What about broader impacts for child language acquisition research? A commentary on Kidd and Garcia (2022)

Kidd and Garcia cogently articulate scientific problems related to intellectual merit that are associated with the lack of language diversity in L1 acquisition research. However, science must also consider stakes related to the broader impacts of research. Focusing on Indigenous language communities...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:First language 2022-12, Vol.42 (6), p.774-778
1. Verfasser: Henke, Ryan E.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 778
container_issue 6
container_start_page 774
container_title First language
container_volume 42
creator Henke, Ryan E.
description Kidd and Garcia cogently articulate scientific problems related to intellectual merit that are associated with the lack of language diversity in L1 acquisition research. However, science must also consider stakes related to the broader impacts of research. Focusing on Indigenous language communities in North America, I discuss ways that the lack of language coverage causes linguistic science to fall short in making broader impacts in areas such as speech-language pathology and language revitalization programs.
doi_str_mv 10.1177/01427237221081731
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2725966879</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sage_id>10.1177_01427237221081731</sage_id><sourcerecordid>2725966879</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c312t-4c9346e8867c1c7d49d7b246396b5071df0c63e3f3ec4690dfce227aa82ba5393</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kE1LwzAYx4MoOKcfwFvAix4687akPckYOsWBF8VjeZqkW8babEl68NvbUsGDeHoO_zeeH0LXlMwoVeqeUMEU44oxSnKqOD1BE6oEyRgX4hRNBj0bDOfoIsYdIYwXREzQ7nMLCUPlu4Sr4MHYgF1zAJ0irn3Aeuv2Bu-h3XSwsRj0sXPRJedbHGy0EPT2AS-w9k1j2wThC_fKqzMGQ2vwqtcd4FtGGLu7RGc17KO9-rlT9PH0-L58ztZvq5flYp1pTlnKhC64kDbPpdJUKyMKoyomJC9kNSeKmppoyS2vudVCFsTU2jKmAHJWwZwXfIpuxt5D8MfOxlTufBfafrLsEc0LKXM1uOjo0sHHGGxdHoJr-gdKSsoBafkHaZ-ZjZnYs_ht_T_wDWPWdGY</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2725966879</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>What about broader impacts for child language acquisition research? A commentary on Kidd and Garcia (2022)</title><source>SAGE Complete A-Z List</source><creator>Henke, Ryan E.</creator><creatorcontrib>Henke, Ryan E.</creatorcontrib><description>Kidd and Garcia cogently articulate scientific problems related to intellectual merit that are associated with the lack of language diversity in L1 acquisition research. However, science must also consider stakes related to the broader impacts of research. Focusing on Indigenous language communities in North America, I discuss ways that the lack of language coverage causes linguistic science to fall short in making broader impacts in areas such as speech-language pathology and language revitalization programs.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0142-7237</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1740-2344</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1177/01427237221081731</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>London, England: SAGE Publications</publisher><subject>Child language ; Indigenous languages ; Language diversity ; Language planning ; Language revitalization ; Native language acquisition ; Northern Amerind languages ; Speech-language pathology</subject><ispartof>First language, 2022-12, Vol.42 (6), p.774-778</ispartof><rights>The Author(s) 2022</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c312t-4c9346e8867c1c7d49d7b246396b5071df0c63e3f3ec4690dfce227aa82ba5393</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c312t-4c9346e8867c1c7d49d7b246396b5071df0c63e3f3ec4690dfce227aa82ba5393</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-0382-7500</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://journals.sagepub.com/doi/pdf/10.1177/01427237221081731$$EPDF$$P50$$Gsage$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/01427237221081731$$EHTML$$P50$$Gsage$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,777,781,21800,27905,27906,43602,43603</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Henke, Ryan E.</creatorcontrib><title>What about broader impacts for child language acquisition research? A commentary on Kidd and Garcia (2022)</title><title>First language</title><description>Kidd and Garcia cogently articulate scientific problems related to intellectual merit that are associated with the lack of language diversity in L1 acquisition research. However, science must also consider stakes related to the broader impacts of research. Focusing on Indigenous language communities in North America, I discuss ways that the lack of language coverage causes linguistic science to fall short in making broader impacts in areas such as speech-language pathology and language revitalization programs.</description><subject>Child language</subject><subject>Indigenous languages</subject><subject>Language diversity</subject><subject>Language planning</subject><subject>Language revitalization</subject><subject>Native language acquisition</subject><subject>Northern Amerind languages</subject><subject>Speech-language pathology</subject><issn>0142-7237</issn><issn>1740-2344</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2022</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp1kE1LwzAYx4MoOKcfwFvAix4687akPckYOsWBF8VjeZqkW8babEl68NvbUsGDeHoO_zeeH0LXlMwoVeqeUMEU44oxSnKqOD1BE6oEyRgX4hRNBj0bDOfoIsYdIYwXREzQ7nMLCUPlu4Sr4MHYgF1zAJ0irn3Aeuv2Bu-h3XSwsRj0sXPRJedbHGy0EPT2AS-w9k1j2wThC_fKqzMGQ2vwqtcd4FtGGLu7RGc17KO9-rlT9PH0-L58ztZvq5flYp1pTlnKhC64kDbPpdJUKyMKoyomJC9kNSeKmppoyS2vudVCFsTU2jKmAHJWwZwXfIpuxt5D8MfOxlTufBfafrLsEc0LKXM1uOjo0sHHGGxdHoJr-gdKSsoBafkHaZ-ZjZnYs_ht_T_wDWPWdGY</recordid><startdate>20221201</startdate><enddate>20221201</enddate><creator>Henke, Ryan E.</creator><general>SAGE Publications</general><general>Sage Publications Ltd</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7T9</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0382-7500</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20221201</creationdate><title>What about broader impacts for child language acquisition research? A commentary on Kidd and Garcia (2022)</title><author>Henke, Ryan E.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c312t-4c9346e8867c1c7d49d7b246396b5071df0c63e3f3ec4690dfce227aa82ba5393</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2022</creationdate><topic>Child language</topic><topic>Indigenous languages</topic><topic>Language diversity</topic><topic>Language planning</topic><topic>Language revitalization</topic><topic>Native language acquisition</topic><topic>Northern Amerind languages</topic><topic>Speech-language pathology</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Henke, Ryan E.</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Linguistics and Language Behavior Abstracts (LLBA)</collection><jtitle>First language</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Henke, Ryan E.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>What about broader impacts for child language acquisition research? A commentary on Kidd and Garcia (2022)</atitle><jtitle>First language</jtitle><date>2022-12-01</date><risdate>2022</risdate><volume>42</volume><issue>6</issue><spage>774</spage><epage>778</epage><pages>774-778</pages><issn>0142-7237</issn><eissn>1740-2344</eissn><abstract>Kidd and Garcia cogently articulate scientific problems related to intellectual merit that are associated with the lack of language diversity in L1 acquisition research. However, science must also consider stakes related to the broader impacts of research. Focusing on Indigenous language communities in North America, I discuss ways that the lack of language coverage causes linguistic science to fall short in making broader impacts in areas such as speech-language pathology and language revitalization programs.</abstract><cop>London, England</cop><pub>SAGE Publications</pub><doi>10.1177/01427237221081731</doi><tpages>5</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0382-7500</orcidid></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0142-7237
ispartof First language, 2022-12, Vol.42 (6), p.774-778
issn 0142-7237
1740-2344
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_2725966879
source SAGE Complete A-Z List
subjects Child language
Indigenous languages
Language diversity
Language planning
Language revitalization
Native language acquisition
Northern Amerind languages
Speech-language pathology
title What about broader impacts for child language acquisition research? A commentary on Kidd and Garcia (2022)
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-20T15%3A39%3A37IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=What%20about%20broader%20impacts%20for%20child%20language%20acquisition%20research?%20A%20commentary%20on%20Kidd%20and%20Garcia%20(2022)&rft.jtitle=First%20language&rft.au=Henke,%20Ryan%20E.&rft.date=2022-12-01&rft.volume=42&rft.issue=6&rft.spage=774&rft.epage=778&rft.pages=774-778&rft.issn=0142-7237&rft.eissn=1740-2344&rft_id=info:doi/10.1177/01427237221081731&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2725966879%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2725966879&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_sage_id=10.1177_01427237221081731&rfr_iscdi=true