Federalism and the politics of oil and gas pipelines in Canada (Alberta) and the United States (Texas)

In recent years, pipeline policy has been a significant and controversial issue in Canadian politics. In the United States, pipeline projects to increase transportation capacity for Texas oil have also been high on the energy agenda, but they have not permeated national politics like in Canada. In f...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Politics & policy (Statesboro, Ga.) Ga.), 2022-06, Vol.50 (3), p.487-502
Hauptverfasser: Lecours, André, Béland, Daniel
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:In recent years, pipeline policy has been a significant and controversial issue in Canadian politics. In the United States, pipeline projects to increase transportation capacity for Texas oil have also been high on the energy agenda, but they have not permeated national politics like in Canada. In fact, new pipelines to transport oil and gas out of Texas' Permian Basin have multiplied without generating serious national controversy or intergovernmental conflicts. This article develops an explanation for these distinct political outcomes in Canada and the United States. The article identifies three factors that have contributed to pipeline projects triggering serious intergovernmental conflicts in Canada around Alberta oil but not in the United States in relation to the transportation of Texas oil: (1) pipeline structures and the regulatory framework for oil and gas; (2) the ideological and political support for, or opposition to, oil and gas development; and (3) the level of Indigenous opposition to pipeline projects. Related Articles Ash, John S. 2011. “Radiation or Riots: Risk Perception in Nuclear Power Decision Making and Deliberative Approaches to Resolving Stakeholder Conflict.” Politics & Policy 39(2): 317–44. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1747‐1346.2010.00237.x. Mahafza, Zachary, Jonathan M. Fisk, and David P. Adams. 2021. “Crude Contempt: Examining Local Pushback to Oil and Gas Development in California.” Politics & Policy 49(2): 479–501. https://doi.org/10.1111/polp.12401. Neill, Katharine A., and John C. Morris. 2012. “A Tangled Web of Principals and Agents: Examining the Deepwater Horizon Oil Spill through a Principal‐Agent Lens.” Politics & Policy 40(4): 629–56. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1747‐1346.2012.00371.x. Federalismo y la política de los oleoductos y gasoductos en Canadá (Alberta) y Estados Unidos (Texas) En los últimos años, la política de oleoductos ha sido un tema importante y controvertido en la política canadiense. En los Estados Unidos, los proyectos de oleoductos para aumentar la capacidad de transporte del petróleo de Texas también han ocupado un lugar destacado en la agenda energética, pero no han permeado la política nacional como en Canadá. De hecho, se han multiplicado los nuevos oleoductos para transportar petróleo y gas fuera de la Cuenca Pérmica de Texas sin generar controversias nacionales serias o conflictos intergubernamentales. Este artículo desarrolla una explicación de estos distintos resultados políticos en Canadá y Est
ISSN:1555-5623
1747-1346
DOI:10.1111/polp.12468