Value of human‐modified forests for the conservation of canopy epiphytes

Human‐modified forests—HMFs—now cover more area worldwide than primary forests and could help buffering the ongoing species loss. However, their role in protecting canopy epiphytes remains unclear, partially because these communities require large trees, high humidity, and shade, conditions which ar...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Biotropica 2022-07, Vol.54 (4), p.958-968
Hauptverfasser: Parra‐Sanchez, Edicson, Banks‐Leite, Cristina
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Human‐modified forests—HMFs—now cover more area worldwide than primary forests and could help buffering the ongoing species loss. However, their role in protecting canopy epiphytes remains unclear, partially because these communities require large trees, high humidity, and shade, conditions which are rare in HMFs. Here, we assessed how canopy epiphytes, in different ontogenetic stages, are structured in HMFs. Specifically, we evaluated how species richness, total abundance, and community composition, and how abundance of seedlings and juveniles, are affected by the local and landscape context in the Atlantic Forest of Brazil. Across all sites, we found 82.9% of species and 75.5% of individuals exclusively in old‐growth forest, while HMFs hosted only 15.5% of all species, sharing 75% of their species with old‐growth forests communities, and pastures hosted 1% of species richness and 2.8% of individuals sharing 60% of their species with old‐growth forest communities. We also found that seedling and juveniles were twice as abundant than adults in old‐growth forest, similarly abundant to adults in HMFs and absent from pastures. Low numbers of individuals in early ontogenetic stages in HMFs and pastures are likely to impact future generations of epiphytes in these areas. Although HMFs provide important refuge for many species, our results show that they do not provide suitable conditions for the maintenance of current or future canopy epiphyte communities. Our findings suggest that conserving large continuous old‐growth forests is the only viable conservation option for protecting most vascular epiphytes. in Portuguese is available with online material. Resumen Atualmente, florestas modificadas pelo homem—FMHs—cobrem mais área em todo o mundo do que florestas primarias e poderiam ajudar a conter a atual perda de espécies. Porém, seu papel na preservação de epífitas de dossel permanece incerto, parcialmente porque esas comunidades requerem sombra, árvores grandes e alta umidade, condições raras em FMHs. No presente estudo, avaliamos como as epífitas de dossel, em diferentes estágios ontogenéticos, estão estruturadas em FMHs. Especificamente, avaliamos como a riqueza de espécies, a abundância total e composição da comunidade, assim como a abundância de plântulas e de juvenis, são afetadas pelo contexto local e paisagístico em florestas da Mata Atlântica do Brasil. Em todos os locais, encontramos que 82.9% das espécies, e 75.5% dos indivíduos, foram exclusivas das
ISSN:0006-3606
1744-7429
DOI:10.1111/btp.13119