Using CMIP6 Models to Assess the Significance of the Observed Trend in the Atlantic Meridional Overturning Circulation

Observations from the RAPID array at 26.5°N suggest a weakening in the Atlantic meridional overturning circulation between 2004 and 2020. The shortness of this time series raises the question of whether this weakening should be thought of as natural variability or as related to climate change. To estimate natural variability, preindustrial control runs of the Coupled Model Intercomparison Project Phase 6 are used and the observed weakening is found to fall within the distribution of naturally occurring trends. These trends result from model variability on periods longer than the observational window, and variation between models at these frequencies is especially pronounced. Finally, adding noise to inflate model variability also inflates model trends; however, the effect on trends is sensitive only to the low frequency portion of the noise spectrum. Plain Language Summary The Atlantic meridional overturning circulation (AMOC) is a major ocean circulation system that transports heat northward in the Atlantic basin thus contributing to the regulation of the climate system. Fluctuations in the AMOC have been linked with changes in Arctic sea ice and to variations in the climate of Europe and North America. The longest direct observational record of the AMOC spans only 15.8 years and has shown a weakening of the circulation. Whether this weakening is due to natural oscillations in the climate system or is a response to anthropogenic greenhouse gases in the atmosphere is unclear. To assess whether the ocean circulation produces spontaneously weakening signals of such intensity, long simulations of climate models run under a preindustrial scenario are used to estimate the natural variability of the AMOC. These models suggest that the current weakening of the AMOC is consistent with natural variability. An accurate representation of slow timescale fluctuations in the AMOC is what matters most to the detection of an anthropogenically driven AMOC trend. This variability, however, differs markedly across models. Key Points The 2004–2020 observed Atlantic meridional overturning circulation (AMOC) trend is not significantly relative to Coupled Model Intercomparison Project Phase 6 (CMIP6) model natural variability CMIP6 models largely disagree on AMOC variability, including at decadal and longer periods It is periods longer than the observational window that set AMOC trend detectability thresholds