What about broader impacts for child language acquisition research? A commentary on Kidd and Garcia (2022)
Kidd and Garcia cogently articulate scientific problems related to intellectual merit that are associated with the lack of language diversity in L1 acquisition research. However, science must also consider stakes related to the broader impacts of research. Focusing on Indigenous language communities...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | First language 2022-12, Vol.42 (6), p.774-778 |
---|---|
1. Verfasser: | |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 778 |
---|---|
container_issue | 6 |
container_start_page | 774 |
container_title | First language |
container_volume | 42 |
creator | Henke, Ryan E. |
description | Kidd and Garcia cogently articulate scientific problems related to intellectual merit that are associated with the lack of language diversity in L1 acquisition research. However, science must also consider stakes related to the broader impacts of research. Focusing on Indigenous language communities in North America, I discuss ways that the lack of language coverage causes linguistic science to fall short in making broader impacts in areas such as speech-language pathology and language revitalization programs. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1177/01427237221081731 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2725966879</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sage_id>10.1177_01427237221081731</sage_id><sourcerecordid>2725966879</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c312t-4c9346e8867c1c7d49d7b246396b5071df0c63e3f3ec4690dfce227aa82ba5393</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kE1LwzAYx4MoOKcfwFvAix4687akPckYOsWBF8VjeZqkW8babEl68NvbUsGDeHoO_zeeH0LXlMwoVeqeUMEU44oxSnKqOD1BE6oEyRgX4hRNBj0bDOfoIsYdIYwXREzQ7nMLCUPlu4Sr4MHYgF1zAJ0irn3Aeuv2Bu-h3XSwsRj0sXPRJedbHGy0EPT2AS-w9k1j2wThC_fKqzMGQ2vwqtcd4FtGGLu7RGc17KO9-rlT9PH0-L58ztZvq5flYp1pTlnKhC64kDbPpdJUKyMKoyomJC9kNSeKmppoyS2vudVCFsTU2jKmAHJWwZwXfIpuxt5D8MfOxlTufBfafrLsEc0LKXM1uOjo0sHHGGxdHoJr-gdKSsoBafkHaZ-ZjZnYs_ht_T_wDWPWdGY</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2725966879</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>What about broader impacts for child language acquisition research? A commentary on Kidd and Garcia (2022)</title><source>SAGE Complete A-Z List</source><creator>Henke, Ryan E.</creator><creatorcontrib>Henke, Ryan E.</creatorcontrib><description>Kidd and Garcia cogently articulate scientific problems related to intellectual merit that are associated with the lack of language diversity in L1 acquisition research. However, science must also consider stakes related to the broader impacts of research. Focusing on Indigenous language communities in North America, I discuss ways that the lack of language coverage causes linguistic science to fall short in making broader impacts in areas such as speech-language pathology and language revitalization programs.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0142-7237</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1740-2344</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1177/01427237221081731</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>London, England: SAGE Publications</publisher><subject>Child language ; Indigenous languages ; Language diversity ; Language planning ; Language revitalization ; Native language acquisition ; Northern Amerind languages ; Speech-language pathology</subject><ispartof>First language, 2022-12, Vol.42 (6), p.774-778</ispartof><rights>The Author(s) 2022</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c312t-4c9346e8867c1c7d49d7b246396b5071df0c63e3f3ec4690dfce227aa82ba5393</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c312t-4c9346e8867c1c7d49d7b246396b5071df0c63e3f3ec4690dfce227aa82ba5393</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-0382-7500</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://journals.sagepub.com/doi/pdf/10.1177/01427237221081731$$EPDF$$P50$$Gsage$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/01427237221081731$$EHTML$$P50$$Gsage$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,777,781,21800,27905,27906,43602,43603</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Henke, Ryan E.</creatorcontrib><title>What about broader impacts for child language acquisition research? A commentary on Kidd and Garcia (2022)</title><title>First language</title><description>Kidd and Garcia cogently articulate scientific problems related to intellectual merit that are associated with the lack of language diversity in L1 acquisition research. However, science must also consider stakes related to the broader impacts of research. Focusing on Indigenous language communities in North America, I discuss ways that the lack of language coverage causes linguistic science to fall short in making broader impacts in areas such as speech-language pathology and language revitalization programs.</description><subject>Child language</subject><subject>Indigenous languages</subject><subject>Language diversity</subject><subject>Language planning</subject><subject>Language revitalization</subject><subject>Native language acquisition</subject><subject>Northern Amerind languages</subject><subject>Speech-language pathology</subject><issn>0142-7237</issn><issn>1740-2344</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2022</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp1kE1LwzAYx4MoOKcfwFvAix4687akPckYOsWBF8VjeZqkW8babEl68NvbUsGDeHoO_zeeH0LXlMwoVeqeUMEU44oxSnKqOD1BE6oEyRgX4hRNBj0bDOfoIsYdIYwXREzQ7nMLCUPlu4Sr4MHYgF1zAJ0irn3Aeuv2Bu-h3XSwsRj0sXPRJedbHGy0EPT2AS-w9k1j2wThC_fKqzMGQ2vwqtcd4FtGGLu7RGc17KO9-rlT9PH0-L58ztZvq5flYp1pTlnKhC64kDbPpdJUKyMKoyomJC9kNSeKmppoyS2vudVCFsTU2jKmAHJWwZwXfIpuxt5D8MfOxlTufBfafrLsEc0LKXM1uOjo0sHHGGxdHoJr-gdKSsoBafkHaZ-ZjZnYs_ht_T_wDWPWdGY</recordid><startdate>20221201</startdate><enddate>20221201</enddate><creator>Henke, Ryan E.</creator><general>SAGE Publications</general><general>Sage Publications Ltd</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7T9</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0382-7500</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20221201</creationdate><title>What about broader impacts for child language acquisition research? A commentary on Kidd and Garcia (2022)</title><author>Henke, Ryan E.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c312t-4c9346e8867c1c7d49d7b246396b5071df0c63e3f3ec4690dfce227aa82ba5393</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2022</creationdate><topic>Child language</topic><topic>Indigenous languages</topic><topic>Language diversity</topic><topic>Language planning</topic><topic>Language revitalization</topic><topic>Native language acquisition</topic><topic>Northern Amerind languages</topic><topic>Speech-language pathology</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Henke, Ryan E.</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Linguistics and Language Behavior Abstracts (LLBA)</collection><jtitle>First language</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Henke, Ryan E.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>What about broader impacts for child language acquisition research? A commentary on Kidd and Garcia (2022)</atitle><jtitle>First language</jtitle><date>2022-12-01</date><risdate>2022</risdate><volume>42</volume><issue>6</issue><spage>774</spage><epage>778</epage><pages>774-778</pages><issn>0142-7237</issn><eissn>1740-2344</eissn><abstract>Kidd and Garcia cogently articulate scientific problems related to intellectual merit that are associated with the lack of language diversity in L1 acquisition research. However, science must also consider stakes related to the broader impacts of research. Focusing on Indigenous language communities in North America, I discuss ways that the lack of language coverage causes linguistic science to fall short in making broader impacts in areas such as speech-language pathology and language revitalization programs.</abstract><cop>London, England</cop><pub>SAGE Publications</pub><doi>10.1177/01427237221081731</doi><tpages>5</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0382-7500</orcidid></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0142-7237 |
ispartof | First language, 2022-12, Vol.42 (6), p.774-778 |
issn | 0142-7237 1740-2344 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_2725966879 |
source | SAGE Complete A-Z List |
subjects | Child language Indigenous languages Language diversity Language planning Language revitalization Native language acquisition Northern Amerind languages Speech-language pathology |
title | What about broader impacts for child language acquisition research? A commentary on Kidd and Garcia (2022) |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-20T15%3A39%3A37IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=What%20about%20broader%20impacts%20for%20child%20language%20acquisition%20research?%20A%20commentary%20on%20Kidd%20and%20Garcia%20(2022)&rft.jtitle=First%20language&rft.au=Henke,%20Ryan%20E.&rft.date=2022-12-01&rft.volume=42&rft.issue=6&rft.spage=774&rft.epage=778&rft.pages=774-778&rft.issn=0142-7237&rft.eissn=1740-2344&rft_id=info:doi/10.1177/01427237221081731&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2725966879%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2725966879&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_sage_id=10.1177_01427237221081731&rfr_iscdi=true |