Patterns and controls of carbon dioxide concentration and fluxes at the air–water interface in South American lowland streams

Carbon dioxide (CO 2 ) emission from fluvial systems represents a substantial flux in the global carbon cycle. However, variation in fluvial CO 2 fluxes at the air–water interface as well as its drivers are poorly understood, especially in non-forested headwaters. Here, we measured CO 2 concentratio...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Aquatic sciences 2022-04, Vol.84 (2), Article 23
Hauptverfasser: Feijoó, Claudia, Arroita, Maite, Messetta, María Laura, Anselmo, Julieta, Rigacci, Laura, von Schiller, Daniel
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Carbon dioxide (CO 2 ) emission from fluvial systems represents a substantial flux in the global carbon cycle. However, variation in fluvial CO 2 fluxes at the air–water interface as well as its drivers are poorly understood, especially in non-forested headwaters. Here, we measured CO 2 concentration and fluxes in 14 lowland open-canopy streams (Pampean region, Argentina) that cover a wide range of land use and water quality. We also analyzed drivers of CO 2 concentration and fluxes, including factors related to metabolism, gas solubility, alkalinity, and gas transfer. Metabolic rates varied considerably among the study sites, but most streams (i.e., 8 out of the 11 where we were able to estimate ecosystem metabolism) were net heterotrophic. Metabolic differences among sites were mostly driven by the aromatic carbon content and the percent of the stream reach covered by primary producers. All streams, even those that were not net heterotrophic were CO 2 supersaturated. Alkalinity combined with in-stream primary production explained 52.3% of the variance in the partial pressure of CO 2 ( p CO 2 ), but our observations suggest that p CO 2 might be controlled by external groundwater inputs of dissolved inorganic carbon rather than by internal metabolism. All streams were net emitters of CO 2 to the atmosphere. Significantly more variance in CO 2 flux was explained by gas transfer velocity (63.7%) than by p CO 2 (21.9%). We also observed high spatial heterogeneity in CO 2 fluxes within each stream, which was associated with flow variation and the presence of different macrophyte and algae patches. Overall, our results indicate that CO 2 emission in these extremely low turbulence streams is controlled by a combination of external and internal biogeochemical processes and limited atmospheric exchange.
ISSN:1015-1621
1420-9055
DOI:10.1007/s00027-022-00852-9