Understanding the relationship between sexual assault and cervical screening uptake": Correction to Madden et al., 2022

Reports an error in "Understanding the relationship between sexual assault and cervical screening uptake" by Katherine Madden, Jane Vosper, Michael Evangeli and Stuart Gibson ( European Journal of Health Psychology, Advanced Online Publication, Feb 21, 2022, np). In the article, there is a...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:European journal of health psychology 2022-01, Vol.29 (4), p.207-207
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Reports an error in "Understanding the relationship between sexual assault and cervical screening uptake" by Katherine Madden, Jane Vosper, Michael Evangeli and Stuart Gibson ( European Journal of Health Psychology, Advanced Online Publication, Feb 21, 2022, np). In the article, there is a mistake in Fig. 2 (p. 200). The correct figure is provided in the erratum. (The following abstract of the original article appeared in record 2022-37089-001.) Background: Cervical screening helps prevent cervical cancer (NHS, 2019). Women who have experienced sexual assault have lower cervical screening attendance, however, no theory-driven research explores reasons for this. The Health Action Process Approach (HAPA) explains intention and ongoing attendance to health-promoting behaviors. Aims: The HAPA was used to identify and explore how sexual assault impacts cervical screening uptake. Method: An online study of 247 women aged 21–63 explored whether HAPA variables (task, maintenance, and recovery self-efficacy, outcome expectancies, risk perception, action, and coping planning), trauma variables (nature and age of abuse, and level of post-traumatic stress disorder symptoms [PTSD]), and other potentially confounding factors related to cervical screening uptake in women who have experienced sexual assault. Regression and mediation analyses were conducted to explore predictive variables of intention and attendance. Results: Self-efficacy beliefs predicted both intention and attendance of cervical screening. Task self-efficacy predicted intention and mediated relationships between HAPA variables and intention. Maintenance self-efficacy predicted attendance and mediated relationships between HAPA variables and attendance. Trauma variables did not predict more variance in intention or attendance over HAPA variables. Limitations: The cross-sectional nature of the study means causality was not established. Conclusion: Self-efficacy develops an understanding of cervical screening in women with experience of sexual assault, over and above the trauma variables of type of assault and PTSD symptoms. Focusing on self-efficacy to improve cervical screening uptake in women who have experienced sexual assault is considered for clinical implications. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2022 APA, all rights reserved) (Source: journal abstract)
ISSN:2512-8442
2512-8450
DOI:10.1027/2512-8442/a000124