Efficacy of Timolol Maleate (0.5%) in Preventing Rise of Intraocular Pressure (IOP) Post Neodymium: Yttrium Aluminum Garnet (Nd: YAG) Capsulotomy

Objective: To determine the efficacy of 0.5% Timolol eye drops in preventing rise of intraocular pressure following Neodymium: Yttrium-Aluminum-Garnet laser posterior capsulotomy. Study Design: Quasi-experimental study. Place and Duration of Study: Outpatient Department of Ophthalmology, Combined Mi...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Pakistan Armed Forces medical journal 2022-02, Vol.72 (1), p.255-59
Hauptverfasser: Iqbal, Nazia, Muzaffar, Waqar, Sarfaraz, Muhammad Haroon, Khan, Saim, Yasin, Ubaid Ullah, Abidin, Farooq Ul
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Objective: To determine the efficacy of 0.5% Timolol eye drops in preventing rise of intraocular pressure following Neodymium: Yttrium-Aluminum-Garnet laser posterior capsulotomy. Study Design: Quasi-experimental study. Place and Duration of Study: Outpatient Department of Ophthalmology, Combined Military Hospital Multan Pakistan, from May to Nov 2019. Methodology: Patients presenting with posterior capsule opacification, undergoing elective Neodymium: Yttrium Aluminum Garnet (Nd: Yag) Capsulotomy were enrolled in the study. Patients were alternatively assigned to two groups; group-1 was administered 0.5% Timolol Maleate eye drops, while group-2 was administered placebo natural team eye drops. Intraocular pressure for all the patients was measured at three-time points a). First measurement was baseline intraocular pressure at presentation/before the treatment. Second measurement was 1-hour post laser capsulotomy and third measurement was 3 hours post laser capsulotomy. Results: At 1-hour follow up, the mean intraocular pressure was significantly raised in the patients belonging to control group as compared to treatment group (21.45 ± 8.33 mm Hg vs 15.33 ± 3.37 mm Hg, p
ISSN:0030-9648
2411-8842
DOI:10.51253/pafmj.v72i1.6219