Wide tolerance to environmental conditions and substrate colonization mediates the invasion of false mussels (Bivalvia: Dreissenidae) in brackish systems
False mussels are recognized as the brackish water equivalent of zebra mussels, although the abiotic and habitat conditions that mediate these invaders’ success are barely known. In this context, we aimed to evaluate the native and non-native geographical distribution of Mytilopsis species worldwide...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Biological invasions 2022-07, Vol.24 (7), p.2245-2260 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | False mussels are recognized as the brackish water equivalent of zebra mussels, although the abiotic and habitat conditions that mediate these invaders’ success are barely known. In this context, we aimed to evaluate the native and non-native geographical distribution of
Mytilopsis
species worldwide and assess biological traits, environmental condition, and habitat associated with false mussels in native and invaded systems. Our hypothesis is that
Mytilopsis
invasion is driven by species tolerance to environmental conditions and substrate use in brackish systems, where the colonization of non-native populations is favored by great availability of artificial substrates and tolerance to wide ranges of environmental conditions. In addition, this study provides the range and distribution patterns of
Mytilopsis
species within their introduced and native areas and documents the spread of introduced populations worldwide. Considering the five species evaluated,
M. leucophaeata
and
M. sallei
are the most widespread, while
M. adamsi
,
M. trautwineana,
and
M. africana
showed more restricted geographic distribution. In the last decades,
M. leucophaeata
and
M. sallei
consolidated and expanded their distributions. Environmental conditions were significantly different between native and non-native areas, where
Mytilopsis
populations presented significantly higher densities. Non-native populations exhibited remarkable plasticity concerning habitat colonization that was more frequent on artificial substrata.
Mytilopsis
populations presented significant differences in their biological traits, habitat environmental conditions, and substrate use between native and non-native areas. These species seem to adapt to the conditions of invaded systems, changing their preferences, which may reflect plasticity and a potential shift of their realized niches. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 1387-3547 1573-1464 |
DOI: | 10.1007/s10530-022-02772-z |