Are We Really Making Much Progress in Text Classification? A Comparative Review

This study reviews and compares methods for single-label and multi-label text classification, categorized into bag-of-words, sequence-based, graph-based, and hierarchical methods. The comparison aggregates results from the literature over five single-label and seven multi-label datasets and compleme...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:arXiv.org 2023-06
Hauptverfasser: Galke, Lukas, Diera, Andor, Bao Xin Lin, Khera, Bhakti, Meuser, Tim, Singhal, Tushar, Fabian, Karl, Scherp, Ansgar
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:This study reviews and compares methods for single-label and multi-label text classification, categorized into bag-of-words, sequence-based, graph-based, and hierarchical methods. The comparison aggregates results from the literature over five single-label and seven multi-label datasets and complements them with new experiments. The findings reveal that all recently proposed graph-based and hierarchy-based methods fail to outperform pre-trained language models and sometimes perform worse than standard machine learning methods like a multilayer perceptron on a bag-of-words. To assess the true scientific progress in text classification, future work should thoroughly test against strong bag-of-words baselines and state-of-the-art pre-trained language models.
ISSN:2331-8422