Longitudinal tendon healing assessed with multi‐modality advanced imaging and tissue analysis
Background The range of diagnostic modalities available to evaluate superficial digital flexor tendon (SDFT) injury includes magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), computed tomography (CT) and ultrasonography (US). Direct, comprehensive comparison of multi‐modality imaging characteristics to end‐point da...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Equine veterinary journal 2022-07, Vol.54 (4), p.766-781 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | Background
The range of diagnostic modalities available to evaluate superficial digital flexor tendon (SDFT) injury includes magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), computed tomography (CT) and ultrasonography (US). Direct, comprehensive comparison of multi‐modality imaging characteristics to end‐point data has not previously been performed using a model of tendinopathy but is required to obtain a better understanding of each modality's diagnostic capabilities.
Objective
To compare CT, MRI and US evaluation to outcome measures for histologic, biochemical and biomechanical parameters using an equine surgical model of tendinopathy.
Study design
Controlled experiment.
Methods
Lesions were surgically created in both forelimb SDFTs of eight horses and imaged using MRI, CT and US at seven time points over 12 months. Imaging characteristics were then correlated to end point histologic, biochemical and biomechanical data using lasso regression. Longitudinal lesion size was compared between imaging modalities.
Results
Lesion to tendon isoattenuation on CT evaluation correlated with the greatest levels of aggrecan deposition. A significant correlation between cellular density and percentage of tendon involvement on the T2‐weighted sequence and signal intensity on the proton density fat saturated (PD FS) sequence was appreciated at the 12‐month time point (P = .006, P = .02 respectively). There was no significant correlation between end‐point data and US or contrast imaging characteristics. Cross sectional area lesion to tendon measurements were significantly largest on CT evaluation, followed by MRI and then US (P |
---|---|
ISSN: | 0425-1644 2042-3306 |
DOI: | 10.1111/evj.13478 |