Which predictor is more predictive for Bitcoin volatility? And why?

Being more and more popular in the past 10 years, Bitcoin has drawn extensive attention from the press, scholars, and practitioners. The aim of this paper is to investigate which predictor is more predictive for Bitcoin volatility from the aspects of in‐sample and out‐of‐sample in a high‐speed chang...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:International journal of finance and economics 2022-04, Vol.27 (2), p.1947-1961
Hauptverfasser: Liang, Chao, Zhang, Yaojie, Li, Xiafei, Ma, Feng
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Being more and more popular in the past 10 years, Bitcoin has drawn extensive attention from the press, scholars, and practitioners. The aim of this paper is to investigate which predictor is more predictive for Bitcoin volatility from the aspects of in‐sample and out‐of‐sample in a high‐speed changing world. We utilise the GARCH‐MIDAS model to examine the predictive power of five crucial predictors, including VIX, GVZ, Google Trends, GEPU, and GPR. Our findings provide strong evidence that GVZ exhibits strongest predictability for Bitcoin volatility over other competing predictors. Other empirical results based on different out‐of‐sample forecasting periods, alternative loss functions and combination methods further ensure our major conclusions are robust.
ISSN:1076-9307
1099-1158
DOI:10.1002/ijfe.2252