Incentive Compatibility and the Consequences When It Is Missing: Experiments with Water Quality Credits Purchase

This article implemented four treatments to elicit preferences for a nonmarket good, including (1) a hypothetical referendum, (2) a real referendum lacking incentive compatibility, (3) a real choice with incentive compatibility, and (4) a hybrid approach based on (2) and (3). We develop a method to...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Land economics 2021-11, Vol.97 (4), p.893-910
Hauptverfasser: Liu, Pengfei, Swallow, Stephen K
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:This article implemented four treatments to elicit preferences for a nonmarket good, including (1) a hypothetical referendum, (2) a real referendum lacking incentive compatibility, (3) a real choice with incentive compatibility, and (4) a hybrid approach based on (2) and (3). We develop a method to estimate the probability that observed choices do not identify the highest-utility alternative in a choice question. We find that in the hypothetical referendum, the estimated percentage of individuals choosing the alternative that gives the highest utility is the lowest among the treatments. Adding policy consequentiality or payment consequentiality increases the percentage of truthful responses.
ISSN:0023-7639
1543-8325
DOI:10.3368/le.97.4.050920-0064R1