INDONESIAN DESIRIOUS FINALITY OF THE COMMUNITY IN REGARD

INDONESIAN DESIRIOUS FINALITY OF THE COMMUNITY IN REGARD

This article reviews the constitutional status of constitutionally guaranteed final decisions of the Constitutional Court. This is a very important status as it could lead to the position of the Court of Justice in the Constitutional Court. This article is opposed to this option. The status of the d...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of legal, ethical and regulatory issues ethical and regulatory issues, 2021-01, Vol.24, p.1-10
Hauptverfasser: Abadi, Suwarno, Endarto, Budi, Taufiqurrahman, Aji, Rihantoro Bayu, Kurniawan, Wahyu, Daim, Nuriyanto A, Ismono, Joko, Alam, Arief Syahrul, Purwati, Ani, Wijaya, Andy Usmina, Chamdani, Widianto, Rahmadi Mulyo, Kusnadi, Sekaring Ayumeida, Saleh, Farhan, Indriastuti, Dwi Elok, Setiabudi, Wawan, Prasetyo, Indra, Aliyyah, Nabilah, Sunyoto, Kodrat, Endarti, Esa Wahyu, Mardiana, Fitra, Mulyani, Sri, Rusdiyanto, Kalbuana, Nawang
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Constitutional courts
Constitutional law
Constitutions
Court decisions
Judicial reviews
Judiciary
Legislatures
Public officials
State court decisions
Supreme Court decisions
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:This article reviews the constitutional status of constitutionally guaranteed final decisions of the Constitutional Court. This is a very important status as it could lead to the position of the Court of Justice in the Constitutional Court. This article is opposed to this option. The status of the decisions of the Constitutional Court should be criticized on the ground that their purpose is prima facie rather than absolute. This article adopts an office stand as a solution, so that the court and the legislature have no supreme authority to interpret the constitution.
ISSN:1544-0036
1544-0044