A Study of Interfacial Wettability of Glass Spreading on a Silicon Substrate
This paper considers glass used for crystalline silicon solar cells as the research object, exploring the wetting behavior of glass spreading on a silicon substrate. A method is proposed to evaluate the wettability of glass. The characteristic temperature points and melting process of glass were rec...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Journal of electronic materials 2022-10, Vol.51 (10), p.5818-5831 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | This paper considers glass used for crystalline silicon solar cells as the research object, exploring the wetting behavior of glass spreading on a silicon substrate. A method is proposed to evaluate the wettability of glass. The characteristic temperature points and melting process of glass were recorded using a hot-stage microscope. The melting footage was processed using MATLAB. The specific steps included establishing a pixel coordinate in the video with MATLAB, and the reference point slope (
k
) was monitored in real time. The
k
curve was subsequently fitted via Fourier transform, and the derivative of the time value was taken. It was found that the better the sample wettability, the closer the R
2
(goodness of fit) value was to 1. Meanwhile, two types of glass melting modes were identified through the results yielded by the hot-stage microscope. The difference between the two modes was the formation of a spherical shape during the melting process. Through the combination of the MATLAB analysis and the hot-stage microscope results, it was found that when the sample had a spherical temperature, the value of
∂
k
∂
t
was partially larger than 0 and partially smaller than 0. However, when the sample did not have a spherical temperature, the values of
∂
k
∂
t
were all less than 0. In addition, other experimental phenomena were observed by SEM and EDS, which highlight the difference in wettability between the two models. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 0361-5235 1543-186X |
DOI: | 10.1007/s11664-022-09683-8 |