A physics-informed dynamic deep autoencoder for accurate state-of-health prediction of lithium-ion battery
Lithium-ion batteries (LIBs) are currently the standard for energy storage in portable consumer electronic devices. They are also used in electric vehicles and in some large industrial settings and for grid power storage. The adverse consequences of a dramatic battery failure can be significant comp...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Neural computing & applications 2022-09, Vol.34 (18), p.15997-16017 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | Lithium-ion batteries (LIBs) are currently the standard for energy storage in portable consumer electronic devices. They are also used in electric vehicles and in some large industrial settings and for grid power storage. The adverse consequences of a dramatic battery failure can be significant compared with the cost of timely replacement or maintenance. Consequently, accurate state-of-health (SOH) prediction is important to inform maintenance or replacement decisions. In this work, we address current challenges related to accuracy and interpretability in data-driven SOH prediction for LIBs by devising a novel physics-informed machine learning prognostic model, termed PIDDA. PIDDA includes three elements: an autoencoder, a physics-informed model training, and a physics-based prediction adjustment. We examine and benchmark our model against alternative data-driven SOH prediction models using the NASA battery prognostic dataset. The computational experiments demonstrate that PIDDA (1) provides significantly higher prediction accuracy; (2) requires less prior data for its predictions; (3) produces more informative and interpretable predictions than alternative models. We conclude with an ablation study of PIDDA to analyze the relative effectiveness of two of its elements, the physics equations in the model training and the physics-based prediction adjustment. The results show that the former (training) provides the heavy lifting in accuracy improvement, roughly two-thirds, and the latter (adjustment) the remaining incremental improvement. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 0941-0643 1433-3058 |
DOI: | 10.1007/s00521-022-07291-5 |