Delta-DAGMM: A Free Rider Attack Detection Model in Horizontal Federated Learning

Federated learning is a machine learning framework proposed in recent years. In horizontal federated learning, multiple participants cooperate to train and obtain a common final model. Participants only need to transmit the local updated model instead of local datasets. Some participants do not use...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Security and communication networks 2022-06, Vol.2022, p.1-13
Hauptverfasser: Huang, Hai, Zhang, Borong, Sun, Yinggang, Ma, Chao, Qu, Jiaxing
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Federated learning is a machine learning framework proposed in recent years. In horizontal federated learning, multiple participants cooperate to train and obtain a common final model. Participants only need to transmit the local updated model instead of local datasets. Some participants do not use effective local data sets, but provide disguised model parameters to participate in federal training and obtain common training models. This attack is called Free-rider attack. To the best of our knowledge, researches have proposed some Free-rider attack strategies with theoretical support, but there are few researches on Free-rider attack detection. However, the model disguised by some attackers using special attack strategies is similar to the real model in terms of convergence and weight, so it is difficult to detect the model provided by attacker as abnormal data. Based on DAGMM, a high-dimensional abnormal data detection model, this paper optimizes the sample processing and compression model, and proposes an improved detection algorithm, called Delta-DAGMM. Two types of large datasets are used for experiments. The experimental results show that Delta-DAGMM has higher precision and F1 score than DAGMM. On average, the Delta-DAGMM algorithm achieves a precision of 98.42% and an F1 score of 98.36%.
ISSN:1939-0114
1939-0122
DOI:10.1155/2022/8928790