Study on Potential Role and Benefits of Liquified Natural Gas Import Terminal in Latvia
Natural gas is relatively clean energy source, which emits less greenhouse gases (hereinafter – GHG), compared to other fossil fuels, such as hard and brown coal, and therefore it may be the most feasible resource to ensure smooth energy transition towards Europe’s climate neutrality by 2050. Tradit...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Latvian Journal of Physics and Technical Sciences 2022-04, Vol.59 (2), p.37-54 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 54 |
---|---|
container_issue | 2 |
container_start_page | 37 |
container_title | Latvian Journal of Physics and Technical Sciences |
container_volume | 59 |
creator | Ansone, A. Jansons, L. Bode, I. Dzelzitis, E. Zemite, L. Broks, A. |
description | Natural gas is relatively clean energy source, which emits less greenhouse gases (hereinafter – GHG), compared to other fossil fuels, such as hard and brown coal, and therefore it may be the most feasible resource to ensure smooth energy transition towards Europe’s climate neutrality by 2050. Traditional natural gas can be easily transported and used in liquefied (hereinafter – LNG) or compressed form. As for biomethane, in future it also can be used in liquefied (hereinafter – bioLNG) and compressed form, as well as transported by means of the current natural gas infrastructure. It can also significantly enhance regional and national energy security and independence, which has been challenging for the European Union (hereinafter – EU) over at least several decades.
Issue on energy independence, security of supply, alternative natural gas sources has been in a hotspot of the Baltic energy policy makers as well. Now, considering Russia’s invasion in Ukraine, since late February 2022, a problem of the EU natural gas dependency on the Russian Federation has escalated again and with force never before experienced. The European natural gas prices also hit records, as the natural gas prices in the Netherlands Title Transfer Facility reached 345 euros per megawatt-hour (hereinafter – EUR/MWh) in March 2022.
Therefore, LNG import terminal is the only viable option to reduce national dependency of the so-called pipe gas which in some cases, due to the insufficient interconnections, may be delivered from very limited number of sources. The European policy makers and relevant institutions are currently working towards radical EU natural gas supply diversification, where LNG deliveries coming from outside of Russia will certainly take a central stage.
In case of Latvia, the potential benefits of the LNG terminal development in Skulte were evaluated in order to reduce energy independence of the Russian natural gas deliveries in the Baltic region and to introduce new ways and sources of the natural gas flows to the Baltics. LNG terminal in Skulte could ensure significant capital investment cost reduction comparing to other projects proposed for Latvia in different periods, due to already existing natural gas transmission infrastructure and the relative closeness to the Incukalns underground gas storage (hereinafter – UGS). Various aspects, such as technical, political and economic ones, were analysed to assure that Skulte LNG terminal would be a real asset not only to c |
doi_str_mv | 10.2478/lpts-2022-0010 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2653050426</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2653050426</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c289t-3422ea4aed8ffd32fddde9c58cc51d557c95fe012db9abeff7b266fb7dae8edc3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNptkMFLwzAYxYMoOOaungOeO9OvTZviSYfOQVHRiceSNl8k0jVdkir77-2YoAdP3-PjvcfjR8h5zOaQ5uKy7YOPgAFEjMXsiEwAOI-EKLLjP_qUzLw3NQOeQBYzMSFvL2FQO2o7-mQDdsHIlj7bFqnsFL3BDrUJnlpNS7MdjDao6IMMgxttS-npatNbF-ga3cZ04890tJTh08gzcqJl63H2c6fk9e52vbiPysflanFdRg2IIkRJCoAylaiE1ioBrZTCouGiaXisOM-bgmtkMai6kDVqndeQZbrOlUSBqkmm5OLQ2zu7HdCH6sMObpziK8h4wjhLIRtd84OrcdZ7h7rqndlIt6tiVu35VXt-1Z5ftec3Bq4OgS_ZBnQK392wG8Vv-_9BXkCSJ9-tP3kZ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2653050426</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Study on Potential Role and Benefits of Liquified Natural Gas Import Terminal in Latvia</title><source>Walter De Gruyter: Open Access Journals</source><source>EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals</source><creator>Ansone, A. ; Jansons, L. ; Bode, I. ; Dzelzitis, E. ; Zemite, L. ; Broks, A.</creator><creatorcontrib>Ansone, A. ; Jansons, L. ; Bode, I. ; Dzelzitis, E. ; Zemite, L. ; Broks, A.</creatorcontrib><description>Natural gas is relatively clean energy source, which emits less greenhouse gases (hereinafter – GHG), compared to other fossil fuels, such as hard and brown coal, and therefore it may be the most feasible resource to ensure smooth energy transition towards Europe’s climate neutrality by 2050. Traditional natural gas can be easily transported and used in liquefied (hereinafter – LNG) or compressed form. As for biomethane, in future it also can be used in liquefied (hereinafter – bioLNG) and compressed form, as well as transported by means of the current natural gas infrastructure. It can also significantly enhance regional and national energy security and independence, which has been challenging for the European Union (hereinafter – EU) over at least several decades.
Issue on energy independence, security of supply, alternative natural gas sources has been in a hotspot of the Baltic energy policy makers as well. Now, considering Russia’s invasion in Ukraine, since late February 2022, a problem of the EU natural gas dependency on the Russian Federation has escalated again and with force never before experienced. The European natural gas prices also hit records, as the natural gas prices in the Netherlands Title Transfer Facility reached 345 euros per megawatt-hour (hereinafter – EUR/MWh) in March 2022.
Therefore, LNG import terminal is the only viable option to reduce national dependency of the so-called pipe gas which in some cases, due to the insufficient interconnections, may be delivered from very limited number of sources. The European policy makers and relevant institutions are currently working towards radical EU natural gas supply diversification, where LNG deliveries coming from outside of Russia will certainly take a central stage.
In case of Latvia, the potential benefits of the LNG terminal development in Skulte were evaluated in order to reduce energy independence of the Russian natural gas deliveries in the Baltic region and to introduce new ways and sources of the natural gas flows to the Baltics. LNG terminal in Skulte could ensure significant capital investment cost reduction comparing to other projects proposed for Latvia in different periods, due to already existing natural gas transmission infrastructure and the relative closeness to the Incukalns underground gas storage (hereinafter – UGS). Various aspects, such as technical, political and economic ones, were analysed to assure that Skulte LNG terminal would be a real asset not only to customers of Latvia, but also to those of the whole Baltic region, where in future it would be possible to use biomethane for efficient utilisation of existing and developing natural gas infrastructure.</description><identifier>ISSN: 2255-8896</identifier><identifier>ISSN: 0868-8257</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2255-8896</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2199-6156</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.2478/lpts-2022-0010</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Riga: Sciendo</publisher><subject>Biogas ; Biomethane ; Clean energy ; Economic analysis ; Energy ; energy independence ; Energy policy ; energy security ; Fossil fuels ; Gas flow ; gas storage ; Gas transmission ; Gases ; Greenhouse gases ; Imports ; Infrastructure ; Lignite ; Liquefied natural gas ; LNG ; Natural gas prices ; security of supply ; SoS ; Transfer facilities ; Underground storage</subject><ispartof>Latvian Journal of Physics and Technical Sciences, 2022-04, Vol.59 (2), p.37-54</ispartof><rights>2022. This work is published under http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0 (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c289t-3422ea4aed8ffd32fddde9c58cc51d557c95fe012db9abeff7b266fb7dae8edc3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c289t-3422ea4aed8ffd32fddde9c58cc51d557c95fe012db9abeff7b266fb7dae8edc3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://sciendo.com/pdf/10.2478/lpts-2022-0010$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwalterdegruyter$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://sciendo.com/article/10.2478/lpts-2022-0010$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwalterdegruyter$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925,76164,76165</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Ansone, A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jansons, L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bode, I.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dzelzitis, E.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zemite, L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Broks, A.</creatorcontrib><title>Study on Potential Role and Benefits of Liquified Natural Gas Import Terminal in Latvia</title><title>Latvian Journal of Physics and Technical Sciences</title><description>Natural gas is relatively clean energy source, which emits less greenhouse gases (hereinafter – GHG), compared to other fossil fuels, such as hard and brown coal, and therefore it may be the most feasible resource to ensure smooth energy transition towards Europe’s climate neutrality by 2050. Traditional natural gas can be easily transported and used in liquefied (hereinafter – LNG) or compressed form. As for biomethane, in future it also can be used in liquefied (hereinafter – bioLNG) and compressed form, as well as transported by means of the current natural gas infrastructure. It can also significantly enhance regional and national energy security and independence, which has been challenging for the European Union (hereinafter – EU) over at least several decades.
Issue on energy independence, security of supply, alternative natural gas sources has been in a hotspot of the Baltic energy policy makers as well. Now, considering Russia’s invasion in Ukraine, since late February 2022, a problem of the EU natural gas dependency on the Russian Federation has escalated again and with force never before experienced. The European natural gas prices also hit records, as the natural gas prices in the Netherlands Title Transfer Facility reached 345 euros per megawatt-hour (hereinafter – EUR/MWh) in March 2022.
Therefore, LNG import terminal is the only viable option to reduce national dependency of the so-called pipe gas which in some cases, due to the insufficient interconnections, may be delivered from very limited number of sources. The European policy makers and relevant institutions are currently working towards radical EU natural gas supply diversification, where LNG deliveries coming from outside of Russia will certainly take a central stage.
In case of Latvia, the potential benefits of the LNG terminal development in Skulte were evaluated in order to reduce energy independence of the Russian natural gas deliveries in the Baltic region and to introduce new ways and sources of the natural gas flows to the Baltics. LNG terminal in Skulte could ensure significant capital investment cost reduction comparing to other projects proposed for Latvia in different periods, due to already existing natural gas transmission infrastructure and the relative closeness to the Incukalns underground gas storage (hereinafter – UGS). Various aspects, such as technical, political and economic ones, were analysed to assure that Skulte LNG terminal would be a real asset not only to customers of Latvia, but also to those of the whole Baltic region, where in future it would be possible to use biomethane for efficient utilisation of existing and developing natural gas infrastructure.</description><subject>Biogas</subject><subject>Biomethane</subject><subject>Clean energy</subject><subject>Economic analysis</subject><subject>Energy</subject><subject>energy independence</subject><subject>Energy policy</subject><subject>energy security</subject><subject>Fossil fuels</subject><subject>Gas flow</subject><subject>gas storage</subject><subject>Gas transmission</subject><subject>Gases</subject><subject>Greenhouse gases</subject><subject>Imports</subject><subject>Infrastructure</subject><subject>Lignite</subject><subject>Liquefied natural gas</subject><subject>LNG</subject><subject>Natural gas prices</subject><subject>security of supply</subject><subject>SoS</subject><subject>Transfer facilities</subject><subject>Underground storage</subject><issn>2255-8896</issn><issn>0868-8257</issn><issn>2255-8896</issn><issn>2199-6156</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2022</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><recordid>eNptkMFLwzAYxYMoOOaungOeO9OvTZviSYfOQVHRiceSNl8k0jVdkir77-2YoAdP3-PjvcfjR8h5zOaQ5uKy7YOPgAFEjMXsiEwAOI-EKLLjP_qUzLw3NQOeQBYzMSFvL2FQO2o7-mQDdsHIlj7bFqnsFL3BDrUJnlpNS7MdjDao6IMMgxttS-npatNbF-ga3cZ04890tJTh08gzcqJl63H2c6fk9e52vbiPysflanFdRg2IIkRJCoAylaiE1ioBrZTCouGiaXisOM-bgmtkMai6kDVqndeQZbrOlUSBqkmm5OLQ2zu7HdCH6sMObpziK8h4wjhLIRtd84OrcdZ7h7rqndlIt6tiVu35VXt-1Z5ftec3Bq4OgS_ZBnQK392wG8Vv-_9BXkCSJ9-tP3kZ</recordid><startdate>20220401</startdate><enddate>20220401</enddate><creator>Ansone, A.</creator><creator>Jansons, L.</creator><creator>Bode, I.</creator><creator>Dzelzitis, E.</creator><creator>Zemite, L.</creator><creator>Broks, A.</creator><general>Sciendo</general><general>De Gruyter Poland</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7U5</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FG</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ARAPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BGLVJ</scope><scope>BYOGL</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>H8D</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>L7M</scope><scope>P5Z</scope><scope>P62</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20220401</creationdate><title>Study on Potential Role and Benefits of Liquified Natural Gas Import Terminal in Latvia</title><author>Ansone, A. ; Jansons, L. ; Bode, I. ; Dzelzitis, E. ; Zemite, L. ; Broks, A.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c289t-3422ea4aed8ffd32fddde9c58cc51d557c95fe012db9abeff7b266fb7dae8edc3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2022</creationdate><topic>Biogas</topic><topic>Biomethane</topic><topic>Clean energy</topic><topic>Economic analysis</topic><topic>Energy</topic><topic>energy independence</topic><topic>Energy policy</topic><topic>energy security</topic><topic>Fossil fuels</topic><topic>Gas flow</topic><topic>gas storage</topic><topic>Gas transmission</topic><topic>Gases</topic><topic>Greenhouse gases</topic><topic>Imports</topic><topic>Infrastructure</topic><topic>Lignite</topic><topic>Liquefied natural gas</topic><topic>LNG</topic><topic>Natural gas prices</topic><topic>security of supply</topic><topic>SoS</topic><topic>Transfer facilities</topic><topic>Underground storage</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Ansone, A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jansons, L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bode, I.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dzelzitis, E.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zemite, L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Broks, A.</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Solid State and Superconductivity Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies & Aerospace Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Technology Collection</collection><collection>East Europe, Central Europe Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Aerospace Database</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies Database with Aerospace</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies & Aerospace Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Advanced Technologies & Aerospace Collection</collection><collection>Publicly Available Content Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><jtitle>Latvian Journal of Physics and Technical Sciences</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Ansone, A.</au><au>Jansons, L.</au><au>Bode, I.</au><au>Dzelzitis, E.</au><au>Zemite, L.</au><au>Broks, A.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Study on Potential Role and Benefits of Liquified Natural Gas Import Terminal in Latvia</atitle><jtitle>Latvian Journal of Physics and Technical Sciences</jtitle><date>2022-04-01</date><risdate>2022</risdate><volume>59</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>37</spage><epage>54</epage><pages>37-54</pages><issn>2255-8896</issn><issn>0868-8257</issn><eissn>2255-8896</eissn><eissn>2199-6156</eissn><abstract>Natural gas is relatively clean energy source, which emits less greenhouse gases (hereinafter – GHG), compared to other fossil fuels, such as hard and brown coal, and therefore it may be the most feasible resource to ensure smooth energy transition towards Europe’s climate neutrality by 2050. Traditional natural gas can be easily transported and used in liquefied (hereinafter – LNG) or compressed form. As for biomethane, in future it also can be used in liquefied (hereinafter – bioLNG) and compressed form, as well as transported by means of the current natural gas infrastructure. It can also significantly enhance regional and national energy security and independence, which has been challenging for the European Union (hereinafter – EU) over at least several decades.
Issue on energy independence, security of supply, alternative natural gas sources has been in a hotspot of the Baltic energy policy makers as well. Now, considering Russia’s invasion in Ukraine, since late February 2022, a problem of the EU natural gas dependency on the Russian Federation has escalated again and with force never before experienced. The European natural gas prices also hit records, as the natural gas prices in the Netherlands Title Transfer Facility reached 345 euros per megawatt-hour (hereinafter – EUR/MWh) in March 2022.
Therefore, LNG import terminal is the only viable option to reduce national dependency of the so-called pipe gas which in some cases, due to the insufficient interconnections, may be delivered from very limited number of sources. The European policy makers and relevant institutions are currently working towards radical EU natural gas supply diversification, where LNG deliveries coming from outside of Russia will certainly take a central stage.
In case of Latvia, the potential benefits of the LNG terminal development in Skulte were evaluated in order to reduce energy independence of the Russian natural gas deliveries in the Baltic region and to introduce new ways and sources of the natural gas flows to the Baltics. LNG terminal in Skulte could ensure significant capital investment cost reduction comparing to other projects proposed for Latvia in different periods, due to already existing natural gas transmission infrastructure and the relative closeness to the Incukalns underground gas storage (hereinafter – UGS). Various aspects, such as technical, political and economic ones, were analysed to assure that Skulte LNG terminal would be a real asset not only to customers of Latvia, but also to those of the whole Baltic region, where in future it would be possible to use biomethane for efficient utilisation of existing and developing natural gas infrastructure.</abstract><cop>Riga</cop><pub>Sciendo</pub><doi>10.2478/lpts-2022-0010</doi><tpages>18</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 2255-8896 |
ispartof | Latvian Journal of Physics and Technical Sciences, 2022-04, Vol.59 (2), p.37-54 |
issn | 2255-8896 0868-8257 2255-8896 2199-6156 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_2653050426 |
source | Walter De Gruyter: Open Access Journals; EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals |
subjects | Biogas Biomethane Clean energy Economic analysis Energy energy independence Energy policy energy security Fossil fuels Gas flow gas storage Gas transmission Gases Greenhouse gases Imports Infrastructure Lignite Liquefied natural gas LNG Natural gas prices security of supply SoS Transfer facilities Underground storage |
title | Study on Potential Role and Benefits of Liquified Natural Gas Import Terminal in Latvia |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-18T21%3A17%3A30IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Study%20on%20Potential%20Role%20and%20Benefits%20of%20Liquified%20Natural%20Gas%20Import%20Terminal%20in%20Latvia&rft.jtitle=Latvian%20Journal%20of%20Physics%20and%20Technical%20Sciences&rft.au=Ansone,%20A.&rft.date=2022-04-01&rft.volume=59&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=37&rft.epage=54&rft.pages=37-54&rft.issn=2255-8896&rft.eissn=2255-8896&rft_id=info:doi/10.2478/lpts-2022-0010&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2653050426%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2653050426&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |