When talk is not cheap: What factors predict political campaign messaging on social determinants of health issues?
Political candidates use campaign communication to signal to the public which policy issues they consider important. However, the factors that shape political discourse related to the social determinants of health have not been adequately studied. We examined the volume and predictors of attention t...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | World medical and health policy 2022-09, Vol.14 (3), p.464-489 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 489 |
---|---|
container_issue | 3 |
container_start_page | 464 |
container_title | World medical and health policy |
container_volume | 14 |
creator | Gollust, Sarah E. Frenier, Chris Tait, Margaret Baum, Laura L. Kennedy‐Hendricks, Alene Niederdeppe, Jeff Franklin Fowler, Erika |
description | Political candidates use campaign communication to signal to the public which policy issues they consider important. However, the factors that shape political discourse related to the social determinants of health have not been adequately studied. We examined the volume and predictors of attention to three issues—jobs, income inequality, and early childhood education—among campaign ads in 2011–2012 (N = 10,467 ads, aired 4,025,771 times) and in 2015–2016 (N = 9926 ads, aired 3,809,887 times). While attention to jobs was common in campaign ads (41% and 21% of ads in 2011–2012 and 2015–2016), attention to economic inequality (11% and 4%) and early childhood education (0.4% and 0.9%) was much less common. Campaign‐related factors (especially partisanship) explain much of the variation, as compared to community demographic conditions, although campaign ads referenced jobs more often in areas with higher unemployment in 2015–2016. Future research should explore political responsiveness to the factors that shape health in communities.
Resumen:
Los candidatos políticos utilizan la comunicación de la campaña para indicar al público qué temas de política consideran importantes. Sin embargo, los factores que configuran el discurso político relacionados con los determinantes sociales de la salud no han sido adecuadamente estudiados. Examinamos el volumen y los predictores de atención a tres temas (empleo, desigualdad de ingresos y educación de la primera infancia) entre los anuncios de campaña en 2011‐2012 (N = 10,467 anuncios, transmitidos 4,025,771 veces) y en 2015‐2016 (N = 9,926 anuncios, emitido 3.809.887 veces). Si bien la atención al empleo era común en los anuncios de las campañas (41% y 21% de los anuncios en 2011‐2012 y 2015‐2016), la atención a la desigualdad económica (11%, 4%) y la educación de la primera infancia (0,4%, 0,9%) se mucho menos común. Los factores relacionados con la campaña (especialmente el partidismo) explican gran parte de la variación, en comparación con las condiciones demográficas de la comunidad, aunque los anuncios de la campaña hacen referencia a empleos con mayor frecuencia en áreas con mayor desempleo en 2015‐2016. Las investigaciones futuras deberían explorar la capacidad de respuesta política a los factores que dan forma a la salud en las comunidades.
摘要:
政治候选人通过政治运动向公众传播他们所认为的重要政策议题。不过,就与卫生的社会决定因素相关的政治话语而言,其影响因素还未被充分研究。我们分析了2011‐2012年以及2015‐2016年间政治运动宣传中工作、收入不平等和学前教育这三大议题所获的关注度以及关注的预测物,2011‐2012年共有10,467次宣传广告,播放次数为4,025,771次, |
doi_str_mv | 10.1002/wmh3.470 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2712680851</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2712680851</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c2880-31633b83b507cc65ba323aaf796f11686059634005322a2f6ed0fcc1a80c0f3f3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kM1KAzEURoMoWGrBRwi4cTM1PzOZjBuRolaouFG6DGmadFJnkjFJKX17U-rCjXdzL9zDd-AD4BqjKUaI3O37lk7LGp2BEW5KXpSMk_M_9yWYxLhFeSipm6YZgbBstYNJdl_QRuh8gqrVcriHy1YmaKRKPkQ4BL22KsHBdzZZJTuoZD9Iu3Gw1zHKjXUb6B2MXtn8XOukQ2-ddClCb2BO7FKbBXGn48MVuDCyi3ryu8fg8_npYzYvFu8vr7PHRaEI56igmFG64nRVoVopVq0kJVRKUzfMYMw4Q1XDaIlQRQmRxDC9RkYpLDlSyFBDx-DmlDsE_53FSWz9LrisFKTGhHHEK5yp2xOlgo8xaCOGYHsZDgIjcSxVHEsVudSMFid0bzt9-JcTy7c5PfI_9uB4QA</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2712680851</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>When talk is not cheap: What factors predict political campaign messaging on social determinants of health issues?</title><source>PAIS Index</source><source>Access via Wiley Online Library</source><creator>Gollust, Sarah E. ; Frenier, Chris ; Tait, Margaret ; Baum, Laura L. ; Kennedy‐Hendricks, Alene ; Niederdeppe, Jeff ; Franklin Fowler, Erika</creator><creatorcontrib>Gollust, Sarah E. ; Frenier, Chris ; Tait, Margaret ; Baum, Laura L. ; Kennedy‐Hendricks, Alene ; Niederdeppe, Jeff ; Franklin Fowler, Erika</creatorcontrib><description>Political candidates use campaign communication to signal to the public which policy issues they consider important. However, the factors that shape political discourse related to the social determinants of health have not been adequately studied. We examined the volume and predictors of attention to three issues—jobs, income inequality, and early childhood education—among campaign ads in 2011–2012 (N = 10,467 ads, aired 4,025,771 times) and in 2015–2016 (N = 9926 ads, aired 3,809,887 times). While attention to jobs was common in campaign ads (41% and 21% of ads in 2011–2012 and 2015–2016), attention to economic inequality (11% and 4%) and early childhood education (0.4% and 0.9%) was much less common. Campaign‐related factors (especially partisanship) explain much of the variation, as compared to community demographic conditions, although campaign ads referenced jobs more often in areas with higher unemployment in 2015–2016. Future research should explore political responsiveness to the factors that shape health in communities.
Resumen:
Los candidatos políticos utilizan la comunicación de la campaña para indicar al público qué temas de política consideran importantes. Sin embargo, los factores que configuran el discurso político relacionados con los determinantes sociales de la salud no han sido adecuadamente estudiados. Examinamos el volumen y los predictores de atención a tres temas (empleo, desigualdad de ingresos y educación de la primera infancia) entre los anuncios de campaña en 2011‐2012 (N = 10,467 anuncios, transmitidos 4,025,771 veces) y en 2015‐2016 (N = 9,926 anuncios, emitido 3.809.887 veces). Si bien la atención al empleo era común en los anuncios de las campañas (41% y 21% de los anuncios en 2011‐2012 y 2015‐2016), la atención a la desigualdad económica (11%, 4%) y la educación de la primera infancia (0,4%, 0,9%) se mucho menos común. Los factores relacionados con la campaña (especialmente el partidismo) explican gran parte de la variación, en comparación con las condiciones demográficas de la comunidad, aunque los anuncios de la campaña hacen referencia a empleos con mayor frecuencia en áreas con mayor desempleo en 2015‐2016. Las investigaciones futuras deberían explorar la capacidad de respuesta política a los factores que dan forma a la salud en las comunidades.
摘要:
政治候选人通过政治运动向公众传播他们所认为的重要政策议题。不过,就与卫生的社会决定因素相关的政治话语而言,其影响因素还未被充分研究。我们分析了2011‐2012年以及2015‐2016年间政治运动宣传中工作、收入不平等和学前教育这三大议题所获的关注度以及关注的预测物,2011‐2012年共有10,467次宣传广告,播放次数为4,025,771次,2015‐2016年共有9,926次宣传广告,播放次数为3,809,887次。尽管运动宣传广告中对工作的关注度是常见的(2011‐2012年间和2015‐2016年间各有41%和21%的广告对此表示关注),但对经济不平等的关注度(分别为11%和4%)以及对学前教育的关注度(分别为0.4%和0.9%)却少了许多。与社区人口统计情况相比,与政治运动相关的因素(尤其是党派性)更能解释该差异,尽管2015‐2016年的运动宣传广告在失业率更高的地区更多地提及工作。未来研究应探究社区卫生影响因素的政治响应度。
Key points
• Attention to employment in campaign ads aired in the 2012 and 2016 election cycles is high.
• Attention to economic inequality and early childhood education in campaign ads is much lower.
• Campaign‐related factors, especially partisanship, explain much of the geographic variation in volume.
• Besides community unemployment rates, demographic conditions explain little of the variation in attention to social determinants of health.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1948-4682</identifier><identifier>ISSN: 2153-2028</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1948-4682</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1002/wmh3.470</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Berlin: Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</publisher><subject>advertising ; campañas políticas ; Candidates ; Childhood ; communication ; determinantes sociales de la salud ; Early childhood education ; Education ; Elections ; establecimiento de agenda ; Health ; health policy ; Income inequality ; Inequality ; Partisanship ; Policy analysis ; Political advertising ; Political campaigns ; Political communication ; Political discourse ; politics ; social determinants of health ; Unemployment ; 政治运动,议程设置,卫生的社会决定因素</subject><ispartof>World medical and health policy, 2022-09, Vol.14 (3), p.464-489</ispartof><rights>2021 The Authors. published by Wiley Periodicals LLC on behalf of Policy Studies Organization.</rights><rights>2021. This article is published under http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c2880-31633b83b507cc65ba323aaf796f11686059634005322a2f6ed0fcc1a80c0f3f3</cites><orcidid>0000-0001-6109-5953</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1002%2Fwmh3.470$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1002%2Fwmh3.470$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>315,781,785,1418,27871,27929,27930,45579,45580</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Gollust, Sarah E.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Frenier, Chris</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tait, Margaret</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Baum, Laura L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kennedy‐Hendricks, Alene</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Niederdeppe, Jeff</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Franklin Fowler, Erika</creatorcontrib><title>When talk is not cheap: What factors predict political campaign messaging on social determinants of health issues?</title><title>World medical and health policy</title><description>Political candidates use campaign communication to signal to the public which policy issues they consider important. However, the factors that shape political discourse related to the social determinants of health have not been adequately studied. We examined the volume and predictors of attention to three issues—jobs, income inequality, and early childhood education—among campaign ads in 2011–2012 (N = 10,467 ads, aired 4,025,771 times) and in 2015–2016 (N = 9926 ads, aired 3,809,887 times). While attention to jobs was common in campaign ads (41% and 21% of ads in 2011–2012 and 2015–2016), attention to economic inequality (11% and 4%) and early childhood education (0.4% and 0.9%) was much less common. Campaign‐related factors (especially partisanship) explain much of the variation, as compared to community demographic conditions, although campaign ads referenced jobs more often in areas with higher unemployment in 2015–2016. Future research should explore political responsiveness to the factors that shape health in communities.
Resumen:
Los candidatos políticos utilizan la comunicación de la campaña para indicar al público qué temas de política consideran importantes. Sin embargo, los factores que configuran el discurso político relacionados con los determinantes sociales de la salud no han sido adecuadamente estudiados. Examinamos el volumen y los predictores de atención a tres temas (empleo, desigualdad de ingresos y educación de la primera infancia) entre los anuncios de campaña en 2011‐2012 (N = 10,467 anuncios, transmitidos 4,025,771 veces) y en 2015‐2016 (N = 9,926 anuncios, emitido 3.809.887 veces). Si bien la atención al empleo era común en los anuncios de las campañas (41% y 21% de los anuncios en 2011‐2012 y 2015‐2016), la atención a la desigualdad económica (11%, 4%) y la educación de la primera infancia (0,4%, 0,9%) se mucho menos común. Los factores relacionados con la campaña (especialmente el partidismo) explican gran parte de la variación, en comparación con las condiciones demográficas de la comunidad, aunque los anuncios de la campaña hacen referencia a empleos con mayor frecuencia en áreas con mayor desempleo en 2015‐2016. Las investigaciones futuras deberían explorar la capacidad de respuesta política a los factores que dan forma a la salud en las comunidades.
摘要:
政治候选人通过政治运动向公众传播他们所认为的重要政策议题。不过,就与卫生的社会决定因素相关的政治话语而言,其影响因素还未被充分研究。我们分析了2011‐2012年以及2015‐2016年间政治运动宣传中工作、收入不平等和学前教育这三大议题所获的关注度以及关注的预测物,2011‐2012年共有10,467次宣传广告,播放次数为4,025,771次,2015‐2016年共有9,926次宣传广告,播放次数为3,809,887次。尽管运动宣传广告中对工作的关注度是常见的(2011‐2012年间和2015‐2016年间各有41%和21%的广告对此表示关注),但对经济不平等的关注度(分别为11%和4%)以及对学前教育的关注度(分别为0.4%和0.9%)却少了许多。与社区人口统计情况相比,与政治运动相关的因素(尤其是党派性)更能解释该差异,尽管2015‐2016年的运动宣传广告在失业率更高的地区更多地提及工作。未来研究应探究社区卫生影响因素的政治响应度。
Key points
• Attention to employment in campaign ads aired in the 2012 and 2016 election cycles is high.
• Attention to economic inequality and early childhood education in campaign ads is much lower.
• Campaign‐related factors, especially partisanship, explain much of the geographic variation in volume.
• Besides community unemployment rates, demographic conditions explain little of the variation in attention to social determinants of health.</description><subject>advertising</subject><subject>campañas políticas</subject><subject>Candidates</subject><subject>Childhood</subject><subject>communication</subject><subject>determinantes sociales de la salud</subject><subject>Early childhood education</subject><subject>Education</subject><subject>Elections</subject><subject>establecimiento de agenda</subject><subject>Health</subject><subject>health policy</subject><subject>Income inequality</subject><subject>Inequality</subject><subject>Partisanship</subject><subject>Policy analysis</subject><subject>Political advertising</subject><subject>Political campaigns</subject><subject>Political communication</subject><subject>Political discourse</subject><subject>politics</subject><subject>social determinants of health</subject><subject>Unemployment</subject><subject>政治运动,议程设置,卫生的社会决定因素</subject><issn>1948-4682</issn><issn>2153-2028</issn><issn>1948-4682</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2022</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>24P</sourceid><sourceid>WIN</sourceid><sourceid>7TQ</sourceid><recordid>eNp1kM1KAzEURoMoWGrBRwi4cTM1PzOZjBuRolaouFG6DGmadFJnkjFJKX17U-rCjXdzL9zDd-AD4BqjKUaI3O37lk7LGp2BEW5KXpSMk_M_9yWYxLhFeSipm6YZgbBstYNJdl_QRuh8gqrVcriHy1YmaKRKPkQ4BL22KsHBdzZZJTuoZD9Iu3Gw1zHKjXUb6B2MXtn8XOukQ2-ddClCb2BO7FKbBXGn48MVuDCyi3ryu8fg8_npYzYvFu8vr7PHRaEI56igmFG64nRVoVopVq0kJVRKUzfMYMw4Q1XDaIlQRQmRxDC9RkYpLDlSyFBDx-DmlDsE_53FSWz9LrisFKTGhHHEK5yp2xOlgo8xaCOGYHsZDgIjcSxVHEsVudSMFid0bzt9-JcTy7c5PfI_9uB4QA</recordid><startdate>202209</startdate><enddate>202209</enddate><creator>Gollust, Sarah E.</creator><creator>Frenier, Chris</creator><creator>Tait, Margaret</creator><creator>Baum, Laura L.</creator><creator>Kennedy‐Hendricks, Alene</creator><creator>Niederdeppe, Jeff</creator><creator>Franklin Fowler, Erika</creator><general>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</general><scope>24P</scope><scope>WIN</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7TQ</scope><scope>DHY</scope><scope>DON</scope><scope>K9.</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6109-5953</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>202209</creationdate><title>When talk is not cheap: What factors predict political campaign messaging on social determinants of health issues?</title><author>Gollust, Sarah E. ; Frenier, Chris ; Tait, Margaret ; Baum, Laura L. ; Kennedy‐Hendricks, Alene ; Niederdeppe, Jeff ; Franklin Fowler, Erika</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c2880-31633b83b507cc65ba323aaf796f11686059634005322a2f6ed0fcc1a80c0f3f3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2022</creationdate><topic>advertising</topic><topic>campañas políticas</topic><topic>Candidates</topic><topic>Childhood</topic><topic>communication</topic><topic>determinantes sociales de la salud</topic><topic>Early childhood education</topic><topic>Education</topic><topic>Elections</topic><topic>establecimiento de agenda</topic><topic>Health</topic><topic>health policy</topic><topic>Income inequality</topic><topic>Inequality</topic><topic>Partisanship</topic><topic>Policy analysis</topic><topic>Political advertising</topic><topic>Political campaigns</topic><topic>Political communication</topic><topic>Political discourse</topic><topic>politics</topic><topic>social determinants of health</topic><topic>Unemployment</topic><topic>政治运动,议程设置,卫生的社会决定因素</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Gollust, Sarah E.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Frenier, Chris</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tait, Margaret</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Baum, Laura L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kennedy‐Hendricks, Alene</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Niederdeppe, Jeff</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Franklin Fowler, Erika</creatorcontrib><collection>Wiley Online Library (Open Access Collection)</collection><collection>Wiley Online Library (Open Access Collection)</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>PAIS Index</collection><collection>PAIS International</collection><collection>PAIS International (Ovid)</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><jtitle>World medical and health policy</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Gollust, Sarah E.</au><au>Frenier, Chris</au><au>Tait, Margaret</au><au>Baum, Laura L.</au><au>Kennedy‐Hendricks, Alene</au><au>Niederdeppe, Jeff</au><au>Franklin Fowler, Erika</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>When talk is not cheap: What factors predict political campaign messaging on social determinants of health issues?</atitle><jtitle>World medical and health policy</jtitle><date>2022-09</date><risdate>2022</risdate><volume>14</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>464</spage><epage>489</epage><pages>464-489</pages><issn>1948-4682</issn><issn>2153-2028</issn><eissn>1948-4682</eissn><abstract>Political candidates use campaign communication to signal to the public which policy issues they consider important. However, the factors that shape political discourse related to the social determinants of health have not been adequately studied. We examined the volume and predictors of attention to three issues—jobs, income inequality, and early childhood education—among campaign ads in 2011–2012 (N = 10,467 ads, aired 4,025,771 times) and in 2015–2016 (N = 9926 ads, aired 3,809,887 times). While attention to jobs was common in campaign ads (41% and 21% of ads in 2011–2012 and 2015–2016), attention to economic inequality (11% and 4%) and early childhood education (0.4% and 0.9%) was much less common. Campaign‐related factors (especially partisanship) explain much of the variation, as compared to community demographic conditions, although campaign ads referenced jobs more often in areas with higher unemployment in 2015–2016. Future research should explore political responsiveness to the factors that shape health in communities.
Resumen:
Los candidatos políticos utilizan la comunicación de la campaña para indicar al público qué temas de política consideran importantes. Sin embargo, los factores que configuran el discurso político relacionados con los determinantes sociales de la salud no han sido adecuadamente estudiados. Examinamos el volumen y los predictores de atención a tres temas (empleo, desigualdad de ingresos y educación de la primera infancia) entre los anuncios de campaña en 2011‐2012 (N = 10,467 anuncios, transmitidos 4,025,771 veces) y en 2015‐2016 (N = 9,926 anuncios, emitido 3.809.887 veces). Si bien la atención al empleo era común en los anuncios de las campañas (41% y 21% de los anuncios en 2011‐2012 y 2015‐2016), la atención a la desigualdad económica (11%, 4%) y la educación de la primera infancia (0,4%, 0,9%) se mucho menos común. Los factores relacionados con la campaña (especialmente el partidismo) explican gran parte de la variación, en comparación con las condiciones demográficas de la comunidad, aunque los anuncios de la campaña hacen referencia a empleos con mayor frecuencia en áreas con mayor desempleo en 2015‐2016. Las investigaciones futuras deberían explorar la capacidad de respuesta política a los factores que dan forma a la salud en las comunidades.
摘要:
政治候选人通过政治运动向公众传播他们所认为的重要政策议题。不过,就与卫生的社会决定因素相关的政治话语而言,其影响因素还未被充分研究。我们分析了2011‐2012年以及2015‐2016年间政治运动宣传中工作、收入不平等和学前教育这三大议题所获的关注度以及关注的预测物,2011‐2012年共有10,467次宣传广告,播放次数为4,025,771次,2015‐2016年共有9,926次宣传广告,播放次数为3,809,887次。尽管运动宣传广告中对工作的关注度是常见的(2011‐2012年间和2015‐2016年间各有41%和21%的广告对此表示关注),但对经济不平等的关注度(分别为11%和4%)以及对学前教育的关注度(分别为0.4%和0.9%)却少了许多。与社区人口统计情况相比,与政治运动相关的因素(尤其是党派性)更能解释该差异,尽管2015‐2016年的运动宣传广告在失业率更高的地区更多地提及工作。未来研究应探究社区卫生影响因素的政治响应度。
Key points
• Attention to employment in campaign ads aired in the 2012 and 2016 election cycles is high.
• Attention to economic inequality and early childhood education in campaign ads is much lower.
• Campaign‐related factors, especially partisanship, explain much of the geographic variation in volume.
• Besides community unemployment rates, demographic conditions explain little of the variation in attention to social determinants of health.</abstract><cop>Berlin</cop><pub>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</pub><doi>10.1002/wmh3.470</doi><tpages>26</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6109-5953</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1948-4682 |
ispartof | World medical and health policy, 2022-09, Vol.14 (3), p.464-489 |
issn | 1948-4682 2153-2028 1948-4682 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_2712680851 |
source | PAIS Index; Access via Wiley Online Library |
subjects | advertising campañas políticas Candidates Childhood communication determinantes sociales de la salud Early childhood education Education Elections establecimiento de agenda Health health policy Income inequality Inequality Partisanship Policy analysis Political advertising Political campaigns Political communication Political discourse politics social determinants of health Unemployment 政治运动,议程设置,卫生的社会决定因素 |
title | When talk is not cheap: What factors predict political campaign messaging on social determinants of health issues? |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-16T09%3A33%3A14IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=When%20talk%20is%20not%20cheap:%20What%20factors%20predict%20political%20campaign%20messaging%20on%20social%20determinants%20of%20health%20issues?&rft.jtitle=World%20medical%20and%20health%20policy&rft.au=Gollust,%20Sarah%20E.&rft.date=2022-09&rft.volume=14&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=464&rft.epage=489&rft.pages=464-489&rft.issn=1948-4682&rft.eissn=1948-4682&rft_id=info:doi/10.1002/wmh3.470&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2712680851%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2712680851&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |