Truthful double auction mechanisms for online freight platforms with transaction costs
•We design double auction mechanisms for online freight platforms.•We propose two mechanisms with transaction costs and asymmetric demand information.•We show that the mechanisms have good properties.•Numerical studies show advantages of mechanisms over two commonly used mechanisms. In recent years,...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Transportation research. Part B: methodological 2022-04, Vol.158, p.164-186 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | •We design double auction mechanisms for online freight platforms.•We propose two mechanisms with transaction costs and asymmetric demand information.•We show that the mechanisms have good properties.•Numerical studies show advantages of mechanisms over two commonly used mechanisms.
In recent years, many online freight platforms have appeared to improve transport market efficiency. An important problem faced by such platforms is how to elicit the agents’ information and to match their supplies and demands efficiently. To address the problem, we propose the modified Multi-unit Trading Reduction and Vickery‒Clarke‒Groves (MMTR-MVCG) mechanism for considering heterogeneous transaction costs. Under this mechanism, the shippers and carriers first decide their bids, and then the platform determines the trading agents, sets the transaction prices, and matches the shippers’ demands and the carriers’ supplies. We show that this mechanism is incentive-compatible, individually rational, budget-balanced, and asymptotically efficient. For the special case with homogeneous transaction costs, we first show that the MMTR-MVCG mechanism can be simplified. In addition, we design a new double auction mechanism for the case with asymmetric demand information and homogeneous transaction costs and show that this mechanism also is incentive- compatible, individually rational, budget-balanced, and asymptotically efficient. Moreover, we conduct numerical studies to assess the impacts of transaction costs and information asymmetry on the mechanisms and compare the performance of our mechanisms with those of two commonly used mechanisms. Our mechanisms can yield greater social welfare, more trading agents, and larger trading volumes than the other two mechanisms. We also discuss the impact of the subsidy strategy. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 0191-2615 1879-2367 |
DOI: | 10.1016/j.trb.2022.02.009 |