Using inclusive assessments to support ethical decision making in organizations
First stage: [...]stage: [...]stage: The ethical responsibility of assessment scientists lies in preserving the psychometric properties and legal defensibility of the assessment while making informed decisions that best balance the goals of the organization and the needs of the candidates. [...]care...
Gespeichert in:
| Veröffentlicht in: | Industrial and organizational psychology 2022-06, Vol.15 (2), p.246-249 |
|---|---|
| Hauptverfasser: | , |
| Format: | Artikel |
| Sprache: | eng |
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
| Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
| container_end_page | 249 |
|---|---|
| container_issue | 2 |
| container_start_page | 246 |
| container_title | Industrial and organizational psychology |
| container_volume | 15 |
| creator | Allen, Kristin S. Burnard, Mark |
| description | First stage: [...]stage: [...]stage: The ethical responsibility of assessment scientists lies in preserving the psychometric properties and legal defensibility of the assessment while making informed decisions that best balance the goals of the organization and the needs of the candidates. [...]careful consideration should be given to the weighting of the assessment components. When enough data on localized versions of assessment content becomes available, measurement equivalence should be established through confirmatory factor analysis procedures. [...]assessment scientists have a responsibility to continuous monitoring, validation, and an openness to new iterations of assessment programs based on these findings. [...]the framework for ethical decision making proposed in the focal article is a useful guide for industrial-organizational psychologists. |
| doi_str_mv | 10.1017/iop.2022.7 |
| format | Article |
| fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2669422626</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><cupid>10_1017_iop_2022_7</cupid><sourcerecordid>2669422626</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c1006-da13e16b02c78c51b6a75c0f7c28d48cf5224891a486de25261a2ddaf21e0fb33</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNptkE9LAzEQxYMoWKsXP0HAm7g1mc0m26MU_0GhF3sO2Wy2pnY3a2ZX0E9vSkUvnmYYfvMe7xFyydmMM65ufehnwABm6ohMuCpENhe5OP7dQZ6SM8QtYzIHJiZktUbfbajv7G5E_-GoQXSIresGpEOgOPZ9iAN1w6u3ZkdrZz360NHWvB0eaYgb0_kvM6QznpOTxuzQXfzMKVk_3L8snrLl6vF5cbfMLE_eWW147risGFhV2oJX0qjCskZZKGtR2qYAEOWcG1HK2kEBkhuoa9MAd6yp8nxKrg66fQzvo8NBb8MYu2SpQcoUFCTIRF0fKBsDYnSN7qNvTfzUnOl9YToVpveFaZXgmx_YtFX09cb9af6DfwN-iG2-</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2669422626</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Using inclusive assessments to support ethical decision making in organizations</title><source>Cambridge Journals</source><creator>Allen, Kristin S. ; Burnard, Mark</creator><creatorcontrib>Allen, Kristin S. ; Burnard, Mark</creatorcontrib><description>First stage: [...]stage: [...]stage: The ethical responsibility of assessment scientists lies in preserving the psychometric properties and legal defensibility of the assessment while making informed decisions that best balance the goals of the organization and the needs of the candidates. [...]careful consideration should be given to the weighting of the assessment components. When enough data on localized versions of assessment content becomes available, measurement equivalence should be established through confirmatory factor analysis procedures. [...]assessment scientists have a responsibility to continuous monitoring, validation, and an openness to new iterations of assessment programs based on these findings. [...]the framework for ethical decision making proposed in the focal article is a useful guide for industrial-organizational psychologists.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1754-9426</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1754-9434</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1017/iop.2022.7</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>New York, USA: Cambridge University Press</publisher><subject>Ability tests ; Best practice ; Candidates ; Cognitive ability ; Commentaries ; Decision making ; Disability ; Ethics ; Inclusion ; Labor shortages ; Multiculturalism & pluralism ; Psychologists ; Quantitative psychology ; Scientists ; Validity</subject><ispartof>Industrial and organizational psychology, 2022-06, Vol.15 (2), p.246-249</ispartof><rights>The Author(s), 2022. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of the Society for Industrial and Organizational Psychology</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c1006-da13e16b02c78c51b6a75c0f7c28d48cf5224891a486de25261a2ddaf21e0fb33</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.cambridge.org/core/product/identifier/S1754942622000074/type/journal_article$$EHTML$$P50$$Gcambridge$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>164,314,776,780,27901,27902,55603</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Allen, Kristin S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Burnard, Mark</creatorcontrib><title>Using inclusive assessments to support ethical decision making in organizations</title><title>Industrial and organizational psychology</title><addtitle>Ind. Organ. Psychol</addtitle><description>First stage: [...]stage: [...]stage: The ethical responsibility of assessment scientists lies in preserving the psychometric properties and legal defensibility of the assessment while making informed decisions that best balance the goals of the organization and the needs of the candidates. [...]careful consideration should be given to the weighting of the assessment components. When enough data on localized versions of assessment content becomes available, measurement equivalence should be established through confirmatory factor analysis procedures. [...]assessment scientists have a responsibility to continuous monitoring, validation, and an openness to new iterations of assessment programs based on these findings. [...]the framework for ethical decision making proposed in the focal article is a useful guide for industrial-organizational psychologists.</description><subject>Ability tests</subject><subject>Best practice</subject><subject>Candidates</subject><subject>Cognitive ability</subject><subject>Commentaries</subject><subject>Decision making</subject><subject>Disability</subject><subject>Ethics</subject><subject>Inclusion</subject><subject>Labor shortages</subject><subject>Multiculturalism & pluralism</subject><subject>Psychologists</subject><subject>Quantitative psychology</subject><subject>Scientists</subject><subject>Validity</subject><issn>1754-9426</issn><issn>1754-9434</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2022</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><recordid>eNptkE9LAzEQxYMoWKsXP0HAm7g1mc0m26MU_0GhF3sO2Wy2pnY3a2ZX0E9vSkUvnmYYfvMe7xFyydmMM65ufehnwABm6ohMuCpENhe5OP7dQZ6SM8QtYzIHJiZktUbfbajv7G5E_-GoQXSIresGpEOgOPZ9iAN1w6u3ZkdrZz360NHWvB0eaYgb0_kvM6QznpOTxuzQXfzMKVk_3L8snrLl6vF5cbfMLE_eWW147risGFhV2oJX0qjCskZZKGtR2qYAEOWcG1HK2kEBkhuoa9MAd6yp8nxKrg66fQzvo8NBb8MYu2SpQcoUFCTIRF0fKBsDYnSN7qNvTfzUnOl9YToVpveFaZXgmx_YtFX09cb9af6DfwN-iG2-</recordid><startdate>202206</startdate><enddate>202206</enddate><creator>Allen, Kristin S.</creator><creator>Burnard, Mark</creator><general>Cambridge University Press</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7WY</scope><scope>7WZ</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>87Z</scope><scope>88G</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8FL</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BEZIV</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FRNLG</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>F~G</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>K60</scope><scope>K6~</scope><scope>L.-</scope><scope>M0C</scope><scope>M2M</scope><scope>PQBIZ</scope><scope>PQBZA</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PSYQQ</scope><scope>Q9U</scope></search><sort><creationdate>202206</creationdate><title>Using inclusive assessments to support ethical decision making in organizations</title><author>Allen, Kristin S. ; Burnard, Mark</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c1006-da13e16b02c78c51b6a75c0f7c28d48cf5224891a486de25261a2ddaf21e0fb33</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2022</creationdate><topic>Ability tests</topic><topic>Best practice</topic><topic>Candidates</topic><topic>Cognitive ability</topic><topic>Commentaries</topic><topic>Decision making</topic><topic>Disability</topic><topic>Ethics</topic><topic>Inclusion</topic><topic>Labor shortages</topic><topic>Multiculturalism & pluralism</topic><topic>Psychologists</topic><topic>Quantitative psychology</topic><topic>Scientists</topic><topic>Validity</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Allen, Kristin S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Burnard, Mark</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (PDF only)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Psychology Database (Alumni)</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Business Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Business Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (Corporate)</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Professional Advanced</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global</collection><collection>ProQuest Psychology</collection><collection>ProQuest One Business</collection><collection>ProQuest One Business (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest One Psychology</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><jtitle>Industrial and organizational psychology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Allen, Kristin S.</au><au>Burnard, Mark</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Using inclusive assessments to support ethical decision making in organizations</atitle><jtitle>Industrial and organizational psychology</jtitle><addtitle>Ind. Organ. Psychol</addtitle><date>2022-06</date><risdate>2022</risdate><volume>15</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>246</spage><epage>249</epage><pages>246-249</pages><issn>1754-9426</issn><eissn>1754-9434</eissn><abstract>First stage: [...]stage: [...]stage: The ethical responsibility of assessment scientists lies in preserving the psychometric properties and legal defensibility of the assessment while making informed decisions that best balance the goals of the organization and the needs of the candidates. [...]careful consideration should be given to the weighting of the assessment components. When enough data on localized versions of assessment content becomes available, measurement equivalence should be established through confirmatory factor analysis procedures. [...]assessment scientists have a responsibility to continuous monitoring, validation, and an openness to new iterations of assessment programs based on these findings. [...]the framework for ethical decision making proposed in the focal article is a useful guide for industrial-organizational psychologists.</abstract><cop>New York, USA</cop><pub>Cambridge University Press</pub><doi>10.1017/iop.2022.7</doi><tpages>4</tpages></addata></record> |
| fulltext | fulltext |
| identifier | ISSN: 1754-9426 |
| ispartof | Industrial and organizational psychology, 2022-06, Vol.15 (2), p.246-249 |
| issn | 1754-9426 1754-9434 |
| language | eng |
| recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_2669422626 |
| source | Cambridge Journals |
| subjects | Ability tests Best practice Candidates Cognitive ability Commentaries Decision making Disability Ethics Inclusion Labor shortages Multiculturalism & pluralism Psychologists Quantitative psychology Scientists Validity |
| title | Using inclusive assessments to support ethical decision making in organizations |
| url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-02T06%3A14%3A47IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Using%20inclusive%20assessments%20to%20support%20ethical%20decision%20making%20in%20organizations&rft.jtitle=Industrial%20and%20organizational%20psychology&rft.au=Allen,%20Kristin%20S.&rft.date=2022-06&rft.volume=15&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=246&rft.epage=249&rft.pages=246-249&rft.issn=1754-9426&rft.eissn=1754-9434&rft_id=info:doi/10.1017/iop.2022.7&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2669422626%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2669422626&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_cupid=10_1017_iop_2022_7&rfr_iscdi=true |