Spinoza, Marx, and Ilyenkov (who did not know Marx’s transcription of Spinoza)
In this article I start with Marx's transcriptions of Spinoza, and the deep significance of what he transcribed, from the Theologico-Political Treatise and the Correspondence , and in what order. I contend that this demonstrates what was of particular interest and importance to him at that time...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Studies in East European thought 2022-09, Vol.74 (3), p.297-317 |
---|---|
1. Verfasser: | |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | In this article I start with Marx's transcriptions of Spinoza, and the deep significance of what he transcribed, from the Theologico-Political Treatise and the
Correspondence
, and in what order. I contend that this demonstrates what was of particular interest and importance to him at that time. Second, I examine the presence, even if not explicit, of Spinoza in Marx's works, and turn to the question whether Marx was a Spinozist. I think he was. Third, I turn to Ilyenkov and his engagement with Spinoza, and fourth, to Ilyenkov's place in the Marxist tradition of Spinozism. Fifth and sixth, I present an analysis of Ilyenkov's instrumental deployment of Spinoza first in his
Dialectical Logic
and then in his
The Dialectic of the Abstract and the Concrete
in Marx's
Capital
. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 0925-9392 1573-0948 |
DOI: | 10.1007/s11212-021-09413-6 |