A physics-informed dynamic deep autoencoder for accurate state-of-health prediction of lithium-ion battery

Lithium-ion batteries (LIBs) are currently the standard for energy storage in portable consumer electronic devices. They are also used in electric vehicles and in some large industrial settings and for grid power storage. The adverse consequences of a dramatic battery failure can be significant comp...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Neural computing & applications 2022-09, Vol.34 (18), p.15997-16017
Hauptverfasser: Xu, Zhaoyi, Guo, Yanjie, Saleh, Joseph Homer
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Lithium-ion batteries (LIBs) are currently the standard for energy storage in portable consumer electronic devices. They are also used in electric vehicles and in some large industrial settings and for grid power storage. The adverse consequences of a dramatic battery failure can be significant compared with the cost of timely replacement or maintenance. Consequently, accurate state-of-health (SOH) prediction is important to inform maintenance or replacement decisions. In this work, we address current challenges related to accuracy and interpretability in data-driven SOH prediction for LIBs by devising a novel physics-informed machine learning prognostic model, termed PIDDA. PIDDA includes three elements: an autoencoder, a physics-informed model training, and a physics-based prediction adjustment. We examine and benchmark our model against alternative data-driven SOH prediction models using the NASA battery prognostic dataset. The computational experiments demonstrate that PIDDA (1) provides significantly higher prediction accuracy; (2) requires less prior data for its predictions; (3) produces more informative and interpretable predictions than alternative models. We conclude with an ablation study of PIDDA to analyze the relative effectiveness of two of its elements, the physics equations in the model training and the physics-based prediction adjustment. The results show that the former (training) provides the heavy lifting in accuracy improvement, roughly two-thirds, and the latter (adjustment) the remaining incremental improvement.
ISSN:0941-0643
1433-3058
DOI:10.1007/s00521-022-07291-5