Using inclusive assessments to support ethical decision making in organizations

First stage: [...]stage: [...]stage: The ethical responsibility of assessment scientists lies in preserving the psychometric properties and legal defensibility of the assessment while making informed decisions that best balance the goals of the organization and the needs of the candidates. [...]careful consideration should be given to the weighting of the assessment components. When enough data on localized versions of assessment content becomes available, measurement equivalence should be established through confirmatory factor analysis procedures. [...]assessment scientists have a responsibility to continuous monitoring, validation, and an openness to new iterations of assessment programs based on these findings. [...]the framework for ethical decision making proposed in the focal article is a useful guide for industrial-organizational psychologists.