Pembrolizumab versus placebo as post-nephrectomy adjuvant therapy for clear cell renal cell carcinoma (KEYNOTE-564): 30-month follow-up analysis of a multicentre, randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase 3 trial

The first interim analysis of the KEYNOTE-564 study showed improved disease-free survival with adjuvant pembrolizumab compared with placebo after surgery in patients with clear cell renal cell carcinoma at an increased risk of recurrence. The analysis reported here, with an additional 6 months of fo...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:The lancet oncology 2022-09, Vol.23 (9), p.1133-1144
Hauptverfasser: Tomczak, Piotr, Venugopal, Balaji, Ferguson, Thomas, Chang, Yen-Hwa, Gross-Goupil, Marine, Burgents, Joseph E, Xu, Lei, Imai, Kentaro, Choueiri, Toni K, Lin, Tzu-Ping, Symeonides, Stefan N., Sawrycki, Piotr, Haas, Naomi B., Sarwar, Naveed, Thiery-Vuillemin, Antoine, Doshi, Gurjyot, Melichar, Bohuslav, Kopyltsov, Evgeniy, Hammers, Hans-Joerg, Menezes, Juliana de Janoski, Winquist, Eric W., Hamzaj, Alketa, Karaszewska, Boguslawa, Lipatov, Oleg N., McDermott, David, Kochuparambil, Samith T., Davis, Ian D., Peltola, Katriina, Sabbatini, Roberto, Shkolnik, Michail I., McCune, Steven, Yeung, Carrie, Laguerre, Brigitte, Fomin, Eugeniy A., Zakharia, Yousef, Yorio, Jeffrey T., Yanez Ruiz, Eduardo, Kimura, Go, Nishimura, Kazuo, Masumori, Naoya, Kato, Haruaki, Sala Gonzalez, Nuria, Chiu, Kun-Yuan, Atkins, Michael B., Heath, Elisabeth, Feyerabend, Susan, Numakura, Kazuyuki, Zukov, Ruslan, Maroto Rey, Pablo Jose, Chang, Chao-Hsiang, Vengalil, Salil, Waddell, Tom S., Hauke, Ralph, Jayram, Gautam, Estay, Angela, Rubiano, Juan Andres, Anai, Satoshi, Tsunemori, Hiroyuki, Sikora-Kupis, Bozena, Gunderson, Elizabeth, Koletsky, Alan, Chen, Kevin, Agrawal, Manish, Parnis, Francis, Barbosa, Fernando Maciel, Faucher, Genevieve, Iqbal, Nayyer, Hanna, Nawar, Ibanez, Carolina, Manneh, Ray, Holeckova, Petra, Ronkainen, Hanna, Abadie-Lacourtoisie, Sophie, Goebell, Peter J., Hoefner, Thomas, Schultze-Seemann, Wolfgang, Yokomizo, Akira, Matsukawa, Yoshihisa, Murakami, Yoji, Kim, Miso, Szczylik, Cezary, Humphreys, Alison C., Kumar, Birendra, Karam, Jose Antonio, Fleming, Mark, Zarba, Juan Jose, Leiva, Viviana E., Antonio Junior, Joao Neif, Rocha, Roberto Odebrecht, Muniz, David, Brust, Leandro, Graham, Jeffrey, Borchiellini, Delphine, McDermott, Ray, Miura, Yuji, Prow, Debra M., Hashemi-Sadraei, Neda, Kendall, Stephan D.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:The first interim analysis of the KEYNOTE-564 study showed improved disease-free survival with adjuvant pembrolizumab compared with placebo after surgery in patients with clear cell renal cell carcinoma at an increased risk of recurrence. The analysis reported here, with an additional 6 months of follow-up, was designed to assess longer-term efficacy and safety of pembrolizumab versus placebo, as well as additional secondary and exploratory endpoints. In the multicentre, randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase 3 KEYNOTE-564 trial, adults aged 18 years or older with clear cell renal cell carcinoma with an increased risk of recurrence were enrolled at 213 hospitals and cancer centres in North America, South America, Europe, Asia, and Australia. Eligible participants had an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status of 0 or 1, had undergone nephrectomy 12 weeks or less before randomisation, and had not received previous systemic therapy for advanced renal cell carcinoma. Participants were randomly assigned (1:1) via central permuted block randomisation (block size of four) to receive pembrolizumab 200 mg or placebo intravenously every 3 weeks for up to 17 cycles. Randomisation was stratified by metastatic disease status (M0 vs M1), and the M0 group was further stratified by ECOG performance status and geographical region. All participants and investigators involved in study treatment administration were masked to the treatment group assignment. The primary endpoint was disease-free survival by investigator assessment in the intention-to-treat population (all participants randomly assigned to a treatment). Safety was assessed in the safety population, comprising all participants who received at least one dose of pembrolizumab or placebo. As the primary endpoint was met at the first interim analysis, updated data are reported without p values. This study is ongoing, but no longer recruiting, and is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT03142334. Between June 30, 2017, and Sept 20, 2019, 994 participants were assigned to receive pembrolizumab (n=496) or placebo (n=498). Median follow-up, defined as the time from randomisation to data cutoff (June 14, 2021), was 30·1 months (IQR 25·7–36·7). Disease-free survival was better with pembrolizumab compared with placebo (HR 0·63 [95% CI 0·50–0·80]). Median disease-free survival was not reached in either group. The most common all-cause grade 3–4 adverse events were hypertension (in 14 [3%] of 496
ISSN:1470-2045
1474-5488
DOI:10.1016/S1470-2045(22)00487-9