Psychometric properties of the PTSD Checklist for DSM-5 in a sample of trauma exposed mental health service users
Background: PTSD self-report measures are frequently used in mental health services but very few have been evaluated in clinical samples that include civilians. The PCL-5 was developed to assess for DSM-5 PTSD. Objective: The aim of this study was to evaluate the psychometric properties of the PCL-5...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | European journal of psychotraumatology 2021-01, Vol.12 (1), p.1863578-1863578 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | Background: PTSD self-report measures are frequently used in mental health services but very few have been evaluated in clinical samples that include civilians. The PCL-5 was developed to assess for DSM-5 PTSD.
Objective: The aim of this study was to evaluate the psychometric properties of the PCL-5 in a sample of trauma-exposed mental health service users who were evidencing symptoms of PTSD.
Method: Reliability and validity of the PCL-5 were investigated in a sample of 273 participants who reported past diagnosis for PTSD or who had screened positively for traumatic stress symptoms. Diagnostic utility was evaluated in comparison to the Clinician-Administered PTSD Scale for DSM-5 (CAPS-5).
Results: The PCL-5 demonstrated high internal consistency, good convergent and divergent validity, acceptable stability and good diagnostic utility. However, operating characteristics differed from those found in other samples. Scores of 43-44 provided optimal efficiency for diagnosing PTSD. A post hoc regression analysis showed that depression explained more of the variance in PCL-5 total score than the CAPS-5.
Conclusion: Whilst the PCL-5 is psychometrically sound it appears to have difficulty differentiating self-reported depression and anxiety symptoms from PTSD in trauma-exposed mental health service users and clinicians should take care to assess full symptomatology when individuals screen positively on the PCL-5. Clinicians and researchers should also take care not to assume that operating characteristics of self-report PTSD measures are valid for mental health service users, when these have been established in other populations.
* The PCL-5 demonstrated good psychometric properties in this sample of trauma-exposed mental health service users.
* An optimal cut off score of 43-44 was higher than reported in other studies evaluating the PCL-5.
* A post-hoc analysis suggested that the PCL-5 has difficulty differentiating self-reported depression and anxiety symptoms from PTSD.
* Clinicians should undertake further assessment to establish differential diagnosis when PCL-5 scores are raised. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 2000-8066 2000-8198 2000-8066 |
DOI: | 10.1080/20008198.2020.1863578 |