISSN: 1336-9563 |
| ispartof | Biológia, 2022-10, Vol.77 (10), p.2793-2803 |
| issn | 1336-9563 0006-3088 1336-9563 |
| language | eng |
| recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_2731212757 |
| source | SpringerLink Journals |
| subjects | Alleles Biomedical and Life Sciences Cell Biology Cluster analysis Fingerprinting Gene polymorphism Genetic analysis Genetic distance Genetic diversity Genetic variability Genomes Genotypes Germplasm Heterozygosity Information processing Legumes Life Sciences Markers Microbiology Original Article Plant Sciences Polymorphism Resolution Zoology |
| title | Genetic diversity study in lentil (Lens culinaris Medik.) Germplasm: a comparison of CAAT Box Derived Polymorphism (CBDP) and simple sequence repeat (SSR) markers |
| url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-09T07%3A34%3A02IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Genetic%20diversity%20study%20in%20lentil%20(Lens%20culinaris%20Medik.)%20Germplasm:%20a%20comparison%20of%20CAAT%20Box%20Derived%20Polymorphism%20(CBDP)%20and%20simple%20sequence%20repeat%20(SSR)%20markers&rft.jtitle=Biolo%CC%81gia&rft.au=Saidi,%20Abbas&rft.date=2022-10-01&rft.volume=77&rft.issue=10&rft.spage=2793&rft.epage=2803&rft.pages=2793-2803&rft.issn=1336-9563&rft.eissn=1336-9563&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s11756-022-01089-5&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2731212757%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2731212757&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |