Blockchains and environmental self-determination for the Native Hawaiian people: Toward restorative stewardship of Indigenous lands
Part I sets forth the Four Values of Restorative Justice for Native Peoples, a framework of contextual legal analysis for adjudications impacting Indigenous communities deployed throughout this comment. Part II provides a contextual history of the formation, governance, and mismanagement of the Publ...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Harvard civil rights-civil liberties law review 2022-06, Vol.57 (1), p.393-437 |
---|---|
1. Verfasser: | |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | Part I sets forth the Four Values of Restorative Justice for Native Peoples, a framework of contextual legal analysis for adjudications impacting Indigenous communities deployed throughout this comment. Part II provides a contextual history of the formation, governance, and mismanagement of the Public Land Trust to demonstrate why polycentric stewardship is necessary. Part III explains the right to environmental self-determination and the aspects of blockchain technology that make it especially relevant to Native Peoples seeking increased control over biocultural resources. To illustrate blockchain’s potential, Part IV proposes a polycentric stewardship program for Pohakuloa Training Area, a US military training complex on Hawaii Island that sits on Public Land Trust acreage. This comment ultimately seeks to examine how blockchain can help Kanaka exercise our right to environmental self-determination while holding the state and federal governments accountable for exploiting Hawaii nei (beloved Hawaii). |
---|---|
ISSN: | 0017-8039 1943-5061 |